all a / b / c / f / h / jp / l / o / q / s / sw / lounge cgi up wiki
[Home] [Catalog] [Search] [Inbox] [Write PM] [Admin]
(for deletion, 8 chars max)
  • Allowed file types are: gif, jpg, jpeg, png, bmp, swf, webm, mp4
  • Maximum file size allowed is 50000 KB.
  • Images greater than 250 * 250 pixels will be thumbnailed.
■▼
File: ty645634.png
(898 KB, 1563x774)[ImgOps]
898 KB
No.65964 [Reply]
I dont like it.
Marked for deletion (Old)
>>
No.65966
Go into [Settings] and uncheck "Gallery mode"

That option has existed forevar and it's unchecked by default, so I think u may have just accidentally enabled it somehow unsure
■▲▼
File: 1668203065874.png
(105 KB, 360x360)[ImgOps]
105 KB
No.65957 [Reply]
https://dis.heyuri.net/lounge/koko.php?res=9641
r8? pretty sure it's a bunch of nu-4chan memes put together
Marked for deletion (Old)
>>
No.65958
only part that seems r8 is "BVLL" as i've seen people from r8 site use that term before
>>
No.65959
it's sissy cuck fetish bullshit with a slight hint of interracial fetish. the kinda stuff that they use to troll the political types on 4chan. you might consider it rule 7 or rule 8
>>
No.65984
unrelated but I enjoy these types of posts because they make pollacks mad biggrin
■▲▼
File: calibrating visuals.gif
(2486 KB, 540x504)[ImgOps]
2486 KB
No.65917 [Reply]
I'm interested in seeing recent post stats. The /b/ user counter usually remains around 10, but i've seen it stick around higher numbers more and more
Marked for deletion (Old)
>>
No.65920
File: off-topic monthly post counts 2024-01-04.png
(45 KB, 1027x671)[ImgOps]
45 KB
I has this, updated a few days ago
■▲▼
File: 59c0bc9ce5e51132d0c71820fae345e2.gif
(452 KB, 352x240)[ImgOps]
452 KB
No.65899 [Reply]
my opinion is that saying "silly" in a nu-internet sort of way should be considered a rule 8 violation
Marked for deletion (Old)
5 posts omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
No.65908
>>65904
"buzzword" is a buzzword! xp
>>
No.65909
ok sorry just forget i said anything sad
>>
No.65912
i actually do get what u are saying, OP. but from what i have seen on social media, people use "silly :3" to make people mad and not for the LOLs which is rule 8. i dont think people on here (mainly cosmo)'s intention to make people mad on purpose, and just like that word to describe things. i could be wrong tho i havent checked in a while ┐(ﾟ～ﾟ)┌

tho that being said, if someone does use "silly :3" 2 make ppl mad on purpose they should get teh b&
>>
No.65914
>>65912
People do it to make others mad??
I do it bcz it's a good way of getting my hyper fixation joy out into words without just key smashing nyaoo-closedeyes
>>
No.65915
I never seen a person in heyuri saying sillyclosed-eyesand if they did, there were too few to even consider it
■▲▼
File: 205d206a0706bb863f6517865ba0a069.jpg
(9 KB, 250x250)[ImgOps]
9 KB
No.65905 [Reply]
even after bull shit. why is cgi and main site dying.
Marked for deletion (Old)
>>
No.65906
...they're not unsure
>>
No.65907
>>65906
The most they got to "dying" yesterday was just.. Not loading as fast as usual. Site still worked
>>
No.65910
it was taking almost 30 seconds to load for me at one pointdark
>>
No.65911
>>65910
>almost 30 seconds
That would've been considered fast back in 2004 nyaoo-closedeyes
>>
No.65913
>That would've been considered fast back in 2004
Yup - especially if it was a Flash site or some type of media file. Howevar, using computers up until that point had often meant occasionally leaving to do something else while something loaded, so it wasn't too outrageous xd
■▲▼
File: Untitled459_20240106184408.png
(157 KB, 357x500)[ImgOps]
157 KB
No.65884 [Reply]
https://img.heyuri.net/b/koko.php?res=88796
Rule 8,, they literally used a word described as rule 8 angry
Marked for deletion (Old)
■▲▼
File: kneel.png
(395 KB, 2125x659)[ImgOps]
395 KB
No.65863 [Reply]
https://img.heyuri.net/b/koko.php?res=88669#p88685

"I kneel" is a nu4chan meme/slang

https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/i-kneel-kneeling-vegeta
Marked for deletion (Old)
3 posts omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
No.65868
>>65867
>twitterfags
Say twittards, it's more fun!!
>>
No.65870
File: group_discipline.jpg
(110 KB, 561x800)[ImgOps]
110 KB
That was me... gomen, I didn't realize it was a nu-4chan meme. sweat2

Rest assured, the staff has taken turns thoroughly disciplining me for this mistake. blush
>>
No.65873
[X] GENUFLECT
>>
No.65894
bump test
>>
No.65945
>>65868
no fag!
■▲▼
File: konnato002.gif
(291 KB, 179x100)[Animated GIF][ImgOps]
291 KB
No.65885 [Reply]
Seems as threads doesn't bump on /b/ as supposed. Rather weird.
Marked for deletion (Old)
2 posts omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
No.65889
File: Screenshot 2024-01-06 at 23-18-36 Site D(…).png
(250 KB, 991x820)[ImgOps]
250 KB
ｷﾀ━━━(ﾟ∀ﾟ)━━━!!
>>
No.65890
File: pic_0299-3261866177.jpg
(35 KB, 480x272)[ImgOps]
35 KB
Only you can save us, KAGUYA-HERO-SAMA!

Also error posting - get error 520 from cloudflare everytime i post. Unsure if this helps.
>>
No.65891
error 524*`
seems i posted that post 2-3 times before it got uploaded a 1min or so later...
>>
No.65892
File: 6803.jpg
(199 KB, 526x880)[ImgOps]
199 KB
I am actually not 100% sure that it will fix itself, but let's hope for teh best for now sweat2

>Also error posting - get error 524 from cloudflare everytime i post
I don't see any issues about with CF or on the server unsure
>>
No.65893
I didn't have any issues posting the above either, so I assume it was a momentary thing
■▲▼
File: namioto.png
(1361 KB, 1366x768)[ImgOps]
1361 KB
No.65887 [Reply]
testing something related to >>65885
Marked for deletion (Old)
■▲▼
File: IMG_3459.jpg
(34 KB, 600x600)[ImgOps]
34 KB
No.65874 [Reply]
Do we really need two different threads for attention whoring? I think one is more than enough (´～`)
Marked for deletion (Old)
3 posts omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
No.65879
>need moar threads!
better GOOD threads than many spammed piss threads. this must be anonwaha
>>
No.65880
Lurk moar xd
>>
No.65881
>>65878
>>65879
ironic doublepost lol x3
>>
No.65882
>>65876
Sorry Mr Kaguya (;´Д`)
>>
No.65883
The fact people said "oh it's ai genereated" is dumb, wonky architecture exists most in Arab countries ┐(ﾟ～ﾟ)┌
■▲▼
File: I miss heyuri!!.png
(1380 KB, 1920x1080)[ImgOps]
1380 KB
No.65869 [Reply]
I just can't access it right now it's a total white screen (;´Д`)
Marked for deletion (Old)
>>
No.65871
CGI DOWN CGI DOWN
>>
No.65872
Teh server got knocked offline somehow, but I restarted it and it seems fine - hopefully it was just coincidence unsure
■▲▼
File: moralfag.png
(58 KB, 632x256)[ImgOps]
58 KB
No.62115 [Reply]
I think one problem we will have to face up to more and more as Heyuri gains popularity is the problem of moralfaggotry. You know, people hopped up on the overriding philosophy of nu-chan and the popular net. That philosophy of "Internet is Serious Business.", which causes them to recoil at the sight of unfettered LOLs, to fail to understand plain sarcasm, and to make it their mission to shit up a thread so they can go on some faggy moral crusade.
You probably already know who I'm talking about, and can probably already guess the two types of moralfags we're likely to run into, so I won't bury the lead.
We don't see many moralfags from the liberal set,since their concept of imageboards begins ends at 4chan and they're too scared to explore anywhere else (last I remember is that tranny posting Bridget. How the fuck did he even get here?dark)
What we do see a bit of, and will probably see more of in the future, is idpol obssessed 2016 election tourists, who consider it their duty to stamp out 'degeneracy', 'tranime' and any LOLs they may encounter along the way closed-eyes2
Heyuri is in particular danger, because of our front and center interest in lolis,our refusal to spend all day arguing about idpol talking points, and our refusal of wojak/oomer monstrosities, which is the main way moralfags beat you over the head with their opinions these days.sweat3
So what do you think we can do about this, if anything? I mean, even before the recent surge, there were some people derailing JC threads, even right NOW there are people shitting up such threads, see >>31277
I feel like under no politics there should be an addendum that insists on no moralfaggotry, but at the same time I feel like that would be too vague, and not so useful.unsure
I don't know, I feel like if we're too easy-going about it the zoomer moralfags will outnumber everyone else and this will become just another shitty imageboard devoid of all LOLs.cry
Marked for deletion (Old)
42 posts omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
No.65831
>>65829
i actually read one of my own posts and thought: "wow, i made such a good job on that one that someone else saved it and copied it"
Ignorance is bliss cry
>>
No.65833
>>65829
wait a minute,, your righjt
>>
No.65860
ty for reviving this! completely agree with the topic...xd
also kewl that our wee board is back on teh menudance
>>
No.65861
>>65860
and ofc 1st post fails harwtsweat2
>>
No.65862
test
■▲▼
File: yomi1.png
(1010 KB, 1440x1080)[ImgOps]
1010 KB
No.65858 [Reply]
Mod sama plz remove https://img.heyuri.net/b/koko.php?res=88437&q=88492#postform ! It's a DISGUSTING addition to my perfectly good thread
Marked for deletion (Old)
>>
No.65859
fair enough!
■▲▼
File: fuck.png
(2 KB, 254x92)[ImgOps]
2 KB
No.65856 [Reply]
What happened to gurochan?
Marked for deletion (Old)
>>
No.65857
It will be back up ASAP
https://nitter.cz/kaguyarou/status/1743022942995304873
■▲
File: 1232723465009.png
(7 KB, 355x349)[ImgOps]
7 KB
No.65432 [Reply]
mod sama please remove cp
https://img.heyuri.net/b/koko.php?res=81670

tor users gonna get banned now for a few hours cry
Marked for deletion (Old)
19 posts omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
No.65798
>>65797
i got it friend ヽ(´ー｀)ノ
>>
No.65848
https://img.heyuri.net/b/koko.php?res=88009
88023 and 88021 are cp, right?
I'm all in favor 4 oc, but ocp (original child porn) is kinda problematic, right? unsuremona2
>>
No.65849
What makes you think it's cp? It's impossible to verify
I think if we don't give a benefit of doubt here we wouldn't evar have camwhores. Either way I think he looks old enough to not cause us troubles.
>>
No.65850
Doesn't look underageb& to me
>>
No.65851
>>65848
On an ethical level it probably isn't any worse or better (however you could make cp better ethically is beyond me) but on a not wanting to get shut down by the powers that be level it's probably worse as it likely makes the site look worse.
Delete post: []
[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] [29] [30] [31] [32] [33] [34] [35] [36]