that's a shota so it should be moved again to /j/

this just in: there's a lolikon board for sharing 2D loli images https://img.heyuri.net/l/

>You can not post lolis to the off topic board anymore
you can, but if its a plain loli image thread or dedicated to sharing loli images it can get moved to /l/ AFAIK. but its not a srs bzns

she (he?) should be moved to my house ヽ(´ー｀)ノ

It was decided at the last Townhall (July 2025) that "2D rori threads that only serve to share rori images [...] (i.e. threads posted to Off-Topic, 2D Cute, 2D Ero, etc.)" will "be contained to /l/" (at staff-san's discretion as usual)

https://up.heyuri.net/src/4593.txt ([2025-07-05 22:44:52] to [2025-07-05 22:55:01])

Image-only loli threads have been moved to /l/ dozens of times, but usually not while leaving a shadow thread (which is pointless in most cases)

your thread would get one reply and not really contribute to anything

>>69809
is that a rule? that your threads have to "get more than one reply" in order to stay up?

>is that a rule? that your threads have to "get more than one reply" in order to stay up?
No

>>69810
>is that a rule? that your threads have to "get more than one reply" in order to stay up?
no but it will definitely unclog /b/ from threads like yours

>>69812
"unclog"

Its clear kaguya is trying for some reason to make Heyuri advertiser friendly. First step, ban loli threads from appearing outside a dedicated containment board which eventually will be hid from advertisers(USER WAS RETARDED FOR THIS POST)

>>69813
single thread image with no subject or comment attached i don't know what else to say but to throw your thread in the landfill that is /l/ ┐(ﾟ～ﾟ)┌

Usually, threads don't need to be constrictuve/srs/"high quality" or whatever grants replies to them on anywhere @ Heyuri.
It's only the case with rori threads because of the decision taken in the last townhall. Moderator-san already posted the link, but since humans are lazy, here's part the discussion


[2025-07-05 22:44:52] kaguya◆V4Zyo2onG6: Should 2D rori threads that only serve to share rori images be contained to /l/? (i.e. threads posted to Off-Topic, 2D Cute, 2D Ero, etc.)
[2025-07-05 22:45:00] yakuruto: yes
[2025-07-05 22:45:03] Bakaice: yeah
[2025-07-05 22:45:09] 天使: yes!
[2025-07-05 22:45:09] pezident: No!
[2025-07-05 22:45:09] pen: thats what /l/ is for
[2025-07-05 22:45:09] Anonymous: yes
[2025-07-05 22:45:14] komeo: sounds good to me, we can move threads now too so it's easy
[2025-07-05 22:45:18] schizophrenic: isnt that why 2d loli board was made
[2025-07-05 22:45:20] pezident: lolison all boards :D
[2025-07-05 22:45:28] kaguya◆V4Zyo2onG6: I am against removing it altogether from off toppic only
[2025-07-05 22:45:37] 天使: any loli should stay in /l/!
[2025-07-05 22:45:38] kaguya◆V4Zyo2onG6: but then we have thread moving option
[2025-07-05 22:45:40] yakuruto: i think it depends
[2025-07-05 22:45:47] yakuruto: if its ero, it should be moved to /l/ no question
[2025-07-05 22:45:47] pptn: i dont think it should be banned but people who do it should be laughed at and tarred and feathered sure
[2025-07-05 22:45:48] not 天使: if they dont have any text sure
[2025-07-05 22:45:54] Cygnus: agreed. why do we have a /l/ board then? but i dont thinl it should be entirely removed from /b/
[2025-07-05 22:45:56] schizophrenic: if its loli ero it should be in loli board
[2025-07-05 22:45:59] yakuruto: if its non-ero, then to /c/
[2025-07-05 22:46:00] pezident: well if its ero loli, it should b on /l/ i guess
[2025-07-05 22:46:01] NyaKo: i do not like forcing loli to /l/ only
[2025-07-05 22:46:02] pptn: does kokonotsuba not allow threads to be moved elsewhere
[2025-07-05 22:46:06] Anonymous: Only if it;s for image dumping.
[2025-07-05 22:46:07] kaguya◆V4Zyo2onG6: no, the topic is strictly about dedicated loli threads - loli can otherwise be posted anywhere still
[2025-07-05 22:46:10] nanoshi: i think only ero should be contained to /l/
[2025-07-05 22:46:12] not 天使: loli ero with text should be on /b/
[2025-07-05 22:46:16] Bakaice: yeah only if its image dumping
[2025-07-05 22:46:17] anonwaha◆bGTvsQ3YBE: a lot of the "non-ero" on /c/ is very ero
[2025-07-05 22:46:23] yakuruto: that's true...
[2025-07-05 22:46:27] LVO: loli is nice every where
[2025-07-05 22:46:36] 天使: organize!
(... rest is too long for maximum allowed comment size, read it from logs)

While it's hard for the rorikon to wholeheartedly support the outcome, it's probably for the best since we don't want to bore the non-rorikon userbase too much
In any case, KgzkFQDk-san's opinion about what off-topic board is supposed to consist of does not represent Heyuri's current policy either

>>69814
Pretty sure /l/ was initially hidden by default, which was then changed (I might be wrong though). In which case the opposite of what you said would be the case

>>69817
was this before the overboard was invented?

>was this before the overboard was invented?
No - teh overboard was restored a year earlier. That was the reason why we restored/created additional imageboards (including /l/) besides /b/jp/q/ in the first place

seriously why are the mods so fucking sensitive? you cant even make a light hearted thread on /q/ without it being deleted


theres a reason we dont want every thread being moved to /l/ - its a dead board and your posts wont even get a single reply. that is not the case on /b/

>>69827
I can see all the posts targeting Heyuri's moderation and some mods directly - which I can also see got deleted in grounds of spamming. I don't see a proper explanation from our side for your case so undoing this deletion in slight chance you are a lolicon in good faith.

Site discussion is usually a more SRSBZNS board and (at least from my perspective) your posts were simply inviting drama over moderator actions done out of the democratically taken decisions during the townhall this July. It's not every thread, it's merely the single pictures that would fit on 2D Lolikon.
It's not apparent if your posts were light-hearted, especially when you were reposting them again and again upon deletion - that's usually what trolls and spammers do.

Unrelated to the policy decided during the townhall - while 2D Lolikon has a lower PPD than off-topic, we have long encouraged posting content on boards other than off-topic to battle that.

mahiro was changed into a female, she has no PENIS, thus not a shota. And arguably not loli either because she has had her period... but i know that is an unpopular opinion these days

>>69827
>its a dead board
only if you dont post...
i think there are less posts because people (wrongly) assume it is just a place to dump images and fap, not discuss lolis. If it was known for a place where conversation could happen, then maybe more people would post?

>seriously why are the mods so fucking sensitive?
U srs?

In both cases today, it was a case of baka OPs assuming the worst and throwing shitfits the moment that any form of moderation took place... despite the fact that the only "moderation" in question (until the subsequent shitfits) was their thread being moved to a more appropriate board based on community decisions that have been in effect for the past 6 months. Now that's "fucking sensitive"

>you cant even make a light hearted thread on /q/ without it being deleted
I'll add that we've always filed "ironic shitposting" (posts that mockingly imitate the mannerisms of a given target; especially when invoking Poe's law; especially when intended to insult/enrage all or specific Heyuri users rather than make them laugh) under Rule 8 ever since we've had a Rule 8

It used to be explicitly listed under Rule 8, but in 2022 we had a ton of n00bs who were unfamiliar with the term (plus we'd decided the term "shitposting" itself was somewhat Rule 8-breaking), so it was reworded in the spur-of-the-moment to "Posts intended to annoy or enrage other users without even having the decency to provide LOLs" - which I'll admit, as teh one who originally wrote it, isn't much clearer

>>69833
I think calling those deleted threads ironic shitposting is a stretch

That is a meme/thread format that was pretty common in 4chan of old.

we need a loli-liberation army NAO!

>>69834
Eh that's true, but personally I think "parodying the site we're on" causes users to become overly self-conscious and can lead to the adoption of overcorrective behaviors (which is what happened to 4chan to its own detriment)

I wasn't the one who baleeted it, but regardless, I've restored it