>>64025
I think there is something to talk about if only you make the effort to be more detailed.

You say you like /b/ because it's most active, but would you still like it if it was most active and also very shitty?
There must be a certain quality in particular that attracts you to it.

>>64026
Maybe that quality is just the true randomness of that board. While 4/b/ is mostly bait or the same porn threads every day, with very few actually "random" threads.
And even then, well you know how most discussions go on 4chan nowadays.

>Which board do you use/lurk the most, and why?
I browse all boards equally since I am an professional Heyuri enthusiast, but I mostly post to whichever ones that other users are mostly posting to

I mainly post replies since I spend most of my days working on various projects, which doesn't leave much time/energy to think of an original topic (plus I've been here for 3 years and ran out of fresh/obvious thread ideas a long time ago)

>Which board do you use/lurk the least, and why?
The ones that other users post to the least, for the same reasons as above

Most: /b/ like the majority of other Heyuri users im pretty sure. i try to be as active on /sw/ as i can but i usually just reply to others on there rather than post. i also check /o/ very often just bc i love OC and want to feed my addiction as often as i can.

Least: i have yet to post on /jp/. please dont get me wrong, i love the fact that we have /jp/, i want to see its activity grow, and i was really excited for it when it was announced (would love to see more boards as well), but i just dont speak japanese. I never really had any interest in learning japanese so i never went out of my way to translate anything into japanese just to post it on /jp/, although i wouldnt be surprised if i do exactly that someday. i still lurk and check up on /jp/ like once a day. I may even check up on it more often than i do /lounge/. love /lounge/, tons of fun threads on there, but for some reason i only read it when its really late and im feeling cozy. Nights like those are when i wrap myself around in your guys' words about incest and dreams and melt into my mattress. i save /lounge/ for special occasions.

We don't really have enough boards for this thread to make sense, anon.
In fact, I think a lot of posters wouldn't be able to tell you which board they even use 'more' as it's still slow enough that using them all is very possible. I know I'm in that position.

as it wasn't include... i like to write mine as; LOLicon!

That's everything.
I hope you enjoyed~

Thanks!

Just realized I never posted the link
https://www.mediafire.com/file/bsgo3df4nsyc6xv/%255BLee%255D_Onsen_he_Youkoso.zip/file

晚上好

ｷﾀ━━━(ﾟ∀ﾟ)━━━!!

こんばんは

おはよう

あさだよ～！

Damn, I just realized I also don't make much threads either. I just reply to preexisting threads.
I must remedy this...

11
Looking at how many different threads there are made me realize how many people there are here. sometimes it just feels like theres me and 5 other people and we dont even realize its us 5 the whole time

If we look at how many replies vote has, it's median is about 20 and peak 30. Which would make our community rather small, but I also think those who use vote are regular users.

Also, in two weeks we went from >>55066 to 56941. So about 2000 posts divded in 800 threads. I try to reply almost in every one, but thats not true either thus lets state I post once in ever 400 threads. That would make 400 of the 2000 post... meaning, if there are others like me, that would make us 5 people!

Only one..for now..but I did make threads before but I guess they are in the archive/void

KEEP HEYURI ALIVE!

Welcome 2 Heyuri

our hero! :3

I totally missed the context

spoiler alert the b&hammer was fake

of course not!

our mighty mod-sama would never do something fake!

hell yeah! that spaghetti eating contests sounds awesome af! I join, i already got some in my frige.

I would love to see more tripfagging as it would make us more unquie as a community, but for now there are very few of us. And if I am the only active faggot, i will stand out to much as i guess I already do. But thanks.

I don't see a problem with blogposts and the like, especially because most of them don't break any rules

I'm NEET and have depression. I'm also a mentally ill normalfag virgin.

>>63672
B-but OP faggot-sama, aren't you also ranting about hating people you dislike? Gh-ghuh~

>aren't you also ranting about hating people you dislike?
No! It was a rant about a certain strain of now-seemingly-absent Heyuri posts, and the rant was posted to the Heyuri board for discussing Heyuri. This is a proper use of Site Discussion@Heyuri

Nothing x3 ヽ(´ー｀)ノ

Look for the bare necessities, the simple bare necessities
Forget about your worries and your strife

( ´ω`)

the dishes (-＿-)

I was supposed to fall asleep by midnight. Now it's four o'clock in the fuckin' MORNING!!!!1

（ ´,_ゝ`）

I stayed up so long it's now closer to noon ヽ(´∇`)ノ

Boot up Silent Hill on ePSXe but it isn't working and now I have to pull the PS1 out of storage only to find I can't hook it up to my TV so I need to dig an older monitor out of storage (>_<)

許される以上症例されてるよ(*^ーﾟ)b

>症例
違う「しょうれい」ｗ
奨励*

許されますよ。

>Link to the thread so I can comment better, but without it,
Ah, thread is gone now, (don't know if it's archived) but I saved some images:https://ibb.co/kMqFjbC

The original thread was actually on some Irish or British site, so I think I misremembered it as opening around 3AM, at which point people would definitely be at home, when in actuality it opened at 3PM. I guess you're right about people just being at work when things went down.

>The exact opposite: it was mainstream (in the sense of normalfag, but the opinion itself was only from a fringe group), especially older people, who were saying that.

I don't think 'the exact opposite' is totally right. Yes, there was normalfag older people who disliked TV on the grounds of its being 'the new thing to hate', but there were also alternative characters who disliked it, for different reasons. Its the same as today. There are countless old people always bitching about phones and social media, since it's the new thing to hate, but we here also dislike them, but for different reasons than the old fogeys.

Heyurizens in 1993 would probably be nostalgic for ARPANet and the punchcard era.

>>5178
Yeah, you can also see it from how the post is formulated: if any of you folk is "AT A" tv. Not if any of you folk "have a" tv. The mention of sky news is another tell: sky news was always a tv channel (well, since 1989).

>but there were also alternative characters who disliked it, for different reasons
I truly don't know of any such account. Maybe that depends on where you lived at the time? I was always into tech and my father was in IT so I had early internet access (~1995). I can't speak for what it was like before 1993, obviously, but I have never encountered an online comment against TV (that wasn't "old man yells at cloud"), inside or outside the mainstream until maybe 2008-2009 or so. At the very least it was a fringe within a fringe, otherwise I would definitely have at least seen mentions.
It would be nice (for historical purposes) if you could find anything to substantiate this idea.
If anyone ITT wants to dig, there's https://archive.org/details/usenet and https://www.usenetarchives.com for usenet and there are a bunch of archives bbs-related material at https://archive.org/details/bbshistory among others.

It would be full of salty old UNIXfags whining about how home PCs ruined everything.

>>5231
Very much doubt it. Rather more likely that there would be OS flamewars. "Ah, unix is such shit! Multics is where it's at!" "lispos where art thou?" "apple has >novents" etc. We're talking 1993, not 1975, here.

I fixed! ｷﾀ━━━(・∀・)━━━!!

Baka chatgpt...

The student has surpassed the master. Congratz!

thx! it wasn't anything complex but putting it bluntly, ChatGPT-san was trying to make it "perfect" in a way that's probably not possible

I also made the buttons look nicer

>>63975
How do I refresh my page to show these??? I don't see it yet (;´Д`)

>>63976
They're currently only on Lounge
Maybe I should add them to Off-Topic too? They are only different because I prepared Lounge's script to have separate emotes
I will try to find more kaomojis later, the more the better in this case

>>63966
You know, mod-sama. Of all of us here on heyuri, you are without doubt the most mysterious of them all... as you are the only one without a real tripfag as I am aware of. I am pretty sure I've talked with you on cystream. However, I've still not connected all the dots just yet. I've my guesses tho.

>However, I've still not connected all the dots just yet
the answers you are seeking lies within old townhall logs

Let the hunt begin!

With this, i can die in peace!

Thoughts? (´･ω･`)

かつこいいかんごしです

水です、こりい、みず氷になった。

暢ではない。

-日本語

>みずです
ありがとうございます

>>625
聖水プレイか

女の子のおしっこは聖水なり

>>5183
Well shit, I'd have to put in training if I want to do a standing flip...

>>5183
Do you think you could teach me how?

Of course, friend. My fees are $250/hour. I accept bitcoin as payment. When would you like to start?

>>5188
Damn, so it was all build up to ad. Salesmen are scary

People do drama from nothing these days. Anyway funny talk right there.

I been holding on to reply to this, but as a player that "wasted" a good 200 days worth playing Runescape 2, and oldschool RS. It was without a grind to achive some kind of goal. Either it was making money in game to buy cool gear, or it was to achive a certail level for a quest or item. It was fun and pleasing to reach what ever goal I had in mind then. The grinding itself was never really that fun, but it was something you did to have fun. I got 99 mining as first max skill, and it took avout 3-4 months of just click on a rock... It was painful and I spent most of my time watching other things while i did it. Was it fun? NO! But at the same time, Runescape was so attention catching and imersive and so vast in what one could do in the game. It was for me an escape from the real world after all. Just to focus and achiving things as I was a loser in real life after all. In game, I was just me! :3

I can still thinking of wanting to play it, but I wont as I don't have the energy to waste time at it once again.

Whats even more interesting is - people play MMORPG to meet other players and have fun. And, the things I liked about RS was the other players too, however I liked the casual talking. But i never really liked the aspect of having friends to chat with or hang out with. Just as how similiar this is to imgboards. Most of the time I just played and did my own things while time to time just talking with strangers.

Here's a good video about solo in MMO:
https://youtu.be/b2l2ZxNhCSg

Meh. The video does point out some good points about the "type of loner" but the basic point of view (which is why all MMOs are dead) that games must appeal to the lowest common denominator. No! Not all games are for everyone. Don't drive your core audience away, it also causes others to run away (though you don't care, do you? You got your money, you greedy asshole). For example the ridiculously bad points about not being able to make a loner in a singleplayer game (what are NPCs?) or that loners make sense in an MMO (other players end up being literally NPCs, the loner archetype worked only in multiplayer-required MMOs because only then can you solo gank n00bs, become highly valued for your skillset and therefore a loner 'gun for hire', and other shenanigans). Basically the common issue of hasty conclusions. For example, 90% of lurkers don't post because 'people are interesting', or because they're consuming useful contents like jokes or tech information that can't be found anywhere else? He claims the former with no proof. Similarly, pretending that introverts don't like interacting in an MMO is insane. Again with stupid conclusions from incomplete data. It's hilarious because he pointed out just seconds before that introverts use MMOs as a social fulfillment tool for the social they can't get IRL. Why would they do that if they don't see it as different than IRL, and why would they use it if they didn't want to interact?

People who haven't played MMOs before ~2008 don't know what MMOs really are about. After WoW became big, everything became shit because it tried copy-pasting what they thought made WoW good, which is to say they waited until WoW started becoming shit and copied only the shitty features instead of anything good (for example, making the game even MORE soloable than WoW, which still required and encouraged grouping in various ways until they started implementing complete bullshit like dungeon finders and group finders).

This includes various game design problems like making the games soloable at all, and even worse: making the game more efficient while playing alone, especially combined with "the game only starts at max level" retardation. This combined just as well as you'd expect with trash like discord, turning MMOs into ghost towns. Now they're all massively singleplayer online (MSO) games, no longer MMOs. MSOs can (rarely) be fun in their own right, but they aren't even remotely the same thing. Both osrs and runescape2 unfortunately fall in this bin, for example (the original runescape didn't, but osrs, while it started as an old build and thus the same as old runescape, very quickly started piling on features from nuRunescape, making osrs no longer anything like the good stuff).

On a separate note, ever played disgaea games? I think you'd probably love them. Couple it with some chat program to get your occasional chat while playing for an experience you would surely enjoy.

I found this thread-relevant essay by Andy Gavin, who was a core developer at Naughty Dog in the crash bandicoot/jak & daxter days.
https://all-things-andy-gavin.com/2012/10/29/wow-endgames-vanilla/
He looks fondly on the WoW endgame despite noting how torturous a lot of it was. More interestingly, I think, is the first paragraph pointing out right away how leveling to max was basically a singleplayer game. Continuing this thread's discussion, this is what most people at large mean when they say WoW killed videogames.
His comments discussing the size of the world and zones and the prettyness of them and such is, on the other hand, examples of things WoW did really well, even beyond its peers, that nobody else copied (even though they should, because to be honest, that's the real reason people played until they got to max level).

>>5131
I'm interested in this approach of yours, but frankly I'm half retarded. Do you think you can explain in detail how to evaluate philosophy by 'running simulations'?

>>5195
You can use or write various software like in
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ei_jS-SLWb8
or the videos from this series:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=goePYJ74Ydg
Those are more focused on social dynamics simulation but the same basic principle applies.

Taking my example again with the definition of evil, you can simulate actors in the environment that systematically perform evil actions in various proportions, and measure the overall welfare of the species after X simulation steps, much like in the beard example. This way, you can determine if there is alignment between the definition of evil proposed in the philosophy, and the listing of evil actions that are proposed in the philosophy. Another example: you can measure if stability really is achieved in a moral corruption simulation, as machieveli suggested.

Another facet of this kind of simulation is that you can measure how closely the behavior observed based on the philosophical premises proposed adhere to real life behavioral observations. For example, you can simulate a world where everyone is born evil and adapt the simulation in an attempt to make it coherent with real life observations. In the end, you obtain a parsimonious sampling of the models most likely to fit real life, and/or that have the greatest social welfare satisfaction rate, or whatever other metric you are interested in.

Computer simulation is the easiest way to do it and there are several software suites you can find to help set up basic simulations of that kind. Of course you can always use pen and paper and solve differential equations, or use tools from the operational research literature (simplex, waiting lines, inventory profit, and stochastic processes are especially relevant) and model the actors this way.

Reserrections

I have a resurrection in my pants

>>5150
I think I read it in a Micheal Crichton book. (Disclosure)

One of the characters said, about backlash to the feminist movement (circa 1993)

"The rules changed for the men, and they didn't like it. Well soon enough the rules will start changing for the women, and they won't like it either."

Incel is not a philosophy. The first post itt has it right. Also please keep these threads to other venues like 4chan or something.

>>5156
This thread was started two years ago, there's no point complaining about people violating a rule that probably wasn't made yet.

>>5157
Yeah, sorry, I realized too late. That said it shouldn't have been bumped now that the rules are in place. Already in 2022 some people were (rightfully) asking for it as can be seen earlier in this thread.

>>5166
sorry about that, newfag here