Site Discussion@Heyuri

test

Your post did not appear. Please try again.

>>60909

:tehegg:

:tehegg:

https://test.com/#test
https://test.com#test

▲

▲▲

 ▲
▲ ▲

>>62016
epic fail

s1
s2
s3
s4
s5
s6
s7
normal text

ｷﾀ━━━(・∀・)━━━!!ｷﾀ━━━(・∀・)━━━!!(ﾟｰﾟ)ｷﾀ━━━(・∀・)━━━!!ｷﾀ━━━(・∀・)━━━!!ｷﾀ━━━(・∀・)━━━!!ｷﾀ━━━(・∀・)━━━!!(＾Д^)(;ﾟДﾟ)(＾Д^)（⌒∇⌒ゞ）(´￢`)Σ(ﾟдﾟ|||)(＾Д^)(;´Д`)(;ﾟДﾟ)(＾Д^)（⌒∇⌒ゞ）ヽ(`Д´)ノヽ(`Д´)ノ

(ﾟｰﾟ)

[s14]test[/s14]

nipahh

What's the point of SAGEing an old thread if discord NIGGERS hear about it and decide to post on the thread without SAGE afterwards

(´人｀)

>>62839
I think only few people is actually actively checking discord notifications.

He makes a good point. We could make it so that saged posts dont show in the webhook very easy.

kaguya, thoughts?

Not kaguya, but it's handy for staff-san and users to be able to see new sage'd posts that come in without having to constantly be F5ing the mod panel - there's been cases in the past where shenanigans were happening in old threads using sage, and the only reason it was caught was thx 2 dicksword notifications

ww

testtesttesttesttesttest

test

test

test

testtest

test

ｷﾀ━━━(・∀・)━━━!!

is there a way to sage without sending sage an e-mail?

>>62993
Nope, unless the thread is autosage'd by staff-san or is 7+ days old (the latter only applies to /b/)

>>62994
oh ok
[s10]SAGE![/s5]

Your fortune: Look behind you

test

test

test

test

ｷﾀ━━━(・∀・)━━━!!

test

test

Test
Test

test
BOKU

test

falg

ｷﾀ━━━(ﾟ∀ﾟ)━━━!!