all a / b / c / f / h / jp / l / o / q / s / sw / lounge cgi up wiki
[Home] [Catalog] [Search] [Inbox] [Write PM] [Admin]
[Return]

Posting mode: Reply
(for deletion, 8 chars max)
  • Allowed file types are: gif, jpg, jpeg, png, bmp, swf, webm, mp4
  • Maximum file size allowed is 50000 KB.
  • Images greater than 200 * 200 pixels will be thumbnailed.
We will hold the 12th Townhall next Saturday (5th) 19:00 UTC [Info] [Countdown]
File: depvana.topic.jpg
(48 KB, 640x360)[ImgOps]
48 KB
No.116134
The concept is simple. A place where people can create and discover topics in a structured way. Each topic serves as a digital room where people can post content such as text, images, webm and voice chat. Each topic can have subtopics related to the parent topic but of more specific nature. Subtopics can again have subtopics etc.

Everyone can make topic room about anything at all and everyone can post content. You can post anonymously without logging in.

Hopefully you could try it out and let me know what you think. Maybe try to do some posts or make new topics about something you care about. Experiment all you want. Any feedback and suggestions for improvement are highly appreciated.

The site is: https://depvana.com

feedback: https://depvana.com/topic/4

Of cause no censorship.

Best,
Marked for deletion (Old)
>>
No.116135
while in idea it seems somewhat interesting, the modern social media looking ui is putting me off.
good luck but I'll stick to bbs and imageboards nagato
>>
No.116136
These "modern" sites have an UI harder to use than an UFO dark

Quoting posts like ">>post123" format is also weird in my opinion. If it's inspired by BBSes anyways, I'd stick with traditional way of posts being "No.123" and quoting them to be done like ">No.123" or ">>No.123" if you insist using double ">"
>>
No.116139
no offense but this looks like reddit, visually
>>
No.116140
are you the same guy? i swear i've talked to you in like 2 different sites
>>
No.116142
>>116139
Not only does it look like reddit, it also functions like reddit but with slight differences.
But not having an account system is a good thing in my opinion, it's just one of the things that makes reddit worse (mostly the karma system)
Are "topics" moderated by their creators somehow or by one global moderator?
>>
No.116144
File: Untitled Project.webm
(749 KB, 128x96)
749 KB
>>116135
>>116136
>>
No.116156
I remember finding this website 2 months ago, but it looks boring as fuck.
>>
No.116165
>>116144
who keeps posting this
>>
No.116190
>>116139
The concept is the same as reddit too, just without having to log in. I think it's a pretty cool idea. OP should maybe consider that spamming his website everywhere isn't a good way to get it off the ground though.
>>
No.128794
awesome
>>
No.128795
Thank you everyone for the great feedback, it's much appreciated.

>>116136
yeah it's tricky what to be used as indicating respectively quoting a post, and when a post is a reply. Like your suggestion, this is something we will think about.

>>116142
As of now there is no site global moderation apart from U.S law. Basically anything goes. For individual topics, the topic creator and people he invite to be mod, set moderation guidelines and can enforce these by removing a post from that specific topic. However when a post is removed, a placeholder remains and people can click on this and navigate to the OP user page and view the original post anyway. This makes it transparent what is removed by mods.

>>116190
I think feedback is important to change and improve the site. If you have some ideas how to get people to try it out and give some feedback, please let us know.

If you come to think of anything that would improve the site don't hold back, it's work in progress and your suggestions will very likely be implemented. Cheers,
Delete post: []