all
a
/
b
/
c
/
f
/
h
/
j
/
jp
/
l
/
o
/
q
/
s
/
sw
/
lounge
cgi
up
wiki
Heyuri!
Bulletin Boards
2D Cute
2D Ero
2D Lolikon
3D Girls
Anime/Manga
Flash
Girl Talk
日本語/Japan
Lounge
Oekaki
Off-Topic
Site Discussion
Strange World
Overboard
Heyuri★CGI
Heyuri★CGI
@PartyII
Battle Royale R
Chat
Chinsouki★
Dating
DevChat
Drama Club
Hakoniwa Islands PvE
Hakoniwa Islands PvP
Polls
Slime Breeder
Web Banana
Web Shiritori
Yumemiru Gambler
Kakiko Checker
Other
Anime Nominations
Banners
Cytube
Heyuri Calendar
Heyuri Wiki
MAL Club
Museum
Steam Group
Uploader
[
Settings
]
[
Home
] [
Contact
] [
Catalog
] [
Search
] [
Thread list
] [
Stats
] [
Reports
] [
Watcher
] [
PMs
] [
Admin
]
Site Discussion@Heyuri
it's the place to be!
[
Return
] [
Bottom
]
Posting mode: Reply
Name
E-mail
sage
noko
dump
Subject
Post
Comment
Tegaki
Emotes
Kaomoji
ヽ(´ー`)ノ
(;´Д`)
ヽ(´∇`)ノ
(´人`)
(^Д^)
(´ー`)
( ´,_ゝ`)
(´~`)
(;゚Д゚)
(;゚∀゚)
┐(゚~゚)┌
ヽ(`Д´)ノ
( ´ω`)
(゚ー`)
(・∀・)
(⌒∇⌒ゞ)
(゚血゚#)
(゚ー゚)
(´¬`)
(´π`)
ヽ(゚ρ゚)ノ
Σ(;゚Д゚)
Σ(゚д゚|||)
キタ━━━(・∀・)━━━!!
(*゚∀゚)
( ̄ー ̄)
\(^o^)/
(´・ω・`)
(σ・∀・)σ
(*^ー゚)b
(-_-)
(=゚ω゚)ノ
(・A・)
( ´∀`)つ
(@^▽^)/
Emoji
BBCode
B
I
U
S
Spoiler
Quote
Scroll
Code
C
o
l
o
r
Size
ASCII
File
Animated GIF
Password
(for deletion)
Allowed file types are: gif, jpg, jpeg, png, bmp, webp, swf, webm, mp4
Maximum file size allowed is 50000 KB.
Images greater than 200 * 200 pixels will be thumbnailed.
5
unique users in the last 10 minutes (including lurkers)
Switch form position
|
BBCode reference
|
Banned?
|
Quick reply
|
Post API
Read the
rules
before you post.
Protect your username, use a
tripcode!
日本のへゆり
2026-08-14
-
meow
2026-08-13
-
Kaotype, kaomoji at your fingertips
2026-08-10
-
Hot OL x Peanut Butter Cracker
2026-07-31
-
Report feature is added. You can now report posts via their dropdown menu
[
Show all
]
We will have Bunkasai on 19-20 September [
Info
]
Want your banner here? Click here to submit yours!
File:
2091378532773671084_Furry_Golfball_1.png
(299 KB, 373x502)
ImgOps
Hide image
ImgOps
Hide image
▶
Sorry!Please give me information
Anonymous
2026/08/23
(Sun)
20:21:24
ID:9leyteG2
No.
70774
[
Report
]
AS
▶
As far as I remember, the current rule about posting 3D lolis is that you can do it as long as you don't sexualize them (and that they are not in an obviously sexual position themselves). Now I'll admit that I've been warned for posting sexually charged comments about JC's before, but I've also gotten a few deletions for images that I made with completely benign captions and that weren't sexual. Of course, I'd like to upload the image in question along with my comment, but they got deleted and I don't want to break the rules.
I can describe it though: It was a JS age girl sitting on a bed in her pyjamas (nothing revealing) and I said something about "you should play board games with your daughter and teach her strategic skills". It got deleted and I'm really confused and feeling pretty heartbroken. I think that posting cute girls can brighten our days, make us happier, and make life better for all of us.
I would appreciate a clarification on where the line is, and I apologize for accidentally crossing it if so. Also, I posted a picture of a JK's bare breasts that I downloaded from twitter, that image had thousands of likes and was weeks old, so I thought it was legal. I apologize to the mods for causing them trouble.I hope I can understand the rules and not break them again.
Thank you!
>>
1
Anonymous
2026/08/23
(Sun)
20:24:16
ID:Dg/gQzcQ
No.
70775
[
Report
]
▶
even if they are normal threads, if you overpopulate the board with lolis, mods will step in.
>>
2
Anonymous
2026/08/23
(Sun)
20:25:34
ID:9leyteG2
No.
70776
[
Report
]
▶
>>70775
it was in the dedicated lolicon containment thread! (I can't believe we are treated like this in 2026)
>>
3
Anonymous
2026/08/23
(Sun)
20:27:57
ID:Dg/gQzcQ
No.
70777
[
Report
]
▶
>>70776
if it was then i dont know why your stuff was deleted.
(´・ω・` )
maybe the picture made the mods pee pee hard and he got scared
>>
4
Anonymous
2026/08/23
(Sun)
20:34:42
ID: MODERATOR
No.
70778
[
Report
]
▶
You were spamming, attaching sexual comments, and generally being a nuisance, then you moved on to posting bare chests, panchira, etc.
After getting banned, you started ban evading and repeatedly posting/linking to images on
Chat@Heyuri
- it was at this point that you were considered "ban on sight"
>>
5
Anonymous
2026/08/23
(Sun)
20:37:21
ID:9leyteG2
No.
70779
[
Report
]
▶
>>70778
>You were spamming, attaching sexual comments, and generally being a nuisance, then you moved on to posting bare chests, panchira, etc.
I already admitted to all of this. At least the last parts (I re uploaded an image once or twice, hardly spamming). Given the positive reactions, I don't think anyone found it a nuisance. Also, you didn't actually answer the question
>>
6
Anonymous
2026/08/23
(Sun)
20:37:34
ID:Dg/gQzcQ
No.
70780
[
Report
]
▶
for some reason some people cannot adhere to the very simple unspoken rule "dont be annoying about your fetish"
>>
7
Anonymous
2026/08/23
(Sun)
20:39:33
ID:9leyteG2
No.
70781
[
Report
]
▶
Okay, a very good example just happened. A completely innocent post with several adult models in swimsuits just got deleted. Is insinuating a daughter relationship the problem?
>>
8
Anonymous
2026/08/23
(Sun)
20:48:08
ID: MODERATOR
No.
70782
[
Report
]
▶
File:
image.png
(61 KB, 949x1090)
ImgOps
Hide image
ImgOps
Hide image
▶
>hardly spamming
You were flooding the chat with dozens of inane messages in rapid succession over a 2+ hour period
>Given the positive reactions, I don't think anyone found it a nuisance
You got banned - repeatedly - and kept returning just to do the same thing again. You were (and still are) behaving like an incessant pest, which is why you (specifically) are getting treated like one
>A completely innocent post with several adult models in swimsuits
Those were not adults, and we'd be retards to assume that any uploads of yours contained adults
>>
9
Anonymous
2026/08/23
(Sun)
21:04:08
ID:71oJuDxs
No.
70783
[
Report
]
▶
>>70782
> (and still are)
If politely asking for a rule clarification is really that bothersome to you you should reconsider your position as "Guy who volunteers to moderate an imageboard"
>Those were not adults, and we'd be retards to assume that any uploads of yours contained adults
The swimsuit image was, yes.
>>
12
Anonymous
2026/08/23
(Sun)
22:05:34
ID:IGdope2c
No.
70786
[
Report
]
▶
Mod's, let me see everything and I'll make a determination on what should be deleted
>>
13
Anonymous
SAGE!
2026/08/23
(Sun)
22:53:15
ID: Heaven
No.
70787
[
Report
]
▶
sad day for the heyuri pedophiles
>>
14
Anonymous
2026/08/25
(Tue)
02:00:14
ID:aBf44zoY
No.
70789
[
Report
]
▶
Heyuri is not a site to express your love for [real] lolis in a straightforward way like that, contrary to its reputation outside the site, it's not your 8chan in 2015. Heyuri chooses LOLs over [3D] LOLis. Despite what was being said in
>>62119
, they're only formally allowed [for now], for them being a phenomena of the great 0ld [Japanese] interwebs. The sad truth is little girls really are very serious weapon to destroy any site and make provocative actions. It's madness but no one can do something about this.
>>
16
Anonymous
SAGE!
2026/08/25
(Tue)
17:30:09
ID: Heaven
No.
70792
[
Report
]
▶
HOW CAN YOU PREFER LOWERCASE LETTERS TO MUCH OLDER AND DEVELOPED CAPITALS? THIS IS DISGUSTING. I REALLY HOPE YOU'RE NOT TOUCHING THEM IRL WITH YOUR PEN
>>
17
Anonymous
2026/08/30
(Sun)
13:11:26
ID:Kq.TpekQ
No.
70848
[
Report
]
▶
There's absolutely nothing illegal about posting SFW pictures/videos of little girls, the mod team is full of shit. But when you call that excuse out, they say "w-well, it's annoying the userbase!", which is blatantly untrue.
The mods are the only ones annoyed by loli. Kaguya needs to put a fucking muzzle on them already before this site dies. They treat this site (especially /b/) like its their own personal hangout zone, policing anyone who stands in the way of the bullshit threads they make, posing as anons. People respect Kagu because he's always been willing to protect loli freedom, which is something that no other clearnet IB owners do. But his mod team is pure cancer, and they will certainly cause the death of Heyuri.
>>
18
Anonymous
2026/08/30
(Sun)
14:45:02
ID:oDF/jxJs
No.
70849
[
Report
]
▶
>>70848
mods are always faggots and cancer but ericka thread was succesful
>>
19
Anonymous
SAGE!
2026/08/30
(Sun)
14:48:06
ID: Heaven
No.
70850
[
Report
]
▶
>>70849
no it was not. poneylover1989 was successful, it just happened to be in your shit thread.
>>
20
Anonymous
2026/08/30
(Sun)
14:50:54
ID:oDF/jxJs
No.
70851
[
Report
]
▶
>>70850
wipe off the tears and keep your chin up!
>>
21
Anonymous
2026/08/30
(Sun)
15:10:44
ID: ADMIN
No.
70853
[
Report
]
▶
>But when you call that excuse out, they say "w-well, it's annoying the userbase!"
The main reason for banning kid picz in certain cases has nothing to do with pleasing the userbase
quoting from
>>67926
(topic was about eroi kids on 3D Girls board, but broadly applies for Heyuri policies)
First of all, it's crucial to not mix the discussions of "what is the extend of stuff we can host without getting Heyuri in trouble" and "what type of board we want 3D Girls to be". While first one is a objective discussion trying to keep Heyuri alive, the latter should not pay regard to any legal limits - which would later be applied on top of the "rules" we reach here.
As I said in my first sentence, my only limits are legal ones. In a theoretical utopia where there are no laws limiting what we are allowed to fap to, I believe threads for both rori and adult fetishists could coexist in peace, so could mixed ones if that's something the thread topic allows. The discussion of "we are not a pedo site!" vs "true heyurizens are pedos!" is hereby highly lame and is a result of overthinking about what u get b0nerz from
Heyuri did get in trouble since for 2D rori, I could only get us out of trouble thx to certain court rulings deeming it protected speech but that wouldn't be the case for IRL kids, at least with the current laws, which sadly I don't make
An anti-staff sentiment would be more dangerous for Heyuri. A Heyurizen should be laid-back, as they can get banned/warned by mods for violating rules, and otherwise not willing to simply accept the rulings and move on to posting, if they had personal feuds with staff members.
I don't know what you mean by "bullshit threads". I probably like "bullshit threads" you are thinking of too. You aren't on the most serious place on the internet right nao
Want your banner here? Click here to submit yours!
[
Top
]
Delete post: [
File only
]
Password:
First
[1]
Last
Style: