make it so that you can only upload audio formats

I liek the idea, but I'm not sure how to create a new board on it, its code is a bit messy.
I'll look into it soon

make it mp3 only!!

...why would you want that?

Do the mods seriously have crushes on random people larping as little girls? Enough to let them trash up the whole board?

>>65628
Have u ever contributed anything original here anon?

I have a sneaky suspicion that nan nan is simply Mod-sama in disguise, reliving the joy of being a bratty 11 year old hyperactive loli with sodie pop and cocaine running through her bulging veins. Refresco?

>Do the mods seriously have crushes on random people larping as little girls?
Maybe u should learn what LARP stands for before using it

>being a bratty 11 year old hyperactive loli with sodie pop and cocaine running through her bulging veins

I can't say much more than this, but listen: I talked with Mod-sama over Omegle (before it shut down) and Mod-sama is actually a 40 year old washed up hag working as a salarywoman who relives her glory days as a loli on the internet! And she has huge tits!

Oh shit... I think she might've heard that... I gotta go, guys.

I just deleted few posts off /o/, but I intend it to be one-time thing so there isn't a reason for c. from >>61789 to happen. It is something I was worrying about as well

>>61788
If it's the inactivity of it that turns you off, I'd suggest still checking it from time to time, at least whenever you feel like it. Actually, right now is a perfect time

>>61789
Now I understand what you complained there was more about some users were trying to force some lame characters they drawing to /o/, but you say:
>treating Heyuri like it was their own dumping ground for all their crappy low-effort drawings without considering that maybe other users don't want to see an entire page of shitty, low quality, not-even-having-the-decency-to-provide-LOLs OC DONUT STEEL
I completely agree, but don't think this one has much to do with the "personal" part of your message. Noone would have a reason to make such a deal of it if they were simply OC characters doing fun things, as there is no obligation to draw some character from existing series. That's why I think "personal doodlepads" is a fitting word in this case

>>61792
>they drawing
they were drawing*
that sentence was particularly hard to write out..

After learning from my mistake, I guess so!

Should we step in again?

>Should we step in again?
I don't think so - the only doodle lately that's even close to being on par with the crap that caused this thread to be made is pic related, and it's just one pic rather than multiple pages of pics made in relatively quick succession

That being said, I swear to god they always intentionally wait for somebody to draw something freaking amazing before "gracing" us with their two-second turds that sit at the top of the index for ages...

Looking at the 20 most recently bumped threads on Off-Topic, there are loli pr0nz in only two of them. Only 10% of threads have it. If anything, I'm tired of this low percentage!

Agreed, needs moar shota

I'm tired of it to be quite honest
I don't care about teh lolis I just want to post on teh silly site

I was thinking we were a bit tame about posting loli lately, but looks like we can still get some compliments! ヽ(´∇`)ノ

>>65606
who's gonna tell him?

Posts gone now, thankfully

>Wiki got raided mod-sama!
Kaguya is dealing with it since I don't have any l33t powars on teh wiki

>I thought everyone on Heyuri was using TOR unsure I remember mod (or kaguya) even encouraging it
I've only encouraged VPNs personally. Most users post with seemingly bare IPs, then 2nd place is VPN/proxy users - Tor users are pretty rare, and from my observations it's primarily to cause trouble / facilitate ban evasion

well that was the lamest raid

>>65586
kinda difficult to use TOR with all the spam and shennanigans going on and people abusing it

please dont treat all TOR posters the same we're not all bad you know

There's too much abuse coming from TOR, s0z about the blocking. I feel bad for the users using it with a good faith
I do encourage using Tor/VPNs if you can afford it, but there is a good reason why a lot of Web 2.0 sites block interactions from TOR.

there must be some way of making Heyuri tor friendly while keeping out the undesirables. The way CP spam is being posted makes me believe its not automated. I've heard a janitor from another site say they think someone is manually posting that stuff and not using tor.

it would be a shame if Heyuri bans tor users Stallman wouldn't be able to visit our site

just do CTRL+F5

>>65583
But it's about the images, they're still the changed ones. You'd have to change them manually, or undo the change

NO U, MY TASTES ARE PERFECT!!1

You can see the nomination standings from here, it gives an idea about the next show we're going to watch: https://wiki.heyuri.net/index.php?title=Talk:Anime_Nominations
*if we go with one that's marked as (short), we will just combine it with another short anime to make up.

Most of teh nominations were made by me (including Kuuchuu Buranko), but it's Heyuri users as a whole who voted on which ones they wanted 2 watch - so if u haet teh shows, u can blame Heyuri users!

And most pplz who made it to the end of the shows - where we offer our scores/opinions - appeared to have enjoyed most of the shows we've watched so far

>>65517 This is worth noting too.
We tend to watch shows that majority is simply interested in the plot, not the shows we're sure that we would find good.

can we watch the rapeman next time?

>>65554
I added it to the list ヽ(´ー｀)ノ
https://wiki.heyuri.net/index.php?title=Anime_Nominations

i don't think so but it's lame either way

>>65552
you're mean (´￢`)

Typical /r9k/ whining shit. This is a place for fun people

No, but
CHEER UP, EMO KID!

Nice communication with the userbase, mods. Very quick and all

Rule 9 isn't simply for ornament

>>65537
What rule did asking if maybe someone screenshoted the first thread b0rk?

For the record, that specific post of the curious user didn't receive a ban. This is really another case of >>65300 so I'll lock these threads to prevent artificial drama and further loss of our time.

There is really no point in discussing why we shouldn't have B& a Rule 7 thread, so don't bother creating a new thread. Just talk about GTA in peace on Off-Topic if that's what you want to do

16 bit integer limit GET

There was nothing wrong with that thread. Mods are just being dumb again

>>65530
What was on the thread? (´～`)

>>65531
Just people jokingly sharing their opinion on the trailer

>>65532
(;´Д`) there has to be a better description!

>>65533
Dunno, maybe someone managed to take a screenshot before it was deleted? OP?

I'm still not sure if Parker-san is regarded as a nuisance or if he's embraced by the Heyuri community. Maybe a little bit of both? He did make a couple banners, didn't he? (I thought they were pretty cool).

>>65502
he's a funny nuisance!

Reverted ヽ(´ー｀)ノ

pl0x use teh source edit or else kaguya will give you a raeping and trust me, u wont liek it!!!!

If source editor is too hard, u can just post ur nominations here and I'll add them 4 u

554 bytes? Thats outrageous. I demand no more than 500 BITS

>I demand no more than 500 BITS
The HTML of ur post alone was almost 7 kilobits

pfft 640k should be enough for anyone there's no reason for it to be so huge

Fun fact: 3 bits is a kibble

>>65495
also,
>A string of four bits is a nibble.
- Wikipedia

Lets make it a centennial event :D

I'm 65150-san, no definitive date for Heyuri-tan quest, I got other stuff to deal with.

If I were to host a quest, I think I would probably deliver once per day. That would give moar time for anons to give ideas, and most importantly, for me to maek good quality drawings. Threads enter autosage in a 7 days, that wouldn't be long enough for me, I can't do it in a day like robo-kun-sama.

I considered multiple possibilities:
-create a new thread every week. Depending how on long the quest takes (i have no idea!!) it could be a pain in the ass, I might have to make a recap pic every time: I think one important point of a quest is the clarity, if anons get lost or forget what happened, it would die.
-mods use their superpowers to increase the thread lifespan, or at least modbump once in a while. Sticky might be too much.
-Hosting the quest on /o/, but not many people go there. （ ´,_ゝ`） Also the interface isn't optimal.

What do you guys think?

Also, robo-kun, what could have been elegant penguin-san's role in your quest? I'm dying to know!

>>65422
doing one update a day is probably best. I found out the hard way that writing and drawing many updates in a day is difficult! (;ﾟ∀ﾟ)
I think an ongoing quest thread would be great fun, but some might find it annoying to see the same thread bumped up to the top of the front page for days or weeks on end. idk the best way to handle that.
and as for elegant penguin-san's true purpose... maybe we'll find out next time! [ -c°▥°]-c

>I found out the hard way
おつかれさまロボくん
>some might find it annoying to see the same thread bumped up to the top of the front page for days or weeks on end.
I thought about that too. Even worse, I realized "creating a new thread every week" option probably goes against rule 6. (;´Д`)
>we'll find out next time

test