my walls are starting to crack (;´Д`) someone in there's watching me jerk off

ｷﾀ━━━(ﾟ∀ﾟ)━━━!!

Heyuri-tan was browsing the webs when she realized it was her birthday! What will she do?????

(；_；)

YURI BATTLE

IT IS SO HOT, IT IS 30 DEGREES OUTSIDE AND HIGHER IN MY ROOM.
THE HEAT HAS MADE ALL THE FILTH IN MY ROOM EXUDE NOXIOUS FUMES.
I AM SO HOT.
I WANT IT TO BE COLD AGAIN.
I LONGED FOR SUMMER JUST COUPLE WEEKS AGO AND NOW I SEVERELY REGRET THIS WISH, I AM BURNING, I AM BEING COOKED.

ｷﾀ━━━(ﾟ∀ﾟ)━━━!!

She made a cake for you!

Your fortune: Only time will tell

I finally learned to roll my r's! Now I won't sound like an idiot while learning Spanish.

ｷﾀ━━━(ﾟ∀ﾟ)━━━!!

About three weeks ago, I promised that the following day, I would make a post the following day about a big update. I didn't say what it was about at the time, but it was going to be about the Excitation plus Resonance model. Unfortunately, I was not able to make the post at the time, and am sorry for that. However, I do have a significant update now.

Back in April, I began to implement the Excitation plus Resonance model. The Excitation plus Resonance is model of the voice timbre spectrum. It consists of several parts actually, but the two main ones in terms of implementation difficult are the source curve and vocal tract resonances.

The source curves approximates the frequency-domain response of the voice source, and the resonances correspond roughly to formants and are model using a modified version of the Klatt Formant. The problem lies not in implementing this model - it is actually very easy to do so - but rather estimating the parameters for this model, which is not given in any of the papers I've read. Back in April, I spent a couple days trying to create it. Ultimately, I came up with something that was quite poor quality, very slow, and required very specific parameters but accepted it. Much later though, I found that the exact method to estimate the source curve is actually given in the expired EpR patent.

Not wanting to repeat my previous mistake, when I began to work on EpR, I searched extensively for the method used to estimate the resonances, but came up with nothing. Eventually, I began to trying figure it out myself. I started by recreating the data in the paper by annotating an image extracted from the paper in Photoshop and then running a python script on said annotated images. I would then compared the result of my approach on said recreated data to the paper's.

I actually had been thinking about it long before my first attempt. I already had a method that I had conceived of. The main idea of this method was that the reciprocal of the second derivative could be used to approximate the bandwidths of the resonances.

Initially, after having to make a few adaptions to the approach after realizing several things wouldn't work quite how I thought, the results vastly outperformed my initial expectations. There were several ideas that didn't work out, but overall I felt good at the end of the first day. I debated whether to continue trying or to just go with what I had. I decided that would go with what I had and make a post about it the following d

Comment too long, view post No.183892 to see the full comment.

My posters have arrived ｷﾀ━━━(・∀・)━━━!!

thx

I'm on a boat (I'm on a boat)
I'm on a boat (I'm on a boat)
Everybody look at me, 'cause I'm sailing on a boat (Sailing on a boat)
I'm on a boat (I'm on a boat)
I'm on a boat
Take a good, hard look at the motherfucking boat

chen