Things I've seen get deleted recently:

A reply in a thread about licking girls that mentioned licking a lolis chest: deleted

Another unrelated reply about licking a lolis feet: deleted

A guy who said he would get a boner if he saw JC pantsu: deleted

A guy posting 2D loli ero and stating that he wanted to have sex with her: deleted

During the last townhall, pasting from HHS, we decided on

- 2D loli pr0n threads that only serve to share erotic loli-focused images will be moved to /l/ (at staff-san's discretion)
- Common derailment topics (2D loli pr0n, pee/scat, etc.) will be clamped down on a little harder in certain cases (at staff-san's discretion)

First one is easy to enforce and I believe not too disruptive to user since it's only a case of a thread being moved to another board.
Second was agreed on a time where there was a lot of board domination on loli. It wasn't meant to keep Off-Topic entirely loli/lolikon-free. It's the natural tendency of a lolicon to occasionally mention his fantasies, and -as with any other fetish- has the right to exist on off-topic.
I (a rorikon) also think any board looks bettar with a sprinkle of lolicon, a stance I didn't change since since posting >>61120

I still support the community decision made during the townhall, and don't have anything to propose other than being a bit softer on rorikon.

Replying a point a mod made on CGI about it being forced by a handful of users - it also doesn't matter even if it's a single user, the rule is against board domination, not clamping down on content (lolicon or not) posted by a single user if he isn't posting frequently enough that it seems excessive. We once had a single person posting about planes too in that regard, yet noone suggested banning him because he is the only one interested in planes.
because we also once had more rorikon users, who might have left due to crackdowns...

>>70731
>I still support the community decision made during the townhall, and don't have anything to propose other than being a bit softer on rorikon.

Restore those posts then. The anti-loli crusade is going too far

I gathered some recent rori deletions to go by example, I'll post a few so feel free to give your opinions if a post was fine or not

>A reply in a thread about licking girls that mentioned licking a lolis chest: deleted
Yeah, I don't think mention of a loli chest lickage after mentions of licking butth0les or stuffing JK socks in mouth was excessive... This is ignoring the fact that poster knowingly b0rk Rule 8 (we already discussed that "smash that yeah button" is rule 8 in the past), so deletion itself was justified.

I'm just posting some examples nao, even if some of them are doomed with each staff having their own discretion. "Anti-loli" may be a bit accusatory when they are cool about lolicon, but where to draw the line exactly is harder to decide on.

ｷﾀ━━━(ﾟ∀ﾟ)━━━!!

We agreed on sharing actual guides on seducing children may be off-limits in the past, but this post was only joking about it so posting anyways

>>>/b/191145
I hope it stays up...

I noticed this deletion after the fact, but deleting the mere suggestion of not being attracted to +18 ADULT WOMEN was excessive imo.

This is the most that was deleted past 2 weeks (then deleted posts get purged 4 good), some lame CP jokes were deleted too but those were more understandable.

>>70734
lold

I move 2D loli threads from Off-Topic to 2D Lolikon if I think they would be a perfect fit there - e.g. a thread simply sharing 2D loli pics, discussion solely related to 2D loli topics (e.g. "who's your favorite loli artist?", "post loli figures"), etc. I've done the same for other "we have a board for that" topics, but such cases are very rare

If it's a non-loli-specific thread like "ITT post pics that give u teh b0ner" or "here's a bunch of stuff I imported from Japan", and 2D loli gets posted along the way, it's not going to get moved or deleted (unless they included a comment referencing IRL kiddies, which is sometimes the case)

>if he isn't posting frequently enough that it seems excessive
It is excessive - it only doesn't seem as excessive now because we're 1.5 years into making efforts to delete anything related to sexualizing 3D/IRL kiddies, and moving straight-up 2D rori threads to the 2D rori board

There's been points in Heyuri history when it was difficult to make any thread at all and have it not derail into loli/pedo territory - not because the majority of users want it that way, but because of a small minority who won't allow threads about anything else to go un-loli'd

>>70738
You're missing that he was giving a genuine guide/recommendation on how to prey on real children online - the emphasized "18+ ADULT WOMEN" part was just a "they can't ban me if I replace 'little girls' with this" attempt

>>70741
>but because of a small minority who won't allow threads about anything else to go un-loli'd

A clique of non-users from CGI Chat don't repesent the majority of people actually making and fapping to threads on Heyuri. If you only consider the latter, then a liberal stance is supported.

Mentioning lolis in a thread related to sexual topics in general is one of the basic rights enshrined in the Heyuri Constitution!

>>70728
theres more to the world of posting than rori and fapping my dude

>A clique of non-users from CGI Chat don't repesent the majority of people actually making and fapping to threads on Heyuri.
Such a clique doesn't exist, and Chat@Heyuri is irrelevant to everything I said in the previous post. For what it's worth, Chat@Heyuri regulars are all main site users - including frequent thread makers, fappers, and die-hard lolicons

Heyuri prior to 2023-2024 didn't have the "every thread derails into loli/pedo" issue - the phenomenon arrived after the big New Year 2023 influx, which brought in a couple of MAPfags and loli spammers. Off-Topic@Heyuri is at its best when there's variety and unpredictable...ness

>Mentioning lolis in a thread related to sexual topics in general is one of the basic rights enshrined in the Heyuri Constitution!
Yeah, and it's allowed unless ur clearly referring to 3D/IRL loli or are breaking some other rule. Whether we should simply delete such posts or edit out the rule-breaking parts is something yet to be discussed - I'm personally not a fan of post editing

i find it odd that an influx of people have come in in a short period and made this an issue again when it hasn't been one in months... i mean, a new user comes into chat yesterday (who has somehow already been mentioned in this thread) and INSTANTLY started asking where they can find chio penguin... insisting sites be named, arguing with mods, derailing conversation, not wanting to talk about anything else. call me a schizo but it strikes me as odd and maybe even entrapment...
Rules on lolicon have, 1, already been decided by townhall and 2, mod discretion is baked into site rules... lolicon has its whole own board and also threads on /b/ (ive even made them) frequently, its not like mods are trying to purge the site of lolicons or something. I think its best the way things are now where heyuri is a site with lolicons and not a lolicons site.