all a / b / c / f / h / jp / l / o / q / s / sw / lounge cgi up wiki
[Home] [Catalog] [Search] [Inbox] [Write PM] [Admin]
[Return]

Posting mode: Reply
(for deletion, 8 chars max)
  • Allowed file types are: gif, jpg, jpeg, png, bmp, swf, webm, mp4
  • Maximum file size allowed is 50000 KB.
  • Images greater than 200 * 200 pixels will be thumbnailed.
File: ssss.png
(43 KB, 214x219)[ImgOps]
43 KB
No.68305
How on earth did a post like this manage to survive a week on this website? Doesn't this fall under rule 8? (´￢`)
>>
No.68306
How does it fall under rule 8? huh

On face value it reads like a spam post if anything, though the inclusion of "VAIDS" (lol) makes me doubt that it wasn't written in jest. xd

Then again, the post IP doesn't have any other posts coming from it, so who knows. If memory serves, there's been spam that resembles it before. But it got replies with users having fun with it, so I didn't, and still don't, see a point in deleting it.

I'm replying earnestly for once because you didn't write like the typical "RULE 8 WORD DETECTED, <insert link to KYM page>, MODS ARREST THIS MAN" report post on here - it seems you're new?
>>
No.68307
I typically file /pol/ spam like that under rules 3 and 7, but I didn't see that thread until it already replies

It didn't seem like it caused a retarded flame war or Serious Business, so watevarz. It's in autosage now anyway
>>
No.68308
File: 1570070614587.png
(118 KB, 400x417)[ImgOps]
118 KB
>>68306
Thanks for replying ヽ(´∇`)ノ
I'm not really sure it was rule 8 or if it was more rule 7, but it felt like one ot hose nu-4chan /pol/ posts about muh vax or other poltically charged ragebait topics
It just rubbed me the wrong way.In the end, it's probably just spam.
>it seems you're new?
I wouldn't really say I'm new here I just don't visit that much and when I do I lurk.
>>
No.68309
>>68308
*Although I have been visiting a lot more recently since I'm starting to get sick of 4chan
>>
No.68312
Nobody on heyuri is retarded enough to fall for that kind of ragebait so it just became a fun thread about the hypothetical scenario of billions dying in 2025, I'm glad it wasn't deleted. More spam threads should just have their links/product names redacted and be allowed to stay up and be made fun of!
>>
No.68313
honestly, I am proud of the replies for the reasons >>68307 said
no gay srs bsns /pol/ bullshit because we kick ass here
cool

I want to agree with >>68312 regarding leaving things up for the lulz with links stripped, although something in my brain is telling me it might be a bad idea. Nothing specific though, and I really think it would be lulzy as fuck.
biggrin
Delete post: []