Hetero sex banned? But i want a boyfriend!

>>1967
you can still have a boyfriend, it just means making some changes

How can they have a boyfriend if its banned

Also idk why anybody on this schizo website would care if something is a "tolerable belief". I mean like banning hetero sounds stupid and weird asfuk but this is the weird asfuk website so like. ???

How are het relations unethical?

>>1973
you see, its a power imbalance. men are big, and strong, and have a violent p*nis... and.. what were we talking about?

>>1970
Ur "het is unethical" hot take just kinda sounds like ur trolling, but if ur not trolling, the only thing I can think of for "it just means making some changes" probably goes against Rule 7 of the global site rules regardless of /j/ posters' personal "tolerance for ur beliefs" or whatevs, like heyuri mite not b the site 4 u
https://www.heyuri.net/index.php?p=rules

>>1976
Maybe she means lobotomizing the male?

>>1972
its only weird because most people are weird and bad. we could fix it if we cared to.

>>1973
its a knowledge problem, you see. if you dont know someone, and you cant know someone because youre so different from them, then you are simply incapable of truly loving them. sure you can sleep together, you can hold each other, and you can do romantic things together, but in all things you will never truly be with them. and then theres the matter of exploitation, abuse, etc.

>>1975
precisely my point

>>1976
We!
Are!
/j/eyurizens!
We have intolerable beliefs!

>>1979
I still wanna know what you meant by "it just means making some changes"

The way u talk is way to esoteric for my retarded ass

Tf does "truly loving" even mean. Ppl make basic hooman emotions more complicated than they rlly are

*puts a toy bubble pipe in mah mouth* U see, love is inherently selfish and greedy, its not about gendrr, the only person u can truly love is yourself bc if you try to force someone else to love you thats abuse and uhhhhh if they dont love you back that makes ur love fake. Or smth idk I'm just larping philosophy here

Sometimes, people write inane things for fun

>>1982
im sorry, but i just dont think this is true. when someone loves the same sex as themselves their souls synchronize in a way that is truly impossible in cross sex relations. because cross sex relations can never reach this level of intimacy, they are a lesser form of relation and further from gods light.

>>1983
i truly miss /eh/

>>1984
Thats creepy why would i want my soul to fuse with someone elses. Oh yeah lets go on a date but first lets blend our brains 2gether

>>1985
its called being romantic

>>1984
i had a relationship with a woman who was exactly like me
i tought she was perfect
i later learned she had bpd

>>1986
If its metaphorical I could see why some1 would find it romantic but then u started talking about some god so i figured u meant literal

But also i dont find that romantic anyway. I think its more romantic to be surprised or to rib on each other. If some1 cant give me cognitiv dissonance by being annoying asfuk but also making me feel all fluffy and clingy than whats even the point of the relationship

Like someone who keeps me on my toes and were always 1-upping each other without getting butthurt abt it

>>1987
you should date her again

>>1988
im really sorry but it seems you were simply born with trash taste i guess.

>literal
i think people have to be really, really dumb to think that the literal/metaphorical distinction applies to religion, as opposed to the unity of living metaphor. but anyway.

>>1989
>you should date her again
no thanks satan

What about super sex relations?