Rule 0It's pretty obviously cosmo, even if she's using a different IPhttps://img.heyuri.net/b/koko.php?res=98376#p98495
B&Although cosmo claims it's not her, since we can't verify anything on internets, acting like a ban evader (or giving me enough reason to think ur underage) is enough for ban
>is enough for banshouldn't be
Why wouldn't it be obvious? She's replying directly to the person who dissed her.
>>66480I meant that, if acting like a teenagers is enough for a ban, then that would mean 50% of our user base would have to be wiped out
