is this squad? if the libs are actually torn apart (meaning they just dont disappear when shot) and they react to physics then itd be great, i cant remember what weapons squad has but if theres, say, a big caliber sniper you could cut someone in half and see their torso roll off a hill lmao

i meant to say limbs...

naisu kill those kuffar good OP I used to love those old alien PC games that allowed you to dismember humans and leave the bodyparts for other people to find ヽ(´ー｀)ノ gore in todays games just doesnt feel the same

>is this squad?
its stalker anomaly anon :3

i just looked it up i had no idea a mod could improve graphics to such level

just to make myself clear I only shitpost where I care

n00b like me?
it werks!

>>66284
What about moralfag?
You probably don't see it in many major archives because those threads got deleted.

>>66288
Moralfag is always used with at least some reason, people who say newf*g are just newbies trying to insult other newbies

>Moralfag is always used with at least some reason
In my experience the use without reason is fairly more common

>>66289
>>66290
I don't remember when everyone started saying Amerifag, Techfag, Britfag, Ausfag, etc... But I'm glad nobody seems to be trying to reproduce that; got a little much.

"shitposting" is a R8 word, but ur allowed to make joke articles as long as it's not malicious

>>66278
i'm sorry, can you enlighten me on how exactly shitposting is a rule8 word?

I will just quote these two posts, though I believe there was a better explanation somewhere:

>>61838
>Meaning of the term "shitposting" is unclear, so don't use it. It could either be used to refer posts everyone agrees to be shitty (which will probably break R8) or to having fun making very high-quality posts
>>64890
>it was later decided that the term "shitposting" itself was Rule 8-esque, had too many wildly varying interpretations (from "making low quality posts" to "any form of humor/joke on the internet"), and a lot of our non-imageboard-derived users had no idea what it meant

>>66279
I'm also new, but I don't remember ever reading "shitposting" until like the early-mid 2010s. It was just trolling. Being angry whilst doing it would be flaming. And trolling falls under baiting.

well, what can I say instead of shitposting? qualityposting?

not enough examples to convince it's a new thing
I feel like "x when y" memes were always a thing

They weren't always a thing

>>66250
"Me when __" is kind of like greentexts, people always think they're older than they actually are

OP's mom

>>66255
So you're fapping to his mom?

irc.rizon.net #heyuri

friendship is dead. lost to the death spiral of techno-capitalism. total sensory meltdown of the real. you will find no friends here.

むらかみてるあき？

いったいなに見た

ボクのお気に入りのーつ、他に誰か？
ありさちゃん・・・
彼女はかわいいそう子猫んだ！

このコめっちゃエロくネ？

さすがに犬でもヤレるなんて・・・

Extremely!

brown nipples...

You can still find them here https://archive.is/A9Wof (the catbox links are still up)

I should've listened to the guy telling me to use litterbox

I did warn u XD

It was allowed to stay anyway, but that change would be best

>>66247
Alright, thanks

i wish i saw that thread. maybe next year.

what dose this do
asdasd

明日 ([rp]Ashita[rp]) [/rp][/rp][rp]
test[/rp]

Quote backlinks were disabled cuz:
1. I believe they were generated server side every time a user viewed a page, slowing the site to a crawl
2. they're mostly an unnecessary nu-4chan (2010s) thing that only serves to inspire a bad culture of "baiting" and "reply whoring" (posts designed to get as many replies as possible, often by being intentionally and superficially controversial)

>>66231
Disingenous reply

>>66231
Genuous reply

If all questionable posts get a Site Discussion thread about them, it will only make sum things awkward

>>66231
Either you're really stupid or you think you're funny >>66212 was refering to words like g*m, c*al and brimst*ne which are not only used next to wojak memes but are also associated with them. (I know the words I listed specifically are usually associated with soyjak varients but you know what I mean)

>>66196
the REAL crime was watching the shitty bluray upscale of the best anime ever

MORE lolis!!

U can click a kaomoji button and then just paste it between the tags

I think teh BBCode generator needs expanding to have every possible option, especially teh AA-related ones

>Isn't there a way to make kaomojis display properly without the kao tag?
There can't possibly be such a way

>I think teh BBCode generator needs expanding to have every possible option, especially teh AA-related ones
The kao tags are already for AA-related kaomoji, it uses the same font as aa tags

lol this is getting ridiculous

>>66217
How so? It's not an actual quote, it's something that anon made up, so it's a misuse of teh quoting function, which b0rks teh rule 8

>>66217
Misusing the quote function refers to use it when your not quoting something. That guy is still quoting someone, it just so happens that those exact words were not actually said.

He is using the ">" quote marker to indicate a quote. That is proper use. It does not matter whether what he is quoting was actually said or not, it is clearly still a quote.

>>66223
>That is proper use
Not accoridng to the mods, who in the past deleted posts because what was in the greentext wasn't the exact quote
>It does not matter whether what he is quoting was actually said or not
It does matter

Im sure the mods are active enough to see people miss using quotes and delete teh posts, you guys dont need to make a half dozen threads on /q/ complaining about false positives

Greentexting, in the same thread

https://img.heyuri.net/b/koko.php?res=94097#p94144

>>66228
That guy also deleted and reposted the same thing twice before

ｷﾀ━━━(ﾟ∀ﾟ)━━━!!

もっとありますか？！～

Whitelist me kagu~nya, plox

kagy ^_^ whitelist me ^_

KAGUYA I NEED YOU TO WHITELIST THIS IP NAO

>>66203
Is that DDoS protection even still in place?

I guess, since I got a cloudflareinsight.com script running

seems like it does the job

I hate the peeking pixels! But you are right it does the job.

lol r u using internet explorer?

>>66193
firefox

test

#!/bin/bash
#stack-imgs.sh files-to-stack ..., needs imagemagick
convert "$@" -gravity center -append "stacked-output.png"

I'd be a hikkineet that probably wouldnt know how to use a computer (´～`)

>>10171
If you were born in 1994, you'd be old enough to own a computer and be online as a teen in the 2000s. It probably wouldn't be that different. Except forums were bigger and better back then and the internet was the wild west.

>>10185
see >>10047
>Earlier than the year you were born.

Sounds great, I likely wouldn't have been home schooled! My tender mind would be too occupied to wander to the perverse realms!

It's hard to say for things like these, right?
Even small changes in circumstance can lead to going down
drastically different life paths.
A whole different time period would be like shuffling everything,
then.

maybe... In my cemetery when they dig up graves they use hydraulic shovels to dig it out in a few minutes/seconds I can't imagine how long it would take with a shovel by yourself (;´Д`)

It's definitely feasible.

First, make sure there are no cameras or eyewitnesses. I assume you'll be transporting the corpse with a car or something like that, so chose a grave that's as close as possible to your car. Next, start digging. I hope you're fit, cuz you'll be digging a lot. I suggest you get some friends to help you out. Even just 2 or 3 people will make everything a lot easier.
After you've dug out the coffin, open it, get the corpse out of it, close it and dig the coffin back in. You want to leave as little traces as possible. By putting the coffin back in it'll seem like no body was stolen. I also suggest wearing gloves so that you don't leave your fingertips on the coffin and dressing with black clothes so that you're less visible. Think everything thoroughly, I'm definitely missing something so you'll have to put more thought in it than I am doing right now. And make no mistakes.

Now that your corpse is out of the grave, you'll have to transport it. Honestly, I don't really know how to help you out here ┐(ﾟ～ﾟ)┌. Depending on the stage of putrefaction or decomposition, the corpse will be quite fragile, so be careful. Maybe you can try putting it in a crudely made coffin? Or maybe a wheelbarrow. Well from this point onward you'll be on your own. ( ´ω`)

A few more tips:
1) I really, really, really suggest doing this with a friend or 2. It's too much work for a single Heyuri user. You can try anyways, but be careful.
2) To get rid of the body, burn it.

The average size of a burial plot in the United States is 8 feet long and 2.5 feet wide, and — contrary to common knowledge — are 4 feet deep, not 6 feet. The formula for volume is height times width times length, so the volume of the average gravesite would be 80 cubic feet. (8*2.5*4=80) which is approximately 3 cubic yards. (80/27 ≈ 2.963)

Of course, how fast you dig that is dependent on how compact the soil is, (which essentially boils down to how recent the body was buried) how skilled you are as a laborer, and how good your tools are, but assuming that you're going after a recently buried, loose-soiled grave, that you're a great worker, and that your shovel is of good quality, you could probably get around half a cubic yard done per hour.

If you were to work non-stop, and don't have any interruptions, then you would get done in around 6 hours. (3*0.5=6)

It's definitely possible. ヽ(´ー｀)ノ

The best way is to defile the burial so the corpse becomes a vampiric. Then it will rise from the grave by itself and revenge rape you.

>>10290
Therefore and hypothetically speaking, a team of 4 would get done in just 1.5 hours.

You better find some fellow corpsefuckers OP ヽ(´∇`)ノ