all a / b / c / f / h / j / jp / l / o / q / s / sw / lounge cgi up wiki
[Home] [Catalog] [Search] [Inbox] [Write PM] [Admin]
[Return]

Posting mode: Reply
(for deletion)
  • Allowed file types are: gif, jpg, jpeg, png, bmp, swf, webm, mp4
  • Maximum file size allowed is 50000 KB.
  • Images greater than 200 * 200 pixels will be thumbnailed.
We will have a Halloween stream at 19:00 UTC this Friday!
Bunkasai 2025 reminder - happening THIS SUNDAY (Nov. 02nd)!
Check the details at: [Thread]
File: image.png
(119 KB, 894x534)[ImgOps]
119 KB
No.69542
This thread was autosaged for no reason, it violated absolutely no rules, but because an argument spawned in the replies it was deleted.

On top of that, the entire "argument" (mostly people joking with eachother) was deleted as well. This is a repeated pattern since anything resembling a heated discussion is quickly autosaged or deleted. No discussion is allowed to happen unless there is consensus
>>
No.69543
it was basically "lmao Sweden=niggers" shit instead of actual discussion and definitely hits rule 8d

people have discussions here all the time too, but if it starts looking like 4chan-tier shit flinging, then it gets axed (also rule 8d)
>>
No.69544
That thread was not deleted. There were multiple complaints about the replies in that thread (and the general state of Off-Topic lately) on Chat@Heyuri, so I decided to baleet the kusoposts since I wasn't particularly fond of the thread either (though I was happy to just leave it autosage'd and forget about it). I un-autosage'd it after baleeting the replies in question

Ur free to discuss things on Heyuri, but u should go to 4chan to complain/troll about nigras in Sweden or whatever
>>
No.69545
Threads can be autosaged when they seem to have fulfilled their purpose with noone replying to OP, but they serve to users bantering at each other instead

The first deleted post in that thread is a bit /pol/-ish but not really R7, and the second one (reply to it) was really posted just to get a rise out of the users unless it was ironic? I thought that at first, but seems waffle and chikin is something people actually eat together, WTF? and that's basically Rule 8.d
Either way it succeeded and attracted a user who has been previous ban records for Rule 7, there on wasn't really fitting to Heyuri.

Thanks for caring enough to create a thread anyways!

>>69544
I don't feel like making political posts about current political stuff is really R7. With one unrelated exception, it's irrelevant if same topics are happening to be discussed on 4chan as well.
That said I can also understand we don't live in an utopia where we can comfortably just allow all political discussions, those who think Heyuri is the perfect place to boldly state their controversial views hardly mind R8.d after exchanging a few posts in practice. It was brought up last townhall if we should enforce R7 stricter and the response was mixed too.
>>
No.69546
They even deleted my spurdo sparde post -_-
>>69544
Why do you think you can AS a post just because you dont personally like it? Cunt
>>
No.69547
>I don't feel like making political posts about current political stuff is really R7. With one unrelated exception, it's irrelevant if same topics are happening to be discussed on 4chan as well.
There's a difference between rationally discussing & debating politics, wars, social issues, etc. VS "I hate XYZ people and I think they should GTFO and/or kill themselves". There's been a lot of the latter lately, and shit sux

I think it's still up for debate whether or not "Serious Business" political discussions belong on Heyuri or not, but I'd like to believe we could host discussions on any topic (including that which we previously B& entirely)... certain users love to prove me wrong on that front however :sweat2:

>Why do you think you can AS a post just because you dont personally like it? Cunt
:xd:
Delete post: []