[Return] [Bottom]

Posting mode: Reply

Emotes
Kaomoji
Emoji
BBCode
(for deletion)
  • Allowed file types are: gif, jpg, jpeg, png, bmp, webp, swf, webm, mp4
  • Maximum file size allowed is 50000 KB.
  • Images greater than 200 * 200 pixels will be thumbnailed.
  • 5 unique users in the last 10 minutes (including lurkers)




We will have Bunkasai on 19-20 September [Info]

Want your banner here? Click here to submit yours!

I think the loli outside of /l/ rule is being applied too strictly now. It's to the point that almost any mentions of lolis in a thread or in a reply get deleted.
>>
Things I've seen get deleted recently:

A reply in a thread about licking girls that mentioned licking a lolis chest: deleted

Another unrelated reply about licking a lolis feet: deleted

A guy who said he would get a boner if he saw JC pantsu: deleted

A guy posting 2D loli ero and stating that he wanted to have sex with her: deleted
>>
I want to note that I saw some other user, skunk-san, discussing this @ CGI, that wasn't me. Please come and lend your support to me in this thread, if you are reading this...
>>
During the last townhall, pasting from HHS, we decided on

- 2D loli pr0n threads that only serve to share erotic loli-focused images will be moved to /l/ (at staff-san's discretion)
- Common derailment topics (2D loli pr0n, pee/scat, etc.) will be clamped down on a little harder in certain cases (at staff-san's discretion)

First one is easy to enforce and I believe not too disruptive to user since it's only a case of a thread being moved to another board.
Second was agreed on a time where there was a lot of board domination on loli. It wasn't meant to keep Off-Topic entirely loli/lolikon-free. It's the natural tendency of a lolicon to occasionally mention his fantasies, and -as with any other fetish- has the right to exist on off-topic.
I (a rorikon) also think any board looks bettar with a sprinkle of lolicon, a stance I didn't change since since posting >>61120

I still support the community decision made during the townhall, and don't have anything to propose other than being a bit softer on rorikon.

Replying a point a mod made on CGI about it being forced by a handful of users - it also doesn't matter even if it's a single user, the rule is against board domination, not clamping down on content (lolicon or not) posted by a single user if he isn't posting frequently enough that it seems excessive. We once had a single person posting about planes too in that regard, yet noone suggested banning him because he is the only one interested in planes.
because we also once had more rorikon users, who might have left due to crackdowns...
>>
>>70731
>I still support the community decision made during the townhall, and don't have anything to propose other than being a bit softer on rorikon.

Restore those posts then. The anti-loli crusade is going too far
>>
292148
I gathered some recent rori deletions to go by example, I'll post a few so feel free to give your opinions if a post was fine or not

>A reply in a thread about licking girls that mentioned licking a lolis chest: deleted
Yeah, I don't think mention of a loli chest lickage after mentions of licking butth0les or stuffing JK socks in mouth was excessive... This is ignoring the fact that poster knowingly b0rk Rule 8 (we already discussed that "smash that yeah button" is rule 8 in the past), so deletion itself was justified.
>>
112164
I'm just posting some examples nao, even if some of them are doomed with each staff having their own discretion. "Anti-loli" may be a bit accusatory when they are cool about lolicon, but where to draw the line exactly is harder to decide on.
>>
226612
キタ━━━(゚∀゚)━━━!!
>>
We agreed on sharing actual guides on seducing children may be off-limits in the past, but this post was only joking about it so posting anyways
>>
>>>/b/191145
:sad: I hope it stays up...
>>
45590
I noticed this deletion after the fact, but deleting the mere suggestion of not being attracted to +18 ADULT WOMEN was excessive imo.

This is the most that was deleted past 2 weeks (then deleted posts get purged 4 good), some lame CP jokes were deleted too but those were more understandable.
>>
also I remembrar'd I could just hide IPs in screencaps after censoring IPs
>>
>>
I move 2D loli threads from Off-Topic to 2D Lolikon if I think they would be a perfect fit there - e.g. a thread simply sharing 2D loli pics, discussion solely related to 2D loli topics (e.g. "who's your favorite loli artist?", "post loli figures"), etc. I've done the same for other "we have a board for that" topics, but such cases are very rare

If it's a non-loli-specific thread like "ITT post pics that give u teh b0ner" or "here's a bunch of stuff I imported from Japan", and 2D loli gets posted along the way, it's not going to get moved or deleted (unless they included a comment referencing IRL kiddies, which is sometimes the case)

>if he isn't posting frequently enough that it seems excessive
It is excessive - it only doesn't seem as excessive now because we're 1.5 years into making efforts to delete anything related to sexualizing 3D/IRL kiddies, and moving straight-up 2D rori threads to the 2D rori board

There's been points in Heyuri history when it was difficult to make any thread at all and have it not derail into loli/pedo territory - not because the majority of users want it that way, but because of a small minority who won't allow threads about anything else to go un-loli'd

>>70738
You're missing that he was giving a genuine guide/recommendation on how to prey on real children online - the emphasized "18+ ADULT WOMEN" part was just a "they can't ban me if I replace 'little girls' with this" attempt
>>
>>70741
>but because of a small minority who won't allow threads about anything else to go un-loli'd

A clique of non-users from CGI Chat don't repesent the majority of people actually making and fapping to threads on Heyuri. If you only consider the latter, then a liberal stance is supported.

Mentioning lolis in a thread related to sexual topics in general is one of the basic rights enshrined in the Heyuri Constitution!
>>
>>70728
theres more to the world of posting than rori and fapping my dude
>>
>A clique of non-users from CGI Chat don't repesent the majority of people actually making and fapping to threads on Heyuri.
Such a clique doesn't exist, and Chat@Heyuri is irrelevant to everything I said in the previous post. For what it's worth, Chat@Heyuri regulars are all main site users - including frequent thread makers, fappers, and die-hard lolicons

Heyuri prior to 2023-2024 didn't have the "every thread derails into loli/pedo" issue - the phenomenon arrived after the big New Year 2023 influx, which brought in a couple of MAPfags and loli spammers. Off-Topic@Heyuri is at its best when there's variety and unpredictable...ness

>Mentioning lolis in a thread related to sexual topics in general is one of the basic rights enshrined in the Heyuri Constitution!
Yeah, and it's allowed unless ur clearly referring to 3D/IRL loli or are breaking some other rule. Whether we should simply delete such posts or edit out the rule-breaking parts is something yet to be discussed - I'm personally not a fan of post editing
>>
i find it odd that an influx of people have come in in a short period and made this an issue again when it hasn't been one in months... i mean, a new user comes into chat yesterday (who has somehow already been mentioned in this thread) and INSTANTLY started asking where they can find chio penguin... insisting sites be named, arguing with mods, derailing conversation, not wanting to talk about anything else. call me a schizo but it strikes me as odd and maybe even entrapment...
Rules on lolicon have, 1, already been decided by townhall and 2, mod discretion is baked into site rules... lolicon has its whole own board and also threads on /b/ (ive even made them) frequently, its not like mods are trying to purge the site of lolicons or something. I think its best the way things are now where heyuri is a site with lolicons and not a lolicons site.
>>
You know how in America it's tabboo for military officials to voice opinions on political issues? Well, it's probably the same with ex-admins commenting about it too... (´人`)
>>
If two people want to talk about loli in a thread that'll be forgotten tomorrow, why stop them? If the thread gets overtaken with loli, that just means the topic probably wasn't any good to begin with. You're acting like posts about enjoying loli are nothing but worthless spam meant to degrade the quality of the boards, and not the results of the identity which has been cultivated on this website for years.
Don't forget your roots, HY. :glare2:
>>
>>70744
>variety and unpredictable...ness
This is code for hagspam and blogposts
>>
i encourage you to use /l/ for discussions too, It shouldnt have a reputation for just an image bump. instead of derailing threads on /b/ to talk about your fantasies, feel free to talk about them on /l/ since it can be for discussion too :happy:
>>
>>70749
Why would I use the image dumping ground when I can talk to my loli loving friends on /b/? :dizzy:
>>
Let's not kid ourselves, no one uses /l/ except a few japanese guys posting AI pictures. All of the other threads were just moved from /b/ and then immediately died
>>
>If two people want to talk about loli in a thread that'll be forgotten tomorrow, why stop them?
Talking about 2D loli in Off-Topic threads was never stopped; only the sexualization of 3D loli, for legal reasons. Talking about loli in threads where it's not relevant at all - and repeatedly doing so for weeks, months, years - has been clamped down on at staff-san's discretion. It is teh boring and lame when non-loli threads predictably result in loliposting (or pee/p00p posting, which had also become recurring themes prior to the last townhall)

>and not the results of the identity which has been cultivated on this website for years.
>Don't forget your roots, HY.
Heyuri's roots are being an anime/otaku-oriented Futaba clone with an emphasis on old internet culture - Heyuri was not intended to be a loli website, nor was loli ever Heyuri's "identity". The 2D Lolikon board is the exception, which is 100% centered around loli

>Why would I use the image dumping ground
:closed-eyes:
>>
>the image dumping ground
it doesnt have to be that, and you see /l/ threads in the overboard, so its not like they get ignored.
Your thread gets "ignored" because its just a low pph website or thread is not as interesting as you thought
>>
>>70751
Seems like some of these mods *cough* waha *burp* want to throw us loli lovers into the segregation camps. The question is, what dirt do they have on Kagu? Why do they want to destroy the site?
>>
>>70752
>It is teh boring and lame
I have that sentiment towards most /b/ threads "hey guys Im going on a date 2nait what should i do? hey are you on the tism spectrum, how do you have le secks when tism lolol LOL LUKE AT THESE AI TITS" but those never get purged
>>
>>70754
There is definitely a vast conspiracy underfoot. Heyuri is going to be going public with an ambitious IPO and the admins are trying to clean up our image for investors.

Loli is just the beginning...
>>
i ruined it for everybody guys

Want your banner here? Click here to submit yours!

[Top]

Delete post: []
First
[1]
Last