lolis are culture, agree`d

クソ OP post but why was that thread autosage'd?

This is not the right words you'd use when talking to someone in power, but I agree with the point.

Anyone who has lurked heyuri for more than a day knows 90% of the users, mods, and admins are pedos so that obviously isn't why it was autosaged. Maybe it was because of the whiny annoying "I'm so jealous of him i wish that were me " /r9k/ attitude of the OP?

>>68127
Faganon's pedo threads have been a point of controversy within the staff. They are remarkably different from other lolikon threads, so moderation against them can be a little stricter
Apparently it was seen fitting to have that thread age-able for 3 days instead of default of 7, so it was AS'd.
Or maybe the post he made (I can't see it since it's deleted now, but it was right before that post was deleted and thread was AS'd) caused the AS.
Don't think too deeply about it please

>>68129
Rather than that, it's not the right attitude to have while posting on Heyuri. Staff shouldn't otherwise be treated differently here

>>68130

It wasn't meant to be an /r9k/ whiny annoying style post the tone is more like oh yeah, he is such a lucky kid i am so jealous bro.

>>68131
>Faganon's pedo threads have been a point of controversy within the staff. They are remarkably different from other lolikon threads, so moderation against them can be a little stricter


You do realize i am not the only anon on this site that makes pedo/loli threads, right?

Plus, i do make non-pedo threads too are the staff gonna auto sage those too?

Stop treating me as this boogeyman of Heyuri who shits up the board with CP and pro-pedo activism post i had/have nothing to do with that.

dont old threads just get autosaged on page 2 or 3? if you look at older threads, theyre also saged... doesnt seem like discrimination to me. ┐(ﾟ～ﾟ)┌

>You do realize i am not the only anon on this site that makes pedo/loli threads, right?
Yeah, me and the mod who AS'd the thread exists after all

>Plus, i do make non-pedo threads too are the staff gonna auto sage those too?
No, the topic is only your rorikon threads.
While on it, if I'm allowed to nitpick now, while also unrelated to this thread, I would liek to point out you're the only one making threads in the unusual(here) way of referring Off-Topic as "/b/"

>Stop treating me as this boogeyman of Heyuri who shits up the board
Weren't u okay with it at >>68083 ?

>>68135
>Yeah, me and the mod who AS'd the thread exists after all

I know you are joking here but that wasn't my point the point is there are other people on here who post the same type of content as me.

For example, awhile back there was a Shirley temple thread posted here which i did not make but did post in.

>While on it, if I'm allowed to nitpick now, while also unrelated to this thread, I would liek to point out you're the only one making threads in the unusual(here) way of referring Off-Topic as "/b/"

Because Off Topic is /b/ and not entirety true i have seen other anons do it too.

>Weren't u okay with it

I don't care if people don't like me nor my post but if you blame me for shit i didn't do then i care.

>>68125
>90% of the users, mods, and admins are pedos
well that just fucking ruined the site for me.

The percentage isn't that high - it's just that a couple of 3D loli lovers on here are very "loud 'n' proud" and won't STFU about it because they're MAPfags who are very obviously trying to persuade others to accept them and become pedophiles themselves