all a / b / c / f / h / jp / l / o / q / s / sw / lounge cgi up wiki
[Home] [Catalog] [Search] [Inbox] [Write PM] [Admin]
[Return]

Posting mode: Reply
(for deletion, 8 chars max)
  • Allowed file types are: gif, jpg, jpeg, png, bmp, swf, webm, mp4
  • Maximum file size allowed is 50000 KB.
  • Images greater than 200 * 200 pixels will be thumbnailed.
We will watch Midori no Hibi next Saturday 18:00 UTC [Info] [Countdown]
File: x4469c.webm
(1883 KB, 720x480)
1883 KB
No.67952
we need a retro, y2k, 2000s board
Marked for deletion (Old)
>>
No.67953
Off-Topic, Lounge, and Strange World are all good places for that topic smile
>>
No.67954
>y2k
dark Nobody called those "aesthetics" that name back then. The whole "y2k" thing is so vague and it groups things that were never seen as being related back at the time, it doesn't even make sense. It's faux nostalgia. Fauxstalgia
>>
No.67957
File: arle-laugh-sweat.jpg
(81 KB, 520x700)[ImgOps]
81 KB
>>67954
>The whole "y2k" thing is so vague and it groups things that were never seen as being related back at the time
this shit is basically every decade lol, that's just how shit goes

pointy nipples
>>
No.67958
At the time, "Y2K" was just "modern", "contemporary", "futuristic", etc. - but since those definitions change over time, it's useful to give older forms distinct names to differentiate them

Nobody my age (30s) can complain about younger people being fascinated with (or delusional/inaccurate about) 90s-00s media, technology, fashions, aesthetics, etc., since we did the same shit to the 60s-80s biggrin
>>
No.67961
this is the worst idea I've ever seen on /q/
>>
No.68167
>>67958
Good autistic
>>
No.68168
>>67958
you should be mad because a lot of people are redefining and co opting culture for their own profit and for political motivations.
Just liking a style or old-thing is not the same as what is going on now specifically with 2000-2010 cultures.
>>
No.68170
isn't that just this whole site kind of. i noticed the rules try to make it that way. like no modern meme stuff last i checked etc. but i'm kind of confused about the emoji's and stuff. i feel like all that should be restricted to one board, maybe /b/ is suited for it? the quality of this site will never pick up if it's only frequented by tiktokers or those types that are obsessed with pretending to be nerdy or i guess "otaku" and whatever.
>>
No.68171
>you should be mad
No I shouldn't biggrin

>i noticed the rules try to make it that way. like no modern meme stuff last i checked etc.
Teh rules are to keep out party p00pers and compulsive whiners, that is all smile
>>
No.68172
>like no modern meme stuff last i checked etc
I don't think there is now, unless you think emoji from 2004 are "modern memes"

>but i'm kind of confused about the emoji's and stuff
>i feel like all that
If you are trying to make a point, using phrasings like "and stuff" or "all that" doesn't help...
Delete post: []