Being a cute rori is torture because some pervert dentist will probably make the filling/extraction procedures more painful than necessary and "accidentally" hit the wrong spots just so he can hear the cute yelp in pain and fear, and to feel like he has control over her and is taking revenge against his crush.

If I were a rori or a teenage cute I'd be terrified of dentists. They will bump into a pervert like that at some point in their life and suffer unnecessarily.

I just can't access it right now it's a total white screen (;´Д`)

I think one problem we will have to face up to more and more as Heyuri gains popularity is the problem of moralfaggotry. You know, people hopped up on the overriding philosophy of nu-chan and the popular net. That philosophy of "Internet is Serious Business.", which causes them to recoil at the sight of unfettered LOLs, to fail to understand plain sarcasm, and to make it their mission to shit up a thread so they can go on some faggy moral crusade.
You probably already know who I'm talking about, and can probably already guess the two types of moralfags we're likely to run into, so I won't bury the lead.
We don't see many moralfags from the liberal set,since their concept of imageboards begins ends at 4chan and they're too scared to explore anywhere else (last I remember is that tranny posting Bridget. How the fuck did he even get here?)
What we do see a bit of, and will probably see more of in the future, is idpol obssessed 2016 election tourists, who consider it their duty to stamp out 'degeneracy', 'tranime' and any LOLs they may encounter along the way
Heyuri is in particular danger, because of our front and center interest in lolis,our refusal to spend all day arguing about idpol talking points, and our refusal of wojak/oomer monstrosities, which is the main way moralfags beat you over the head with their opinions these days.
So what do you think we can do about this, if anything? I mean, even before the recent surge, there were some people derailing JC threads, even right NOW there are people shitting up such threads, see >>31277
I feel like under no politics there should be an addendum that insists on no moralfaggotry, but at the same time I feel like that would be too vague, and not so useful.
I don't know, I feel like if we're too easy-going about it the zoomer moralfags will outnumber everyone else and this will become just another shitty imageboard devoid of all LOLs.

Comment too long, view post No.62115 to see the full comment.

Mod sama plz remove https://img.heyuri.net/b/koko.php?res=88437&q=88492#postform ! It's a DISGUSTING addition to my perfectly good thread

What happened to gurochan?

みんな言語決定論って知ってる？

言語で人の根本的考え方が決まるって理論なんだけど、日本語が最強と言われてるんだ。

そんな言語決定論について話そうよ
ヽ(=´▽`=)ﾉ

mod sama please remove cp
https://img.heyuri.net/b/koko.php?res=81670

tor users gonna get banned now for a few hours

How long do you guys wanna guess its gonna be till post number 88888 on /b/?

I found a font that looks very identical to MS PGothic called MS PRGothic.
http://font2s.com/fonts/54771/ms_prgothic.html
Should Heyuri's AA tag feature and the Pseud0ch Mona theme on /lounge/ add support for it?

Have you ever stared at the wall? It has many health benefits for the brain if done for 30m-01h

Try it, You will feel Happier Later

Does anyone know Jap singers who sing in French? There's a lot of Shibuya-kei type artists who sing in sort of half English, but I especially like how it sounds when they sing in French.. Uh お願いします (Pic rel is what I've already got also I think this is in relation to Japan and it's culture?)

Here are some differences between Mona and MS PRGothic.

El salvador te da la bienvenida a sus brazos ヽ(´ー｀)ノ

もっと多くの人にここで活躍してほしい。

teh rule 8

https://img.heyuri.net/b/koko.php?res=87156#p87378

I have to admit that I'm one of those guys who can't exactly make up his mind about things because I'm so easily swayed. I read widely but can never really suss out whether what I'm reading is bullshit, beyond the most obvious lies and mistakes. I can read up on anything from Communism to Fascism to Anarcho-Niggeritism and think, "Well, I dunno, he's got a point!", until I'm convinced of the counter argument by some other thinker.

Basically I'm wondering how to develop skills for analyzing arguments, since I notice users here are fairly good at 'debunking' things.

I'm wondering;

-Where do I start with analyzing people's arguments? Should I read books on philosophy? Rhetoric? Logic? Critical Thinking?
Maybe there are methods I can use starting now without having to read anything?

-Once I've done some reading/listening/watching, how do I 'organize' it in my head so that I approach my own conclusions about the topic, instead of getting wrapped up in the author's manipulations? I don't want it to be a kneejerk reaction of agreeing or disagreeing because the 'vibe' felt right.

-I write sometimes,so I'm particularly interested in how I can 'flip things around' to my perspective, and think of them in an original way, like, If I'm expounding my thoughts on a certain philosophy, or writing a rebuttal of a certain ideology. Whenever I write I either go along without any particular point,or start autistically copying out whichever book has influenced me that week. I think this because I struggle to meaningfully internalize whatever it is I've read/watched, so I can't have a proper 'argument' with the material, as some do. I'm basically wondering about how I can understand things better in a way that's true to 'me', without getting 'taken in' by the author and thinking they have all the answers until someone 'debunks' them.

-I know that 'peer-reviewed studies' and statistics in general don't have as much weight to them as some believe, nor are they quite as direct as many people claim, so how do I go about analyzing these studies? Basically, how do I know when academics have cooked the numbers, or when there are certain variables at play that might invalidate the study, or contradict the point of the person using those studies as proof?

Besides explaining yourself that you were the victim of some degree of homosexual rape as a young child, it is very obvious that you bear all the trademarks of a child who grew up without proper supervision and help. When i met you, you were age 14 or 15, and within a couple months i saw deep into the dark, hideious recesses of your mind. Only a child who suffered at the hands of adults throughout his development phases could grow up into being such a twisted, disgusting, insane, and perverse being. I believe if you could get away with it, you would kill thousands, rape thousands, torture, burn, loot, and take deep, perverted satisfaction of watching the misery of innocent people. You are a cruel and disgusting beast.