testMarked for deletion (Old)
test
Your post did not appear. Please try again.
>>60909
:tehegg:
https://test.com/#testhttps://test.com#test
▲▲▲
▲
▲▲
▲▲ ▲
>>62016epic fail
s1s2s3s4s5s6s7normal text
ｷﾀ━━━(・∀・)━━━!!ｷﾀ━━━(・∀・)━━━!!(ﾟｰﾟ)ｷﾀ━━━(・∀・)━━━!!ｷﾀ━━━(・∀・)━━━!!ｷﾀ━━━(・∀・)━━━!!ｷﾀ━━━(・∀・)━━━!!(＾Д^)(;ﾟДﾟ)(＾Д^)（⌒∇⌒ゞ）(´￢`)Σ(ﾟдﾟ|||)(＾Д^)(;´Д`)(;ﾟДﾟ)(＾Д^)（⌒∇⌒ゞ）ヽ(`Д´)ノヽ(`Д´)ノ
(ﾟｰﾟ)
[s14]test[/s14]
nipahh
What's the point of SAGEing an old thread if discord NIGGERS hear about it and decide to post on the thread without SAGE afterwards (´人｀)
(´人｀)
>>62839I think only few people is actually actively checking discord notifications.
He makes a good point. We could make it so that saged posts dont show in the webhook very easy.kaguya, thoughts?
Not kaguya, but it's handy for staff-san and users to be able to see new sage'd posts that come in without having to constantly be F5ing the mod panel - there's been cases in the past where shenanigans were happening in old threads using sage, and the only reason it was caught was thx 2 dicksword notifications
ww
testtesttesttesttesttesttesttesttesttesttesttestｷﾀ━━━(・∀・)━━━!!
is there a way to sage without sending sage an e-mail?
>>62993Nope, unless the thread is autosage'd by staff-san or is 7+ days old (the latter only applies to /b/)
>>62994oh ok[s10]SAGE![/s5]
Your fortune: Look behind youtest
ｷﾀ━━━(・∀・)━━━!!
TestTest
testBOKU
falg
ｷﾀ━━━(ﾟ∀ﾟ)━━━!!