Site Discussion@Heyuri

thanks for reporting
https://github.com/Heyuri/kokonotsuba/issues/137

source bug will be fixed, but applied something so it shows the correct number now

and actually fixed now

kowai

Anonymous ## Mod 2024/09/15(Sun)08:38:29 ID:MODERATOR No.67415

DISREGARD WHAT I SAID BEFORE, I SUCK COCKS

Repost of a thread on /jp/ and more importantly, a /jp/ meme from 2014: https://boards.4chan.org/jp/thread/47796802
https://archived.moe/jp/thread/12857687/

>Repost of a thread on /jp/
It seems the other way around? There is someone or people who keeps remaking Heyuri threads on 4chan boards

It's slightly older, but it's something that was b& on 4/jp/
https://warosu.org/jp/?task=search2&ghost=false&search_text=cat+look+like+janny&search_subject=&search_username=&search_tripcode=&search_email=&search_filename=&search_datefrom=&search_dateto=&search_media_hash=&search_op=all&search_del=dontcare&search_int=dontcare&search_ord=old&search_capcode=all&search_res=post

>There is someone or people who keeps remaking Heyuri threads on 4chan boards
not sure about this specific case but that cross-site worm hole has been happening for a while

>>67415
>/jp/ meme from 2014
Actually from 2011. Back when Saegrimr's cat died (Saegrimr was a /jp/ janitor). /jp/sies really didn't like him so when he once posted a pic of his late cat someone compared it to Botero's painting. Saegrimr didn't find it amusing and started deleting any post that mentioned that. Saegrimr stopped being a janitor years ago, but /jp/ anons still post that meme from time to time
>>67416
>was b& on 4/jp/
That's because Saegrimr couldn't take a joke

Do you think Saegrimr would lurk on Heyuri?

ｷﾀ━━━(ﾟ∀ﾟ)━━━!!

Anonymous ## Mod 2024/09/07(Sat)14:11:16 ID:MODERATOR No.67388

I don't really liek it when n00bs post meta threads to Off-Topic - moved to Site Discussion!

Sounds like ur just complaining for complaining's sake - the big flood attack was months ago, only affected one board (a fast-paced board that is all about making new threads anyway), and was being handled by staff-san immediately. There was nothing that could be done to defend against the attack at that time since every post was from a new IP, and dozens of posts were being spat out by the second. Countermeasures have been worked on since then by volunteer developers, and kaguya disabling automatic thread purging (for the time being) is another helpful measure

Not to mention that "threads not being auto-purged" is exactly how Off-Topic has been for much of its existence (see: the "INFINITE THREADS" and "kaguya manually deletes old threads when he feels like" eras)

>Countermeasures have been worked on since then by volunteer developers
there was actually a countermeasure already before the spambot attacked, but apparently it had a vulnerability that has since (probably - we will know when they fail) been fixed

Anonymous ## Mod  SAGE! 2024/09/07(Sat)14:27:30 ID:MODERATOR No.67390

Also worth mentioning is that for a very long time, the "marked for deletion (old)" feature was b0rked - it would only appear on threads that were 30+ days old, regardless of the fact they'd entered time-based (<-- STFU PUCHIKO!!!!1) autosage

In addition to that, boards other than Off-Topic had time-based autosage enabled on them because a certain off-site group of fags were intentionally bumping 1-2 pages worth of ancient threads to make it difficult to see new threads/replies

That's why ur more likely to see "marked for deletion (old)" these days

I don't know what OP is going on about with the threads on /b/.

if a thread is marked for deletion then if you're gonna post in it, no one is gonna see it, as it should be ┐(ﾟ～ﾟ)┌

everything on the first 10 pages (the old page limit) is within 20 days old, and if you're seeing a lack of new threads, that's because you're not posting them (since you can't bump old threads)
you rarely saw threads fall off the bottom before without being marked for deletion, so it's not like anything has changed there ヽ(ﾟρﾟ)ノ

>After that, there's no point in replying to older threads
That's like it has always been even before the mark for deletion was introduced
It's a byproduct of the small user base. Once the 10-15 regulars have said all they can say about a topic the thread is done for

Where

Heyuri got filtered by the red line and gave up

...u did join the International instance, rite? There's still a ton of us there

this is the 2nd townhall in a row I could not attend because of a wedding.

>>67401
so is heyuri predicting weddings, or are the weddings predicting townhall dates?

It's been said in this thread already, but teh reason wordfilters wouldn't work out is the certain words warnings triggers being usual English words
Warnings give the last saying about their post content to the user, and it's made clear there can be false positives already

Im gonna say cringe in all my posts bc i wanna see puchiko's face again

>>67374
>Im gonna say cringe in all my posts bc i wanna see puchiko's face again
goddamn, she's cute there lol

part of me has a visceral disgust reaction to seeing the warning and I suspect incoming users will too
but it is a neat feature honestly (´人｀)

>>67371
This. Just filter every crossie no-no word as "I'M A HUGE FAGGOT PLEASE RAPE MY FACE" so even false positives within serious posts are funny and the poster gets the message loud and clear, thus naturally phasing out these words eventually.

Obscene wordfilters would be the best option in spite of the false positives "issue". I'd say that too.... perhaps it would organically drive heyurizens to diverge Linguistically and create words to avoid false positives ヽ(´ー｀)ノ

Puchiko has told you already, but you would not listen

you have been judged nyu

the sentence is DEATH

>>67370
Puchiko already knows what youre about to say even before you post. Shes more powerful than any moderator or government.

wait... there is a catalog on heyuri??

>>67379
i forgot it existed and it took me a while to locate it after seeing this photo, it's a link in the menu

is “baby boomer” allowed?

Unfortunately baby boomer and "boomers" are actually what that generation has called themselves for decades.
Calling something "boomer" just because it is slightly old or something should be r8 though, as in "boomer shooter" or "30 year old boomer" same with any -er "coomer" "doomer" "zoomer" etc..

>>67361

I actually agree with you but i was using it in its proper context my Japanese friend is actually that old.

Anonymous ## Mod 2024/09/02(Mon)19:29:43 ID:MODERATOR No.67363

There's no report feature currently

However, a report would only get seen when staff-san are looking at the site - and if we're looking at the site, we'll have already seen it

if you see pizza you can close the tab or scroll past, a staff-san will delete it when they get around to it. you don't need to report/complain about it
>and if we're looking at the site, we'll have already seen it
that's true! i wish more people making these threads would realize it

honestly, the easiest way to reach a staff member about this kind of thing is the CGI chat, especially if it got pushed down too much to see on /all/

https://cgi.heyuri.net/chat/

how does it deal with quoted quotes? (not that anyone really does it)

>>Does it werk with names?

It just gets teh latest post with matching string of whatever is in the quote like this:
>a

in case of post numbers, these work:
>No.67349
>No. 67349
but not this:
>67349
also filename has to be full with extension, so ">filename" wouldn't werk for filename.png - it has to be ">filename.png"

>Allowed file types are:

He uses ChatGPT to write code

Temporary measure against spammers messing up the bump order

Baleeted the duplicate - arigatou for adding more shows!

...we should probably come up with a consistent naming scheme

For my nominations, I went with whatever the anime was best known as in the English-speaking fandom when it was most relevant - a lot of "VHS era" anime are more commonly known by their English titles, whereas I think once internet fansubs grew in popularity and sites like MAL took off, Japanese titles started being more commonplace (at least online)

We could just do "Japanese Title / English Title" (or the other way around), but it might be a little crowded

I don't think that rly matters, but it could be good if it checked the MAL links for shows are already in the list. Just in case, it could also use not allowing "anime.php?id=number" links, and only allowing "anime/number/title" links for MAL

>I don't think that rly matters, but it could be good if it checked the MAL links for shows are already in the list. Just in case, it could also use not allowing "anime.php?id=number" links, and only allowing "anime/number/title" links for MAL
I ChatGPT-san updated it so that it now does these things - in fact it even strips out "?" and anything after it prior to checking the validity and preexistence of MAL links

Neat, thanks!

it's to expensive to run such script. needs a lot of server power

we dont have enough computers for that

maybe we could barrow one from library?

Idiot. Last time we tried that the principle got really mad

it was your idea to put a PENIS as a wallpaper...