>some photos the nipples are censored but in others they are not.
FUKKEN SAVED

>>115780
The 18th image in 少女の夢, which is in the 外国少女写真集 category.

what the hell

truely an epic thread --->

>>115783
manko!

>>115775
governments that give a shit tend to look for intent to seek and especially saving it from what I've seen
so you probably wouldn't get vanned unless they've built up a case on you and this is enough (assuming it would be considered pornographic -- I ain't clicking that shit lol) to confirm a pattern of behavior, unless your government is reallly trying to look like they're doing something and "protecting the children"
but I also have no faith that they aren't just saving a big list of shit you've looked at in a file and are just waiting to be like "we did a sting on so and so sites" when really all they did was get enough dirt on you that you'll lose a case
used to be a nuts conspiracy sort of idea ages ago, but it's just too easy now, there is no reason for a first world government to not have the kind of information that Google or Microsoft has on you, probably acquired by just scraping from those two

one thing to note is that in the US, it is in fact legal to have nude images of U-18 individuals, they just can't be pornographic -- various nudism societies use this fact to their advantage
still, the burden of proof is absolutely on you for them to not be considered pornographic, and they probably will be
from cases I can half-remember, posed shots, spread legs, focus on the bits you aren't normally supposed to see (surprisingly it isn't the presence of them, but the focus on them!), etc, are a big factor in determining that, and modeling magazines appealing to lolicon interests will probably fall afoul of that for most juries (;´ω`)

tl;dr: probably not van worthy if you don't already actively seek out this sort of thing, but only probably, governments are cunts

continuing from >>115787
the Japanese govt doesn't give that much of a shit from what I've seen since they had their arm twisted to conform to international pressure regarding ero U-18 content (actual distribution of outright CP was legal there until 1999 IIRC, and possession was only criminalized in like 2010 or some shit, and then most of the stuff that killed off all the "all ages" clothed modeling agencies was prefectural rather than national from what I recall)
so a Japanese hosted site can absolutely have shit that's illegal damn near everywhere else lol and dodge trouble -- the person running the site could get taken to court under current Japanese law, it's just not likely though

either way, heyuri is hosted in the US, innit? it is probably bad news to have the link here lol ┐(ﾟ～ﾟ)┌

what is the horse thinking

they're getting their bare asses all over the seat

Ah man I clicked it. I think my life is probably over now. It wasn't all bad.

i find these photos to be relaxing and pleasant to look at than erotic

ehh i fapped but you guys got me stressed and i barely slept

>>115817
>ehh i fapped
ooh, that made it go from artistic to pornographic, guess you're going to jail
(`･ω･´)

>>115818
thats what makes the hypothetical situation of the outright banning of porn so fucked because absolutely anything can be pornographic to anyone. if porn was banned and someone took pictures of rocks for a living, and a cabal of rock fetishists decided it was the peak of rock porn creation and bought all their shit en masse, would they be arrested because theyre now a prolific, illegal pornographer?

obscenity laws, man, who needs em (´～`)

>>115819
>and a cabal of rock fetishists decided it was the peak of rock porn creation and bought all their shit en masse, would they be arrested because theyre now a prolific, illegal pornographer?
it is entirely possible that the fetishists would be arrested under these circumstances
although it is possible that they wouldn't be
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dost_test

some relevant bits
The Fifth Circuit of the United States departed from Dost with respect to the intent of the Defendant, concluding well that a given photo may constitute child pornography even if the photographer clearly had only asexual intent, and that likewise a photo of a child in a winter coat was not child pornography, even if a pedophile was sexually stimulated by the latter.[7]

so an image taken with visibly asexual intent could be deemed pornographic (which I would say is psychotic, you simply cannot have it be clear that the image is not made to be a sexual depiction and then declare it to be porn)
but, an image can be considered to be outright nonsexual and thus non pornographic even if a fetishist could get off to it (in your example, it would be a fucking rock, which is outright nonsexual)

really though, as far as I can tell, the laws are deliberately shit in this regard specifically so that everyone errs on the side of caution ┐(ﾟ～ﾟ)┌

>obscenity laws, man, who needs em (´～`)
god, don't get me started ヽ(`Д´)ノ
I outright believe that obscenity as a concept has no place in US law. It is an entirely vague, nebulous thing whose existence is solely to weaken the First Amendment (and target groups the government doesn't like) but outright should not be able to, being undefined and unmentioned in the Constitution.
other legal systems may not have the protections needed to keep it out, but the US visibly fucking does have the needed protections, and yet the case law says otherwise （ ´,_ゝ`）

that does remind me though, things considered to be CP don't need to be considered obscene to be illegal

stop growing up so fast!!! ヽ(`Д´)ノ

Interesting find

Ah yes, this website one of my boomer Japanese pedo friends sent me this link last year.

Welcome to the club OP.(Rule 8c: "boomer", WARN'D)

isn't this against site rules like dude wtf....

>>115853
yeah i feel like it should at least be on autosage.

Aww, I cant browse the site on tor. That's a shame. I'm interested in the history of lolita mags, and wanted to gather a list of the publishers and mag names, and maybe some of the less risque images.

>>115853
>>115855

Cry about it.

>>115853
>>115862
feel like ever since cosmo posted herself on here the site's slowly sliding into a pedo hangout more than anything

>>115874
every couple of weeks, there will be a thread where it's basically "look Heyuri, I'm a pedophile, let me look at little girls in compromising positions, here's something that may or may not cause the site to be in trouble/probably isn't legal for damn near anyone on the site", some people get annoyed that it's here (for admittedly real reasons), and then it fades away since the fact that it wasn't immediately deleted usually means it's just borderline illegal and no one is going to get disappeared in the night for it, and maybe our web host here doesn't give a shit either

it is all kind of very annoying though
\(´Д`)/

there's a bunch of shit I don't post here because I know it'll just encourage the section of the site that is comprised of shameless pedophiles
┐(ﾟ～ﾟ)┌

ultimately,

>>115874
Who?

i wonder what's in her backpack

>>115882
love confessions to her favorite heyurian

>>115877
You're right, but the good old days doesn't mean everything from the old days was good.

>>115885
says who?

>>115877
this is true though heyuri feels alot more pedo-geared then old 4chan ever was

>>115890
>You're right, but the good old days doesn't mean everything from the old days was good.
Well, I just did

ur annoying if ur faganon and too conscious of being a lolikon, and make posts coming close to violate https://img.heyuri.net/q/koko.php?res=65024#p65097
ur also annoying if you make kind of posts that bait faganon to reply to your posts and turn threads into legal/moral discussions!!1

>I cant browse the site on tor
You can use a web proxy over TOR if you're worried about that

>that may or may not cause the site to be in trouble
It shouldn't be a trouble, probably!
Teh police/hosts etc don't care about it as much as u think they do. In the worst case, they'd send a mail to take it down in x hours instead of summoning partyvan - this was the case for much worse stuff on other sites in the past.

>heyuri feels alot more pedo-geared then old 4chan ever was
4chan was less Japanese-influenced than Heyuri is. We're yet to reach nijiura levels on lolikon here

>>115904
well, if the emperor says so

>>115877
Feels like an insult to call Heyuri a clone. The point of looking back is to move forward in a new way, to more fun places.

>>115877
>Heyuri is trying to be a 2000s 4chan clone
No it doesn't

>>115875

Shut up.

I just downloaded a media cd and this was the first clip art file on it that I opened, 1999 proto pedobear lul. Made me think of this thread.
This was the CD:
https://archive.org/details/ptmnt-5-1

1999, eh... That was before kumaa-san hit the puberty became pedoboar


　　 ∩＿＿＿∩
　　 | ノ　　　　　 ヽ
　　/　　＞　　　● |
　 |　　　　( _●_)　 ミ　
　彡､　　　 |∪|　　　）　　
/　　　　　 ヽノ　/／ 　　
ヽ|　　　　　　　/ 　
　|　　　　　　 /
　ヽ　／　 ／
　　／　／ヽ
（´＿ ／ヾ_)

WARNING
"heyuri" is a know pedophile website please teach your children to avoid this place Ive already informed europol

aslo asians are hideous

(USER WAS BLIND FOR THIS POST)

>>115904

Can't we all just get along.

>>115941
くまくま━━━━━━ヽ（ ・(ｪ)・ ）ノ━━━━━━ !!!

What I see is really not pornographic at all. Not more pornographic than David Hamilton's photography. I'm pissed they censored all these nipples and pussies for no reason.

after digging through the many photos i found this girl to be my favorte ヽ(´∇`)ノ but theres soo many girls to choose from!! (;´Д`)

Amidst a lot of ugly soulless pictures, there a few that are really beautiful.

loli for the buddha.

ｷﾀ━━━(ﾟ∀ﾟ)━━━!!

from 神話少女栗山千明 btw.

>>115875

I think /l/ brought a lot of pedos over here too.

>>116025
i think teh pedos brought you here!