ｷﾀ━━━(ﾟ∀ﾟ)━━━!!

ｷﾀ━━━(ﾟ∀ﾟ)━━━!!

ｷﾀ━━━(ﾟ∀ﾟ)━━━!!

ｷﾀ━━━(ﾟ∀ﾟ)━━━!!

ｷﾀ━━━(ﾟ∀ﾟ)━━━!!

>she's still teenaged
o yeah? well, so is mine

AND MINE IS 12

* 4-san is now speechless *

i-it can't be.... *dies*

i just have an oneechan that barely talks to me anymore.

>barely talks to me anymore.
oh noes

ｷﾀ━━━(ﾟ∀ﾟ)━━━!!

ｷﾀ━━━(ﾟ∀ﾟ)━━━!!

ｷﾀ━━━(ﾟ∀ﾟ)━━━!!

ｷﾀ━━━(ﾟ∀ﾟ)━━━!!

ｷﾀ━━━(ﾟ∀ﾟ)━━━!!

I once considered getting into it, but there were too many buttans

3 quectoseconds give or take

what in the motherfuck is a quectosecond

ｷﾀ━━━(ﾟ∀ﾟ)━━━!!

ｷﾀ━━━(ﾟ∀ﾟ)━━━!!

ｷﾀ━━━(ﾟ∀ﾟ)━━━!!

Why is the other one in underwear?

another victory for Jamal

That man sounds like he's very far away from home.

can someone translate into english please

Westerners: touching girls is illegal.
Also westerners: why birth rate is going down?

>>153964
I'm sorry to inform you, you're dating a fag
if you're gonna give yourself cancer, just smoke teh cigs (｀～´)

>Why wouldn't you date a smoker?
Because you have to be an adult to smoke, and I pick up my dates at the playground!

>>154000
yeah kids dont smoke, they vape!

>>153993
>you're dating a fag
believe me i know

>>153941
So that you can ask

kewl!

HYDRA DOMINATUS!

>>153930
NOOOO!!!! Not this again!! please!!!

yeah （ ´_ゝ`）

he does look like he has aids

>>153920
He didn't have AIDS. Nancy was just eating all the grub.

４０４になったか

もう接続できなくなった

https://youtu.be/-Mdg2zRXZ7g?si=57edl5hzTt_cRoDa

まさかのソジャックをここで見かけるとは

今振り返るとあと五ヶ月で二周年だったのか
ちょっと後ろ髪惹かれる思いだな
だけど受験機と被るしな、消しといたほうが無難ではあったのかもしれない
この掲示板によく書き込みに来てくれていた人がいたんだけど
その人元気にやってるかなあ

ちなみに、XにあやしいBotというのがいるんですがそれ僕です。
作った動画もここに乗せておこうかな
ぜひ築いた人いたら見に来てみてください＾＾
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mlcFMeHSB-M

受験期なら仕方ないさ。その気になったらいつも復活できるし
管理人の都合で開設したり閉鎖したりするのはあやしいわーるど、って昔どこかで読んだ覚えがある(´ー`)
面白い動画を作ってくれてありがとう

i am both scared and aroused...

fat belly!

I met an old, fat spider,
Spinning in her tree.
I said, "Hey old, fat spider,
I bet you can't catch me!
You've grown too fat you lazy lob,
You're just an old Tomnoddy!
Hey Attercop!
Hey Attercop!
You can't catch anybody!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rKdsBlRNgX0

>>14749
not a single post was ever made lol

>>14818
Bad idea. This wouldn't block any spam once they figure out that you can't post links. Remember that you are fighting with humans, not bots. If anything this would only inconvenience regular users.
Around a year ago i added a few regex filters made by a moderator of some altchan that "stop 90% of CP bots" or something like that. And it did for a short period of time, then they learned how to get around it.
>and block people typing like "mega dot nz"
That's impossible.

>>14830
>That's impossible
No it isn't

>>14830
For one thing removing links will keep link farms away. I experimented with moderating threads by not making them accesible through the catalog before and i'm curious what you think about the idea of "spoilering" individual posts. The intent would be preventing the content from showing up in search engines and making it less visible to users, while keeping moderation transparent. Illegal pseudo-links would of course need be removed manually.
>>14820
>it'd be nice to see a classic spam filter in software too
I'm developing a small, modular, qmail-inspired board software written in C. Version 0 already lets you easily invoke a milter (if you know execline, it's a single line in the https://github.com/zerobbs-dev/zerobbs-v0/blob/main/http-post-thread and the reply cgi script), but i'm still working on a successor system with cleaner interfaces and support for an imageposting configuration.

>>14832
You're right, but it's a matter of handing out bans for either posting links or evading filters.

>>153490
born and raised Yankee, and now I'm so far south that it's culturally northern here lol

yeehaw

>>153495
GIT OUTTA OUR LAND YA DAMN CARPETBAGGER

YEEHAW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1

>>153753
god bless america!

#freefubuki

I justify my piracy by asking myself "if I was the artist, how would I feel if someone downloaded my content without paying for it?" I've made art before, and I've never made art with the intention of profiting from it. I'm just happy when other people enjoy it. ヽ(´ー｀)ノ

Now, if someone took my art and fed it into a machine that bastardized it, but it was for their own purposes, I don't think I'd care either. If they made profits doing it, ripping off my art and selling it, then that definitely would upset me.

So yeah I do hope OpenAI and other AI companies do get fucked in the ass legally over the AI copyright question. But I'm glad we can still torrent movies without too much trouble.

Listen sometimes theres these weird little guys, lets call them goblins

First theres the Localizer goblin. they like to take media from other countries, and change the material, and then attempt to sell it to you.
They like to scam you by altering the original works for whatever reasons (power rangers... jelly donut, anyone?)
The Localizer goblin thinks he knows whats best for you, he wants to control your thoughts and opinions by changing the messages of the media you consume.


Second, theres the other class of goblin, called the copyright goblin.

The copyright goblin loves to buy up the rights to foreign media, usually in package deals, and then sit on the material, and do nothing with it, while at the same time, viciously protect the rights they hold.

The copyright goblin revels in the fact that he can lock out (and effectively censor) entire series or movies, or even game franchises from your country just by signing a simple contract with a foreign publisher (who might have mistakenly thought the goblin wanted to honestly share the media with people, instead of hoard it).

anyone with creativity in their heart would never support fucked up little goblins like these.

This is one of annoying topics
Copyrights are made up and have no basis in reality

Theft cannot be committed unless:
1. Thief rids the owner of the thing
2. Thief acquires of the thing
If one is not true than theft is not true as copying does not rid anyone from anything. Copying is good for the author because someone else back it up free of charge.

The fact that authors get angry at their work being copied freely is because they are monopolistic autocrats that want to exclusively control the market without a merit, all who interfere with the market shall be fed lead at a high velocity.

They will assault the market, there is nothing more sacred than the market which is the purest reflection of liberty and needs of humans from which everything grows and without which nothing can grow*. Items on the market are human labour stored as physical items, currency is the standardised quantification of labour. If I do labour by copying and pasting information (like copyrighted material) and offering a service of copying and pasting it to client's drive cheaper than the original author then the market shall judge and decide who is a better source. No theft has been committed, no crime involved, no liberty violated, therefore fine.

If the author wants to charge exclusively then they should make it unfeasably hard like key-activation, or like money is hard to scan and reprint. Another solution is to never publish, or publish to people who of their own volition respect "copyrights" where it is safe, not to general public. Information is like genie - once you let it out - it won't go back to the jar! No author should be surprised that once they print a book - people do reprints and scans and quote it. For this reason I say no liberty violated, because writing/drawing and publishing is a choice.

*Market as a term for assigning value and fulfilling needs in general. External markets like shops, malls, global trade that consist of many humans regulate their needs on their respective level on an interpersonal level. There is something I call internal market; where you assign your priorities based on speculative profits! You for example assign value of your limited and time pick particular tasks among many possible to do based on their speculative value (fapping instead of having a job)!>>153713

>>153713
Videos that encourage piracy without an educational element get b& in burgerland instantly

>>153839
>Ah! How bout this? Paying for the work that someone does on a non-physical asset like art or a software is a form of respect!
>That's simple enough for me!
The rawest, most primal statement without any dogma or illusion of universal applicability!
"I give you my support because I like what you do, and I WANT you to feel good about doing it!"
That's excellent !

Should I sage this? This thread is getting old so if someone, anyone thinks this is annoying just tell me.

>>153868
HUZZAH! Validation

>>153844

So what you are describing is a world without copyright laws which sounds scary at first but maybe it would be just fine?
To start off that means anybody can make an animation, video game, mascot, etc... of Mickey Mouse, call it official too and throw on the Disney signature.
Nothing stops them.
However because there's no law about copying digital work. No digital asset makes much money anymore. Other than exclusive live sharing of that digital media. Once it can be stored as a file, it can be shared.
It will be only the quality that will distinguish legitimate work from frauds.
Imagine that, every shared media will be like sharing on an anonymous imageboard. It's difficult to identify it as 'yours'.
Well... mind you things like internet accounts, websites and providers of such may make restrictions on names and signatures much like twitter handles or imageboard names.
So maybe it would work out just fine.
If it weren't for jerks we wouldn't need these laws anyway.