Imagine instead of scientists using their resources and knowledge to research gay things such as curing cancer and whatnot, they used those things for something that actually matters like making irl oppai lolis. Thoughts?

would you kiss a boy if you were a boy?

u know who live in this house?

KONATA HAZ GUN

Ow.... mai pooper

sundae on a sunday

i wish i could sleep with myself! sometimes in bed i stare at my selfies and imagine it was someone else.... but nobody i know is good enough to be with me, so now i'm all alone

Do you have any ball-jointed dolls (or any poseable dolls for that matter)? What scenes/activities are they portraying? Do you dress them up as well?

horny gurls

thanks to the latest developments in technology, science has made it possible for robots to develop asperger autism!

ｷﾀ━━━(ﾟ∀ﾟ)━━━!!

In the last post about my vocal synthesis project, I talked about implementing the Wide-Band Voice Pulse Modeling algorithm. Since then, I've actually done some original research of my own and have devised what I believe to be three minor improvements to the algorithm.

I implemented the Wide-Band Voice Pulse Modeling algorithm (from Dr. Jordi Bonada's PhD thesis: https://www.tdx.cat/bitstream/handle/10803/7555/tjbs.pdf) via the upsampling method (specifically, upsampling via a natural cubic spline). There are actually two methods proposed in that paper, the other being via periodization. There is actually a patent that pertains to WBVPM, but it only covers the periodization version (which is what they used for their results), so I have implemented the upsampling method instead. I have been able to validate the main results in that paper; specifically, its shape-invariance and lower residual when compared to other methods. Furthermore, I have devised three significant improvements to the algorithm - two of which are only possible because I used the spline approach, so in a sense it was good that I had to do it that way.

Of the three improvements, I have implemented the first two and shown their advantage of the original WBVPM algorithm. The resulting score has been obtained by taking the mean of the relative of residual level (i.e. the difference between the original and reconstructed signal; relative to the level original signal). I have done so on an audio sample that deliberately exhibits traits that were noted as negatively affecting the WBVPM algorithm's resulting quality. Notably, a low pitch voice with rapid and deep vibrato, transients, strong amplitude modulation, and a large portion of the sampling being between a voiced/unvoiced/voiced transition.

First I should note that my WBVPM implementation is currently far from optimal. The pitch estimation system (via the modified TWM algorithm) has not undergone testing and tuning of its parameters, and there are many variations of the TWM algorithm to consider. Additionally, I have not implemented unvoiced/voiced detection (because, as far as I can tell, it is not mentioned in Bonada's thesis; presumably it's in prior literature, but I have not researched it yet), so all the algorithms act as if they are always processing a voiced signal even when they are not.

RESILIENT BORDER INTERPOLATION IN SYNTHESIS - When I first implemented the synthesis step for WBVPM, it was late at night and I was tired. I wanted a quick result before I went to bed and didn't understand the wording of the description of the synthesis step in WBVPM. As such, my original implementation differed significantly. Instead of using the overlap-and-add, it instead, for each sample, found the closest voice pulse and determined its value for that time, taking advantage of the spline that was generated for downsampling and using the periodic nature of the pulse to extend it when the sample was beyond its domain (i.e. the opposite of overlapping). This approach lead to high-frequency crackling artifacts due to discontinuities between the voice pulse boundaries.

The following day, I properly understood the synthesis approach and rewrote the synthesis code. Interestingly, this actually gave worse overall results. While the high frequency artifacts were gone, there were now large low frequency artifacts that appeared as large modulations in the time-domain. I eventually tracked this down to being a bug in my implementation of the MFPA algorithm that sometimes resulted in massive errors of up to 1.5 radians. I fixed this bug and the reconstruction synthesis no longer had significant artifacts, but I thought it was interesting that my approach, despite having the discontinuity issue, was more resilient to errors in the MFPA estimation. I began thinking if the two approaches could be combined to create an even better approach.

I was thinking about why the modulation occurred in the case of the overlap-and-add method. Thinking about it, when the fundamental frequency is stationary and the MFPA onsets are perfect, the trapezoidal window function is equivalent to a weighted average between two adjacent voice pulses over the duration of twice the border interpolation size. However, when the MFPA onsets are inaccurate, or even just when the fundamental frequency is non-stationary, this is no longer true. Even worse, thinking about it from the weighted average point of view, the sum isn't necessarily one everywhere anymore, hence the modulation.

I then devised a method that would not result in modulation. This method works by first synthesizing the 'inner' portion of each pulse (by 'inner', I mean starting at the end of the border interpolation at the start, and ending before the start of the next border interpolation towards the end of the pulse). Then, for the gaps in between each pulse, we calculate each sample value by a weighted average of two values. These are values are the values of each voice pulse at that time. Since the gap extends beyond the boundaries of each voice pulse, we use the periodic nature of the pulses to compute the effective position in the voice pulse by taking the position modulo the period of the fundamental frequency at that voice pulse. The fundamental frequencies of each of the voice pulses may differ, so we actually change step in time linearly. At each end of the gap, the step size for the voice pulse it is next to is one sample in time, while the step for the former voice pulse is the equivalent of one sample in the latter voice pulse relative to the former's fundamental frequency (e.g. if the second voice pulse has twice the fundamental frequency as the first; the step size for the first would be 2 and tep size for the second would be 1, at the end of the gap). For the start of the gap, it is the same except relative to the first pulse having a step of 1. In between, we the step size interpolate linearly.

It is worth noting that in the ideal case where the onsets are exactly correct and the fundamental frequency is stationary, the result of this approach is the same as using the trapezoidal window.

FREQUENCY WARP-CORRECTION - As noted in Bonada's thesis, WBVPM assumes that the fundamental frequency is stationary within each pulse, however this is not actually true, and that the artifacts from this are particularly apparent for low fundamental frequency voice signals, because each period of the signal is longer in time and thus the internal state of the system has more time to change.

One of the changes that can happen over time is modulation of the fundamental frequency. This can be thought of actually as a time-domain remapping function that distorts each voice pulse according to a continuous fundamental frequency trajectory.

I discovered a way of correcting this, largely by accident as I was thinking about solving the modulation issue I discussed in the previous section. I was thinking about how I proposed changing the step size linearly in the gaps between the 'inner' pulses. I was thinking, we have a discrete sequence of fundamental frequencies. So, what if instead of changing the step size linearly, we instead created a spline from the fundamental frequencies and instead changed the step size based on that? Then I realized that we could also use this for the whole voice pulses and just sample everything with a step size based on the fundamental frequency trajectory. I then realized that this would actually act like the distortion from changing parameters within each voice pulse, at least in the synthesis stage. Further more, since we are already computing splines for each voice pulse to downsample it, this comes at very little additional computational cost.

However, the voice pulses in analysis are already distorted. So then I already we can do the inverse resampling in the upsampling stage of WBVPM analysis to correct for non-stationary frequency, then it is redistorted according to the transformed fundamental frequency trajectory in the synthesis stage. This makes this method effectively invariant to modulations in fundamental frequency, so long as the modulation is less than the fundamental frequency and it is modeled well by the spline, which should be the case for modulation period is at least several voice pulses.

Comment too long, view post No.180302 to see the full comment.

Any artwork like this?(picture and gif are both OK)

ｷﾀ━━━(ﾟ∀ﾟ)━━━!!

We will watch Mahoromatic: Automatic Maiden (2001) on the next Saturday (18th), starting 18:00 UTC

It's about a troubled boy who lives alone unexpectedly meeting a meido andoroido girl who turns out to be battle-level powerful and wanting to spend the remaining of her limited lifespan with her. There's seemingly a secret organization and perhaps a secret past to the android too. With this much clue I have a guess where the power-on buttan for the robot is
えっちなのはいけないと思います！

For newcomers, you can find the detailed information and our previous streams from here: https://wiki.heyuri.net/index.php?title=Heyuri_Cytube
Heyuri's rules apply in the CyTube channel.

Also please fill our nominations page where we pick these shows from: https://cgi.heyuri.net/nominate/ - you must log in at least once every 4~ months to keep your votes intact!

MAHORO!
MAHORO!
MAHORO!
MAHORO!
MAHORO!

Hey hey hey hey psst psst psst
HEY!
C'mere, kid... I got somethin' to show ya...
No, no... not that thing in mah pants... I'll show that to ya later... heh... (・∀・)

SO, as you're probably aware by now we accept fullbanner submissions from users, which were hence posted to this here thread on this very board: >>64431
Just to refresh, fullbanners are images that can link to other boards within Heyuri or to external sites. They are required to be 468x60px.

AND WHAT YOU PROBABLY MAYBE DIDN'T KNOW is that's been almost two years since the last post in that thread lol and we've only had like three approved in the past few months. Thanks to the guys who made the /j/ and radio banners. (σ･∀･)σ

SUBMISSIONS CAN BE DONE HERE AND YES, YOU CAN STICK YOUR PENIS IN THERE:
https://img.heyuri.net/q/koko.php?mode=module&load=fullBanner
also teh clickable link underneath the top fullbanner on this page

The real good news is us mods are now able to approve banners ourselves, so... this probably won't affect approval rate by a lot, but uh... it will be a little bit higher! At least 0.2% more! Rejoice! ヽ(`Д´)ノ

Do bear in mind for people looking to advertise their own website with a banner will have needed to be Rule 7+8 compliant to begin with, and also the banner itself must be SFW (but if your website is for, like, fat German grandma bestiality scat porn or something, we don't care). We also have the ability to remove banners from the rotation, but you don't have to pay us anything for the right to advertise. So even if you get rejected, it won't cost you anything. (*^ーﾟ)b

As for links to Heyuri subdomains, so far our lineup covers:
- /jp/
- /o/
- /j/
- /sw/
- The radio
- Da Rulez

Comment too long, view post No.70439 to see the full comment.

let's all stretch

don't forget to bring your BOKU tonight ^_^

ｷﾀ━━━(ﾟ∀ﾟ)━━━!!