And for our first report: greentexting in the Ran thread

Oh, it seems mod-sama already took care of this. Thanks!

>>62858
That post was deleted within a minute
It was from the fag spamming MMD himself too

It was already dealt with... and it was posted by a previously "b& 4 Rule 9" IP that was the MMD/pedo spammer's

Another report: buzzword in the thread No.40369

dox thread on b - breaks kolymas tos

Greentexting in the Fukuicchi thread

ifunny caption gif in the pipebomb thread

>>62904
It's not exactly in the rules, but Mod-sama said in the post No.62818, that he doesn't want these gifs on Heyuri.

>>62906
Greentexting and wojackposting in the report thread

>>62909
I've had my fun toady

Mr. Shitposter is asking for a ban again

snitches...

...get bitches

>>62939
you are undesired here

Buzzword in the cigarette thread (No.41408)

>>62943
Is normalfag really a “buzzword” (you are not using that term correctly btw)
I could understand if it said “normie” though

>>62947
I think he was referring more to "chads", but yes "normalfag" is a 4chan buzzword - albeit a slightly older one

If you ever want a place to feel like a miserable post-summer 2007 4chan board, where everyone's bitching and competing in every thread over how other people are "not REAL nerds/outcasts/[website] users like ME", just call anyone and everyone a "normalfag" or a "newfag" non-stop

"Normie" is also a significantly older term by a matter of decades, albeit just as st00pid

>>62947
>>62948
I was referring to "chads". I personally think "normalfags" is okay to use here

>>62948
Although I think you're actually right. Pic rel is an old post from /jp/ that also talks about the term "newfag" being from 2006/2007 and how it quickly got annoying.

>>62950
"it was probably on b for ages prior"

>>62953
"but I never visited there at that point"

It didn't take off on /b/ until 2007 - prior to that everyone used noob/n00b/newbie just like the rest of the internet had done for years

Normal spam No.42202

>>62955
thanks for report
but it's hawt enough so i'll allow this time

looks like we're getting some soyjak spam in /b/

Threads No.42222, No.42216, No.42221, and post No.42220 in the Batman thread (No.42200) are all spam from soyjack.party

Greentexter No.42252

Buzzwords in the kuz thread

https://dis.heyuri.net/lounge/koko.php?res=3974
https://dis.heyuri.net/lounge/koko.php?res=3975
Spam in lounge

Greentexting in the neko thread (No.42561)

>>63007
That's not the greentexting that's banned. It is a quote from something outside Heyuri
It's only really banned when you don't ctrl+c ctrl+v something after putting writing ">" and write something for the first time.

>>63007
are you dumb or what?

>>63007
Greentext STORIES are banned... Not greentext altogether

perhaps it's more accurate to say using quoting feature to do "greentexting" is banned.

https://dis.heyuri.net/lounge/koko.php?res=3982
spam in lounge

https://dis.heyuri.net/lounge/koko.php?res=4029
spam

https://img.heyuri.net/b/koko.php?res=43075
rule 8 violation

http://img.heyuri.net/b/koko.php?res=43940&pagenum=all#p43944
R8

Rule 8 violation

https://img.heyuri.net/b/koko.php?res=43973&pagenum=all#p44049
https://img.heyuri.net/b/koko.php?res=43973&pagenum=all#p44051

I want a public banning of this faggot
https://img.heyuri.net/b/koko.php?res=43973&pagenum=all#p44106
https://img.heyuri.net/b/koko.php?res=43973&pagenum=all#p44123

do they really break rule 8 or are they just shit?

>>63146
Not him, but they potentially break Rule 8 d., if we presume that that shitposter knows what kind of site Heyuri is, then posting shitty reddit memes could be seen as him trying to annoy/bait people

>>63148
You are right, he wasn't doing it on purpose to enrage other users but that kind of stuff don't really belong to Heyuri

Personally I don't recommend promoting "post X memes/funny images itt" threads anyways, if you want to share a pic you can just open a thread or use them in other creative ways

Rule 8 violation

https://img.heyuri.net/b/koko.php?res=44090&pagenum=all#p44165

>>63149
I agree that picdumps threads on bad. I would advise mods to AS the thread

Western 2hu fandom AIDS aside, here's nuthin wrong with dumping pics if it's a specific topic and it's good/rare material that other users are likely to want to see and/or fukken save (I've made loadz on Heyuri over the years), but I think it's bad interwebs hygiene to maek non-specific general threads like "post funny pictures"

>here's
*there's

>>63149
>>63151
>>63153
I didn't know Heyuri had this consensus against "dump" requests when I made my Touhou thread. Sorry!
I could delete the thread IG if I had the default password. Alternatively mods could just autosage like >>63151 suggested.

I think in general dumping in ones own thread to make it active isnt such a bad thing either? We are not to many active user, and making it seems more active makes more people also join the fun.

i too am in favor of dump threads. leave your hot steamy pile of cool pics there, ill enjoy looking through them without a second thought.

>I think in general dumping in ones own thread to make it active isnt such a bad thing either?
Of course not - providing images is the whole purpose of an imageboard!

The things that are generally frowned upon (on imageboards historically, and not just Heyuri) are:
- dumping things that go against the topic/spirit of the board
- making self-serving demands/requests telling other users to provide you with material (especially without offering anything desirable in return)
- creating threads with overly broad topics (i.e. "funny pics" thread on a board that is largely about posting funny pics)

>>63172
We usually don't care about that bot as it actually delivers, but it has been doing too often lately so 404'd

https://img.heyuri.net/b/koko.php?res=44592&pagenum=all#p44678

-tard suffix might be breaking rule 8

>>63187
lol no way anonytard

>>63187
-tard is teh old. Fucktard, /b/tard, narutard, etc.

Above already has said what I was.

>>63187
According to the archive, "conspiratard" has been used on 4chan since at least 2007

Software was having a seizure and tripleposted my poll. Can mods delete all but one of them? The name is "Which would you prefer?"

>>63198
thanks mods

Red Evils Secret Group
https://ayashii.net/bbs.php?m=t&s=7491&c=58

https://img.heyuri.net/b/koko.php?res=45377
https://img.heyuri.net/b/koko.php?res=45378
https://img.heyuri.net/b/koko.php?res=45378
https://img.heyuri.net/b/koko.php?res=45376

Thank you kuz for your le based and funny spammers

This one is weird
https://ayashii.net/bbs.php?m=f&s=7501&c=58

>>63243
It's just the usual automated spam - we get several of those every day, primarily on Strange World and Lounge

https://img.heyuri.net/b/koko.php?res=45482&q=45492
not gonna check the links to be sure, but looks like spam

>>63244
Its just weird because it has English but also some random Russian words

https://dis.heyuri.net/lounge/koko.php?res=4293

soyjak posting
http://img.heyuri.net/b/koko.php?res=45748&pagenum=all#p45753

>>63267
nothing wrong with that thread

the post he linked was violating R8.c

soyshit
>>45954

>>63272
Baleeted, but u can't link to /b/ using regular quotelinks

http://2ch.sh/src/2734.exe is likely a virus

bot spam
https://ayashii.net/bbs.php?m=tree&s=7550&c=58

https://img.heyuri.net/b/koko.php?res=46436&pagenum=all#p46658

Greentexting

Why wasn't this post deleted?

https://img.heyuri.net/b/koko.php?res=46598&pagenum=all#p46669

Let me guess "it adds something to discussion". Come fucking on, mods. What's the point of having the rules if you don't enforce them?

>Why wasn't this post deleted?
It's being broken way too often lately, so I think a public ban to remind everyone about R8 is justified.

>>63325
In accordance with that, are you going to start banning based on rule 1 of /lounge/?

>>63331
Only global rules are enforced on /lounge/.

I should probably change that "rule"... It's just a misleading explanation. /q/ isn't a ground for any serious discussion (only for site meta), /b/ isn't dedicated to (or even meant for) low quality threads, joke threads are welcome on /lounge/... /b/'s automatic sage isn't even 3 days for a fairly long time.

https://img.heyuri.net/b/koko.php?res=46959#p47010

Scam

https://img.heyuri.net/b/koko.php?res=47285#47414
someone's had a bad day

>>63354
Nice try, but I didn't broke any rules. Unlike you, who keep baiting people and making AI generated posts

>>63354
And you hide behind the VPN/Tor. Coward

Grumpyn00b-san, "Heaven" = used sage, not VPN/Tor

https://img.heyuri.net/b/koko.php?res=47809

This thread's OP's image is a wojack inspired cosplay

https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/shroomjak-mushroom-wojak

>>63364
i hope that is a woman, i jerked off to it already

Uses the word "filter", not sure if that breaks rule 8 or not
https://img.heyuri.net/b/koko.php?res=47871&pagenum=all#p47904

>>63367
It's a new-ish 4chan term, but I dunno if it's annoying enough for Rule 8. We used to just say "I dropped X"

R8
http://img.heyuri.net/b/koko.php?res=47909

It's a new word, but I don't think it's breaking R8. I may be wrong here, but it feels like it has a different nuance than dropping.
"I got filtered" = It was too much for me to handle
"I dropped it" = I didn't liek it so ceased watching

stop with the nitpicking and trying to think up some other form of control over us heyurizens

>>63380
It's a little funny/depressing to see certain n00bs frequently acting like stereotypical overly-serious and gatekeepy post-2007 imageboard users - nitpicking at minor things, poo-pooing fun things, raging at "normalfags", taking posts and teh rules more seriously than even the site staff ever have, telling other users to "kys", calling other users and things "cancer", telling them to not bring "outsider" memes and culture to Heyuri... isn't that exactly what they're doing by being miserable butth0les all the time?

That's not "Heyuri culture" at all... in fact that's exactly what we set out not to be, and why faganon once stood out liek a sore thumb in contrast with Heyuri's lighthearted and happy-go-lucky nature

>>63381
>taking posts and teh rules more seriously than even the site staff ever have
That only makes the mods look bad

>>63382
On the contrary, those who treat the internet as Serious Business look bad

https://img.heyuri.net/b/koko.php?res=48465#48468

Rule 8

>>63389
On that topic, it amazes me how few people these days seem to be aware that "cringe" is a verb, and that the adjective form is "cringeworthy"

"Cringe" as an adjective and the made-up word "cringy" are just dumb social media slang from the past 5 years or so, so plz be aware of how severely retarded and underageb& you sound when using them like that, particularly IRL

>>63390
Sometimes I use 'cringe-making'.

>>63390
Sometimes I use 'cringe-making'.

>>63390
Sometimes I use 'cringe-making'.

There's a 12 year old faggot on /b/, and he's kinda annoying. He uses this name and tripcode -> d9eoead!1e.e4uugZU

Honestly I have some sympathy for him. He reminds of my middleschool years.

>>63427
I really encourage everyone to just teach him and not be too harsh. He has the spirit, but there's just some things that most people take some time to get used to (mainly not RAGING over CP) and he should stop posting his trollface crap

https://img.heyuri.net/b/koko.php?res=48982#p49100

Greentexting

https://img.heyuri.net/b/koko.php?res=49176

Greentexting

>>63435
Seriously, why don't they just ban him already?

>>63436
Cuz kaguya has picked a bad time to be AFK for an extended period, and I needed to sleep at some point

No need for mods, Chen will remove all the bad threads!!!

(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)
(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)
(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)
(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)
(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)
(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)
(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)
(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)
(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)
(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)
(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)
(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)
(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)
(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)
(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)
(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)
(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)
(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)
(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)
(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)
(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)
(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)
(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)
(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)
(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)
(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)
(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)
(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)
(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)
(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)
(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)

test

https://img.heyuri.net/b/koko.php?res=48982#p49100

Greentext

https://img.heyuri.net/b/koko.php?res=49427&q=49456
Types like a 4faggot

>>63450
which post are you talking about?

>>63458
He linked to reply No.49456, which has since been deleted (not by me, I nevar saw it)

If a reply is deleted, the link to that reply will just go to the top of the thread it was in

https://img.heyuri.net/b/koko.php?res=49587
https://img.heyuri.net/q/koko.php?res=63463
CP spam

Hmm, I wonder which poll I should cast my vote to? Should I pick Chen is Everywhere, or Chen is Everywhere?

Misuse of the quoting feature

https://img.heyuri.net/b/koko.php?res=49846

I feel liek there should be a distinction between someone misusing quotes to make a bullet point list VS someone misusing quotes to troll or tell shitty anecdotes - that 4:3 monitor thread seemed worth keeping around to me, a warning probably would have sufficed

>>63470
Someone should've just told him to make a new one without greentexting and delete the old one

He deleted it himself

>He deleted it himself
Oh... WTF user-san, I wanted to reply to that thread when I was done eating

/b/ got spammed by sharty faggots. I can see why Kaguya wants to hire more mods.

It's like a solid dozen pages of spam, too.

/b/ is getting spammed again

>>63494
>>63495
At least he's helping us get to the 100000 get...

400+ threads. Jesus.

>>63494
It's always been a problem, but it's been happening at an increased rate recently. Not just on /b/ either - Strange World was hit particularly hard a couple days ago, along with the other boards

In my experience, the worst usually occurs around 2-5am UTC, so if that's a time ur usually around and lurking, pls don't hesitate to apply for a baleetion stick if u haven't already: >>63477

>>63494
oh that site...

They do it because they have some sort of vendetta against kuz (even though kuz doesn't own/run this place anymore) and have been known to spam illegal content on sites they don't like. Stay away from them.


The archive and rollback stuff that kokonotsuba has is pretty helpful. Will definitely have to work to get it into futaba-eki and, of course, vichan. (・∀・)

>>63494
This is what Kuz left Heyuri for btw

https://img.heyuri.net/b/koko.php?res=50676

What the fuck is this!? This is not a report, just a simple question

>>63521
i agree, porn could be contained within a subject rather than just a no text post with a old man and his horse of a dick. >>No.50701

>>63522
50701-san is using Heyuri correctly! "X containment" or "Y general" type threads break Rule 6 - making new threads for new topics/images is highly encouraged over grouping everything that falls under a broad category (like "porn") into a single thread

The golden rule is that if it's unrelated or only tangentially-related to a thread OP or a reply, you should post it to the board as a new thread. "Porn General" = no good, "Boobs Thread" = acceptable, "[single image from a particular set/series cuz u want to share/discuss that particular image, posting the rest of that set/series in the form of replies if desired]" = best and how Heyuri is intended to be used

>>63524
perish

>>63523
I understand the viewpoint, however, i somehow feel bad posts should be prevented - if not, our /b/ could fall into 4bads /b/ filled with porn out of control. eitherway, all in all just a thought.

>>63529
A very specific set of circumstances and events occurred to make 4/b/ the way it is, which we don't have to worry about (see: https://img.heyuri.net/b/koko.php?res=48982#p49197 for example)

Stuff liek random vertical iphone solo videos, social media n00dz, etc. have traditionally been baleeted or autosage'd anyway, unless there's something particularly notable/funny about them

For reference, the kinds of pr0ns that have always been allowed and desired on Heyuri is stuff liek Japanese gravure/AV, bizarre/LOLworthy "eFukt" type material, 2000s & retro material, hawt cosplay, etc.

>>63530
>Japanese gravure/AV, bizarre/LOLworthy "eFukt" type material, 2000s & retro material, hawt cosplay, etc.

yes please

Im not worried about that we will turn into /b/, but im more leaning towards the general feelings one get when it's filled with everything else than the "old school wibe" which heyuri is supposted to reflect(?).

spammer on strange worlds - i will hold the line for now.

unsure if i can remove this from vote

>>63566
Yeah looks like kaguya has to remove these manually, the vote board uses log files and i don't think anyone wrote a function to manage polls
Unless i'm wrong, then i guess i'll go fuck myself (・∀・)

did i break strange world? Or is someone else behind the scene?

I was removing a lot of spam and now regular posts also disapears. I only deleted all those 100+ spam...

Anyone else?

Don't carelessly delete everyone's posts from Strange World please - including mine

Assuming it was unintentional, refreshing the deletion page after deleting previous posts will re-delete any new ones coming in the use the same post numbers - it's not like imageboards where if post 1000 is deleted, the next post will be 1001 no matter what, instead there will simply be a new post 1000

Example: if you delete post 7500, 7501, and 7502, then somebody makes a new post 7500 and 7501, AND THEN you refresh the deletion page, it will delete the new 7500 and 7501. You have to close the page and log back into it to prevent that

>>63569
oh no, my bad... sorry everyone one!

Yes - i did refresh the page as more spam continue comming up...

>>63568
あ

I guess i will learn from this experience. Now I know at least!

>>63572
I only figured it out cuz I did exactly the same thing during a previous spamisode

>>63573
amature!
im just being tsundere, we all love mod-sama in secret.

>>50916
Is this considered child porn? I can't tell how old they are.

>>63575
Forgot to link it correctly: https://img.heyuri.net/b/koko.php?res=50916

It's safe, you can reverse search it
https://motherless.com/G1A4AC51/2A1BDCD

>>63577
Thanks.

Motherless being used to prove something is not CP... times have really changed

Spam
https://cgi.heyuri.net/vote/vote.php?p=394

potentially breaking rule 7
https://img.heyuri.net/b/koko.php?res=51585&pagenum=all#p52018

>Discussions about current news or of political nature are allowed, just do not overdo it.

I wouldn't call one single post considerd as overdoing it. A whole thread itself would also be OK. However, if politics was forced upon other threads and all took over and derailed the another thread. - or if all subjects was focused on political topics. That would be overdoing it.

>>63729
Yeah, hopefully it doesn't derail the thread because I originally interpreted the OP as joking, given that its quite a strange position to take and his strange way of speaking

Mods PLEASE
>>>/b/51773

>>63734
img.heyuri.net/b/51773

I can't believe there is a poop on Off-Topic

spamwave on /b/

>>63741
trying my best anon-san

Were the images in this thread removed by moderators or the user?
https://img.heyuri.net/b/koko.php?res=52041

by us as it most likely go against any of our rules.

>>63743
Not I since I have no idea who she is

I didn't see how it broke any rules unless she happens to be an e-famous camwhore on a Rule 8 site or something. Being ugly alone is not a rule breakage

The original poster deleted them

>>63746
Oh I see, the image looked strange so I wasn't sure if it was one of those things where you edit the file a bit or put it in winrar and its illegal content

https://img.heyuri.net/b/koko.php?res=51883#p52460
Would this be in violation of Rule 2? They aren't trading drugs, but they're trading information for getting drugs.

>>63760
shut up nerd

>>63761
I am just asking man （ ´,_ゝ`）

>>63760
erowid is legal enough

>>63760
I think if they actually exchange contact details or instructions for enacting some purchase or trade, they should definitely be deleted. Right now it may or not be fine.

>>63762
Snitches get stitches!

Spam bot

https://img.heyuri.net/b/koko.php?res=52566&pagenum=all#p52620

https://img.heyuri.net/b/koko.php?res=52619&pagenum=all#p52622

https://img.heyuri.net/b/koko.php?res=52624

https://img.heyuri.net/b/koko.php?res=52595

it's not spam, it's just loli scooterday.

Raid
https://img.heyuri.net/b/koko.php?res=52862#p52862
https://img.heyuri.net/b/koko.php?res=52861#p52861
https://img.heyuri.net/b/koko.php?res=52860#p52860

Lol, the posts got removed before I even got to report them

I think we are the only non-4chan English imageboard that have spam removers this fast

spam-kun didn't stand a chance

>>63784
It's really a sight to behold. But I wonder how long mod/janitor-samatachi can keep it up without a proper report form or better.

Requesting assistance in aisle /b- oh, it's already taken care of.

what the fuck what did I do???

>>63880
Do you use a VPN/proxy?

If you do, and ur not the ban-evading Rule 8-posting fag that has recently been crapping up Heyuri using tons of IPs with the exact same first 3 octets as the one ur posting with right now (among other patterns), then I apologize and highly recommend picking a different service or server for the time being

If you are that fag, plz GTFO

>>63881
that's my home ip and I didn't post cp. I just posted a parent beating his child for the lulz. If you are going to ban me please don't do it according to my previus posts instead do it according to the my last post if you still think I'm crapping all over heyuri just check my other posts with that ip. I use vpn from time to time but I don't want to use vpn that often because I post a lot.

Greentext

https://img.heyuri.net/b/koko.php?res=54826#p54854

CP Spam

https://img.heyuri.net/b/koko.php?res=55207

the most recent poll has 10,000 votes on it... i do not know if this is evil hacker or just tr0lling

>>63903
I just spent around 2 hours opening up new tabs and voting on all 5 options over and over again until I got it from like 50 votes to 10000. The poll said to vote as many times as you can so it would have felt wrong to only do like 100 votes since you could easily do way more than that.

Rule 8
https://img.heyuri.net/b/koko.php?res=55535

teh rule 8

https://img.heyuri.net/b/koko.php?res=55590&pagenum=all#p55629

More rule 8 posting

https://img.heyuri.net/b/koko.php?res=55658

>>63908
>>63909
Can any other mod online give a second opinion on this? I am not 100% sure if both of these count as rule 8 or not.

eh? I don't see how any of these are against rule 8. Let them be. there clearly a troll posting this evening so keep your eyes up...

>>63910
55629 is already baleeted (I never saw it so I can't comment), 55658 is not even close to Rule 8

For what it's worth, I didn't consider the now-removed reply 55671 in thread 55550 to be rule-breaking either, it was just poorly worded as far as I could tell (which is fairly common with how グローバル Heyuri is )

nr55671 was ok, but I did removed the 2nd comment from same guy that made it clear it was troll(?) Also seconds after a soy-nerd...

>>63910
>>63912
55629 was pic related. I think it counted as Rule 8, but not entirely sure. I was gonna let it be until someone reported it so I took it down.

>>63915
"cope" here is used as a buzzword, so R8 was justified

"is coffee good for you?" with a random ecchi image is a new 4chan meme, but not something we need to worry about unless it gets annoying

>>63912
"is coffee good for you? [lust provoking image]" is a nu4chan meme that's so common, it even has its own metameme (pic related). Saying it's "not even close" is objectively about as wrong as it gets, although obviously if you think this specific meme is acceptable is, as always, up to you.

>>63917
Obviously I was not aware of it

>>63917
I sort of wonder if we can't sometimes spare things like this, I mean, considering that many heyurians didn't know what it was and responded to it at face value. Plus, I think a gag like this is actually right up Heyuri's alley, as long as you don't post it once a week for an easy laugh.

>>63919
Basically I'm saying that I think it makes us a bit paranoid to take a totally iron-fisted approach to all and every nu-4chan meme, especially in cases when Heyurians don't recognize it as coming from nu-4chan and so reply in an entirely 'Heyurian' way. I think LOLs are preserved in that case, so no harm no foul.

>>63919
kaguya gave it the OK. I think importing memes directly from modern 4chan should be avoided, but it seems loli coffee has a way of easing tensions and allowing some flexibility

Greentexting

https://img.heyuri.net/b/koko.php?res=55231&pagenum=all#p55841

Do threads about incels (such as this one) violate rule 8?
https://dis.heyuri.net/lounge/koko.php?res=275

>>63920
I think what matters is the intent, and 8d already provides an exception clause that technically allows for nu4chan memes (phrased as: so long as it provides LOLs), in other words it basically has to be refactored for use on heyuri.

But I don't think this instance of 'is coffee good for you' was it, and moreover I've seen far more benign r8 breaking content properly modified for contextual use being deleted or autosaged. I guess what kaguya and the mods have to figure out is the boundaries limiting both the use of existing and easily recognizable nu4chan memes vs their awareness of them, and how to apply the rules as heyuri activity picks up and users prefer staying here instead of other venues that contain rule 8 breaking contents (which will result in heyurians increasingly missing knowledge of external memes, but in my opinion, that doesn't change their inherent nature: instead of being original and providing LOLs, they are designed to attract attention in a lizard brain kind of way and provoke reaction, rather than discussion).

I encourage the admin team to think about this and refine rule 8's text to reflect what they come up with.

The ignorance of the 'is coffee good for you' meme is quite weird to me because it's been going on for years and actually started dying down (rather than picking up) recently because of how overused it was, all across 4chan (I believe it started on /g/, though). (´～`)

Then again, I don't understand why e.g. greentext stories are banned. Some of the best threads on 4chan circa 2007 were greentext story threads from the top of my head ┐(ﾟ～ﾟ)┌.

>>63925
I believe with time (through asking for second opinions and avid discussions), the boundaries will slowly yet surely show themselves.

Personally, with the coffee post, the subject being related to Heyuri's slogan ("the place to drink"), alongside the OP picture having actual coffee in it, sort of threw me off on if it was considered rule 8 or not — as, although the post was based off rule 8 breaking content, it was not that content specifically... at least, that's what I thought at first. That is why I asked for a second opinion.

Though, with this post being made right after the talks started happening, the intent of OP might be a bit suspicious (´～`)
https://img.heyuri.net/b/koko.php?res=55719

>>63925
I just noticed, that thread was posted first in 2021, though it got bumped back up recently (ﾟｰﾟ)
In case that matters.

>Do threads about incels (such as this one) violate rule 8?
That one doesn't in my eyes (disclaimer: I made the first reply in that thread), but it depends on the post

In general, I judge threads discussing a phenomenon differently to the phenomenon itself, and I also distinguish between terms that are specific to certain internet-based communities VS terms that have entered the wider public lexicon (Note: that doesn't just mean "commonly seen on Twitter/Reddit")

>The ignorance of the 'is coffee good for you' meme is quite weird to me because it's been going on for years
I haven't ever seen it or noticed, but I stopped going to 4chan in 2014 and have only been back occasionally since 2018 - I generally keep away from the primary Rule 8 hotspots

People posting sexy/weird images with posts that otherwise have nothing to do with it to grab attention are as old as time, but there was nothing about "coffee" specifically that I recall seeing in those, so the coffee thread here didn't make me think of that

>Some of the best threads on 4chan circa 2007 were greentext story threads from the top of my head ┐(ﾟ～ﾟ)┌.
That format didn't exist in 2007 - it started around 2009/2010, and was controversial for a while

>>63930
I could have sworn they were from 2007 or so, but after looking around the interwebz, it seems you're right, they really did only start in 2009-2010. Huh!

Thanks for the explanations

I don't know where else to post it, but I've got a bug report: looks like the same bug as in 4chan. Do you store the thumbnails with just the timestamp as an ID? Don't do that! See the result in this comment: https://img.heyuri.net/b/koko.php?res=55484#p56130

>>63947
LOL
please don't fix this, it's way too funny

>>63947
It's not the first time that happens, but I think not a terrible bug?
https://img.heyuri.net/b/src/1685305089853.jpg
https://img.heyuri.net/b/src/1685305089853.png
https://img.heyuri.net/b/src/1685305089853s.jpg

I don't know PHP, but kokonotsuba is open source so anyone with l33t skills can fix it

>>63949
this is the best bug ever tho...
but maybe it's good if it gets fixed....

>>63949
I wanted to look into it but it seems it's not in fact open source:
https://www.kolyma.org/software/kokonotsuba/

>>63951
Where did you find that link?
I would directly link it, but I want you to please select "Kokonotsuba" from the credits bottom of this page

>>63951
That's an old article, it has been made open source since then: https://github.com/Heyuri/kokonotsuba/

I found that link as the first result on google. Thanks for the source link. Google didn't want to give it to me!

From a quick glance it looks like anything we need is already here: the db field md5chksum already saves the image checksum, all that's left is to use this as the internal filename instead of the timestamp (or use both together, which will basically guarantee no conflict ever, to do that simply concatenate the two keys instead of using just md5chksum in the below).

The db IO code (pio stuff, for each backend) already gives you all the rows in the db for each post, so you already receive the checksum. You have to go in koko.php and find the instances of $tim $ext usages (this reconstitutes imagenames) and replace this by using $md5chksum instead of $tim everywhere this is used (including for the thumbnail that will involve just passing the $tim part to a function that resolves the name, or appending s to the name... anyway, straightforward).
The variables corresponding to the database columns are made local to the functions (in for example
https://github.com/Heyuri/kokonotsuba/blob/eb09e6777fe329bd6788ebbb0bad68e6e0fd89fe/koko.php#L1026
) through the 'extract' method that just imports symbols into the local namespace. Hence, there's no need for any extra work to access any arbitrary column.

The caveat is that unless you write a script to rename all files currently on the server to their md5 (which you can access via the db at least), you will either need to wipe or get broken files.

You will also have to apply this modification to any mods you use (e.g. anigif), and in some pio functions (for example https://github.com/Heyuri/kokonotsuba/blob/e0cb2c2570cf1590c76d21f8172cf6c0631ad68c/lib/pio/pio.mysqli.php)

I vote keep the bug - it's a classic and always provides LOLs

New r8 complaint
https://dis.heyuri.net/lounge/koko.php?res=5205&q=5229

https://img.heyuri.net/b/koko.php?res=56693
OP image and #56697 are R8
(discord irony meme)

>>63986
i would't know about dicksword, but i looked it up and source is from 2015.

https://youtu.be/I-K-Gzrlxr0

off-topic is being flooded right now

kaguya could you please tell your mod friend to stop this fuckery

>>64017
I did that. I don't remember the exact reason, but I was sure there was a good reason to ban you. You should have taken the first nuke as a warn
Also checking now, you recently got banned twice for Rule 9, which we pretty much only enforce for ban evaders who deserve to get banned again
If your intentions aren't actually bad, please lurk at least a few weeks before posting again.

>>64018
I told you to stop this shenanigan but you didn't listen that's why I'm asking this from kaguya cuz he seems much more of a reasonable guy also stop banning me for no reason I won't wait for 2 years to post

This lack of punctuation seems familiar...

>>64019
ID:ADMIN is me
Really, not banning you is what would be unreasonable

Noone ever gets banned for "no reason". To get banned for that long, you must have deliberately done something worse than accidentally breaking Rule 8
We don't actually expect you or anyone else who gets banned for such long periods to wait out their ban, instead, such long bans are just another way to say "GTFO!!1". Kokonotsuba doesn't have a permanent ban option at ban panel, so we give out years-long bans instead

>>64020
>This lack of punctuation seems familiar
that's my style of writing it can also be interpreted as a tripcode
>To get banned for that long, you must have deliberately done something worse than accidentally breaking Rule 8
I explained it here >>63885 now that the mod has memorized my home ip whenenever I post without a vpn I get the ban since I don't change my country that often while using vpn he blind shots me every so often

>>64035
what's the issue?

>>64036
It's gone now, so nothing.

Why was 58073 on /b/ removed?

>>64044
I... don't think that's against any rules?

>>64045
typical nu4chan catchphrase

>>64045
Maybe it's not clear since it has now been deleted. The URL pointed to the first comment in the thread, which said "built for BBC".

>>64050
Ah, OK. Thanks for the clarification.

>>64042
no answer... （ ´,_ゝ`）

>>64079
what was it?

Is this rule 8?
https://dis.heyuri.net/lounge/koko.php?res=5342&q=5364
regarding "not my problem"

>>64081
It doesn't look like it, unless the term "not my problem" is a new 4chan buzzword that I haven't picked up on (´￢`)

>>64080
i said something on the liivid thread about fags never being happy unless they are the main stage for everything. i made another reply that was similar to the first so i dont understand why the first one was deleted. the second one i made was 58194

>>64082
It is. Typically looks like this, sometimes preceded by quotes/context. The usual format is.

>something
Not my problem

or
>pic
Not my problem

>>64084
From the context of the thread, the sentence "not my problem" does not give a rule 8 feeling to it, as that is a genuine phrase compared to the one-word buzzwords like "dilate"

Phew, I thought I had broken the rule

I'd recommend being a little more lenient with the enforcement of unestablished Rule 8 breakages if you are unaware of common, age-old English phrases and idioms

A while back I saw some idiot on another imageboard srsly trying to argue that "X as fuck" was a Redditism... a common English phrase that English speakers have frequently used for many decades that even the elderly use, never mind internet users

Popular phrases are obviously going to be commonly-sighted on popular websites - that doesn't mean those websites invented or popularized them!

58340 on /b/ buzzword "normie"

>>64089
"Normie" is not Rule 8, even if it is a st00pid term (as is "normalfag", which is newer than "normie")

It's worth mentioning that hating on "normies" can still be rule breaking

>>64087
As fuck, when rendered as "af", is definitely a redditism, although when rendered as "as fuck", it is not.

Not my problem is not even a common phrase. "This is not my problem", "well it's not my problem" is common to some extent, but just "not my problem" is virtually only used in nuWeb form (i.e. stated alone as a reply and/or with a corresponding picture, as in my example, sometimes associated with "boomer memes"). A little internet sleuthing will show that it is widely recognized as a meme, and further digging will reveal that its oldest instance in this form appears to be 2020 (I could have sworn it was a bit older than that though).

In fact, the reason why I said 'not my problem' is because it leaked out unconsciously due to how common it is as a meme. I only realized after the post was through and I was rereading it. In some other circumstances I could just as well have typed 'based' or 'cringe', as much as I hate all that shit.

Also, just because a phrase exists doesn't mean that the phrase is in common parlance outside memespeak, nor does it mean that the specific way it's used is normal English. A good example is 'cringe'. Cringe is a common English word, often used in real life in many situations. It has been especially popular in online publications for a long time. But it is used thus: "he got hit by the ball and cringed from the pain" "this is such a cringeworthy opinion" "I cringe when I think about that time". Never simply "cringe.", which is a meme.

Regarding the question of normie/normalfag: while normie is certainly very old and normalfag is far newer, normie made a resurgence as an attempt to purify 'normalfag' 'discussion' for use outside 4chan and entered 4chan parlance through the increased volume of outsiders posting there. It is also used as nuWeb slang and in the nuWeb "way", similar to "I am cringing about this" vs "cringe". The difficulty here is that the syntactic usage of both the new and old version of 'normie' is identical, unlike with 'not my problem' or 'cringe'. The other poster is certainly right that it's commonly used as a buzzword rather than, say, a convenient communication shorthand. Does it count as r8? You have said no, and so it shall be.

Is the intent of teh rulez "do not use nuWeb buzzwords", or is it "do not use phrases as low-effort buzzwords as is commonly done in other places"?

The of teh rulez is "have fun", some people are over-overthinking what's allowed and not allowed
Most of the time, when we delete posts with buzzwords it's because they ruin the fun/create a tenser(?) atmosphere.

For example, rules state "based" is a B& word - it indeed is and I've deleted many posts over it. But think of a scenario where a new user who isn't well versed about rules makes a longpost that's generally fun and informing, and then a user calls him a newfag over that one word, which post do you think sux in this case? This is based on a real event from the past

I'm trying to say don't over-worry about the rules. Just try to follow them the best you can, but let us handle deciding what is allowed and not allowed. And if/when you don't like our decisions, you can of course complain on Site Discussion@Heyuri so we reconsider them.

>I only realized after the post was through and I was rereading it
If you regret making a post, you can always delete them and repost it in the way you like.

As for the word "cringe" see >>63390 - I am not the one to talk about usage of these words in old or day-to-day English

>The of teh rulez
The intent*

>Not my problem is not even a common phrase. "This is not my problem", "well it's not my problem" is common to some extent, but just "not my problem" is virtually only used in nuWeb form
That's not true, although it's definitely a case of informal vs formal (and Heyuri is very informal ), and I suspect it's also somewhat regional

It's very common where I come from to not include the subject at the start of a sentence - you will regularly hear/read phrases like "not my problem" over "it's/that's not my problem", "can't be bothered" over "I can't be bothered", "don't care" over "I don't care", "looks stupid" over "It/that looks stupid", and so on

Just for fun, I did a search on old.sage.moe for "not my problem", and here's some of the earliest examples that show up (keeping in mind there are big gaps missing in the archive):

https://old.sage.moe/r/thread/61098/#61196 (Feb 2005)
https://old.sage.moe/b/thread/6935505/#6935599 (Apr 2006)
https://old.sage.moe/b/thread/7457956/#7458020 (May 2006)
https://old.sage.moe/b/thread/7894158/#7894329 (May 2006)
https://old.sage.moe/b/thread/8917577/#8920072 (Jun 2006)
https://old.sage.moe/b/thread/9083140/#9087046 (Jun 2006)

Also, a quick search showed me that the 17th episode of the Animorphs TV series was titled "Not My Problem", and that aired in 1999: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animorphs_(TV_series)#Episodes

So regardless of how kiddies might be using it outside of Heyuri in recent years, I think it's safe to say it's a common and old phrase... which I already knew since I've said it my whole life

>Regarding the question of normie/normalfag: while normie is certainly very old and normalfag is far newer, normie made a resurgence as an attempt to purify 'normalfag' 'discussion' for use outside 4chan and entered 4chan parlance through the increased volume of outsiders posting there
Thing is, Heyuri has been trying to stave off the grumpy group of late-2000s to mid-2010s imageboard users who were butthurt over "normie" being used instead of "normalfag" circa 2015 just as much as it is staving off those who were/are commonly using it. That's why it's best to use neither, or just not care about it at all

>>64099
Of the 4chan examples, I count only 2 that follow the pattern. Media names hardly ever count for anything, they're not made of commonly spoken phrases. For example, I'm certain I can find many tv show episodes named "cringe", and google says
>the word "cringeworthy" was popularized by the introduction of the character Cuthbert Cringeworthy to the British comic strip The Bash Street Kids in 1972.

The word based was used since the 1980's as slang for some drug users, especially among black communities.
I guess that means cringe and based are totally not nuWeb/4chan slangs and should be freely allowed then?

Let's look at search results. Here I used subject to minimize false hits. Statistically you expect memes to appear in subjects when they become popular if the probability is IID.
https://desuarchive.org/_/search/subject/not%20my%20problem/order/asc/
As you can see, the first relevant post is in 2021 on /int/, which prompted a series of posts since then with the same format. Before hand, there were few to no mentions of 'not my problem', with the absolute oldest being in 2012, when part of a subject field. After that post, you get dozens a day on every board.

Using the same strategy also reveals that based and cringe were introduced in 2012: with the based god album on /mu/, then 2 weeks later with the first non-/mu/ thread on /g/ calling steve jobs 'based'. For cringe, /r9k/ "cringe threads" seems to be the origin.
"cringe" and "based" were used in other ways since at least 2008, and I'm sure if you try hard enough you will definitely find drug talk that looks like they're using based in the same way nu4chan does now.
This is consistent with other data I can find on the first use of those memes, so this strategy seems to give rather accurate results.

"But it's an old phrase" OK then let's let everyone spam "based based based" and "cringe cringe cringe", old phases from the 70's and 80's are kosher after all.

I remain steadfast and adamant that proper internet history(tm) ought to not be mangled too much, even when it comes to the garbage that we wade through today.
FACTS:
- not my problem is a meme
- it is a nu4chan meme
- it dates back from 2020-2021
- just because a phrase exists doesn't mean a meme which text is the phrase is magically not a meme.
- The proof is in the pudding: just 4 total posts between 2008 and 2021 (starting in 2012) with this phrase in the title at all, and a flood starting in 2021.

>>64093
Thanks for the explanation. I will keep this in mind.

most pointless argument evar, considering we all know the post in question isn't a problem. don't worry, no one here has encyclopedic knowledge on bad nu4chan memes (except you maybe, DO7i.2ic-san ) and if they do they won't use it to bully you.
just be a sincere poster and it'll all be alright

thats it. pack your bags. we beat the game. we have officially become so socially retarded that we have individuals among us that actually believe "not my problem" is some nu-4chan term and not just another turn of phrase thats been used since at least WW2.

>>64113
Not him but I think he was specifically referring to OP posts with an image of something bad and the only accompanying text being 'not my problem'

https://ayashii.net/bbs.php?m=tree&s=8431&c=58
ad

https://img.heyuri.net/b/koko.php?res=58770#p58770

reddit copypasta

That was a 4chan copypasta, and totally innocuous:
https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/john-is-kill

Can everyone stop being retarded over Rule 8 plz, kthx

Scriptkiddie fail... Already deleted but posting to laugh at it

>>64120
im retarded what does it mean?

>>64121
$_SERVER['PHP_SELF'] is just the path of the imageboard php script on the server.
$modified_params_str is... i have no idea, it doesn't even exist in kokonotsuba's source code.
My bet is that he just copied a "XSS attack example" from some random website, without even knowing what any of this means

https://img.heyuri.net/b/koko.php?res=58818
Another CP spam post

https://ayashii.net/bbs.php?m=tree&s=8439&c=58
ad

https://img.heyuri.net/b/koko.php?res=59189
59381 twitter meme

>>64149
is it really? I haven't seen it before, and the image itself isn't bad

Soyjack

https://img.heyuri.net/b/koko.php?res=60167#p60258

Linking teh rule 8 b0rking site without context

https://img.heyuri.net/b/koko.php?res=60256#p60257

What was that for?

>What was that for?
Teh LOLs

Oi why did my post in https://img.heyuri.net/b/koko.php?res=60858#p60858 get deleted?

>>64201
I didn't see the post, what was it?

>>64202
something like this:

>dat original price
yeah you should

>>64203
Ah, in that case you probably got hit for Rule 8.e:
>"Greentext stories" or any misuse of the quoting feature.

You shouldn't have been muted by janitor-san for such a minor infraction though - that's only supposed to be used on flooders and persistent, intentional rule-breakers

>>64203
That is R8.e
>any misuse of the quoting feature

You could have quoted it these ways:
>97% OFF
>Sale price: 330 JPY
...Or simply didn't use quoting feature and formatted your message in another way.

Your post wasn't irritating, but simply not the way we do on Heyuri.

>>64204
Ah, you beat me

>and persistent, intentional rule-breakers
Intentional rule breakers deserve more than a few minutes of ban

That said, janitor-san didn't mute 64203-san - he just deleted the post

>That said, janitor-san didn't mute 64203-san - he just deleted the post
I'd assumed it was this one:
JANITOR ([janitor IP]): 07/01/23 15:01:17: Muted [user IP] and deleted post No.60886

>Intentional rule breakers deserve more than a few minutes of ban
Sure, but janitor-san can't do that

>>64207
60886 was a different IP, check 60859 on the log (which was from the same IP as 64203-san here)
I don't actually expect you to bother with comparing IPs each time, as I can just check from our dicksword webhook

>Sure, but janitor-san can't do that
Right, I don't think there is much we can do if intentional rule breakers get away with simple mutes

>>64205
>>64206
Just for the record, should jannies delete posts that use greentext? I always thought it could be a warning/reminder on the thread itself, but now that I think about it I'm not sure if janny powers can tell which one is a repeat offender or not (´～`)

I don't expect janitors to know what exactly is R8 or not, so just leave stuff up when you aren't sure what to do. Deleting spam should be your primary werk
That said unless there is a really good reason for not doing so, I delete greentext stuff myself anyways.

>Just for the record, should jannies delete posts that use greentext?
It depends on the intent, at least for me

If it's clearly a well-intentioned poster who is simply unfamiliar with Heyuri and teh r00lz, then no. If it's clearly a fag looking to crap the place up, then yes. If there's any doubt, assume the former

https://img.heyuri.net/b/koko.php?res=60844#p60984

tiktok image + it's one of those intentionally low quality images used by teens on discord servers.

I didn't expect so much trouble to come from me deleting greentext. I didn't mute him, I swear it! ( ´ω`)(´～`)

>I didn't mute him, I swear it!
That was a mistaken accusation on my part since the action log is difficult to read, s0z

https://img.heyuri.net/b/koko.php?res=61218#p61218

The OP's image is based on a soyjack meme "Life or death for Berryboy"

The soy meme for comparison: https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/002/566/821/4f1.jpeg

also, even if it wasn't related to soyjak autism it would still have to be deleted because it contains all the marks of a modern nonsensical "meme"
- no real substance, no joke
- a reference just for the sake of referencing, which is often the "joke"
- azumanga characters, because they're popular (at the moment)

>>64226
Deleted. If any mod/jannie has any objections, please do say something!

maybe you could have just deleted the image? I thought the chiyo-chan pic posted in that thread was pretty sexy, despite it feeling immoral too

>>64231
When should I delete the image vs. the thread? The thread was made alongside the image, so I am a bit confused about that.

>>64232
I couldn't tell you which decision is the right one, I'm just speaking out of my own selfish desires

>When should I delete the image vs. the thread? The thread was made alongside the image, so I am a bit confused about that.
This is just how I personally do things:

- Firstly, unless it's CP, I should be able to prove that an image or comment is rule-breaking if questioned on it. Don't just deem something 2 be rule-breaking simply cuz I or another user personally haet it or has labelled it rule-breaking without evidence

- If the image breaks a rule but the OP comment & resulting replies r fine, baleet image only

- If the OP comment sux (e.g. breaks a rule) and the replies also suck (e.g. shitflinging, meta outside /q/, Serious Business, etc.), either autosage or baleet thread, depending on level of suckage. Don't baleet it unless totally sure (probably best for janitor-san to leave it alone or bring it up on /q/)

- If the OP comment sux but the replies = WINrar/hawtness, ban OP and leave thread up. Baleeting any form of WIN or "legal in Atlantis!" hawtness on Heyuri is a crime against interwebs. Heyuri's b0ners are 2 b protected at ALL COSTS

>>64234
>Heyuri's b0ners are 2 b protected at ALL COSTS
Mod-sama is my hero!!

>Heyuri's b0ners are 2 b protected at ALL COSTS
On that note, since 64231-san asked, here's that Chiyo image. Get it while it's fresh. (´￢`)

I saved the others from pixiv, too. time to start a new thread to post them in!

>>64234
Thank you for the insight mod-san! ヽ(´∇`)ノ