couldnt care less, show pic of Remilia instead!

>>160753
If you do not care then you shall have Flandre instead.

perfect, i don't care. thx.

>>160754
artist?

>>160754
Make a tripcode

that flandre has some good thighs

>>160797
You do not know of the great daibakuhatsu?

>>160798
No.

speaking as the one void linux user: LAAAAAMEEEE!!!!

>>160880
lameo.

>>160885
Void is really cool, I like how it can be both GNU or musl as an operating system, but the repo is tiny & slow, and the documentation is awful, and I'm not really interested in "system d sucks ullfmdjjff unix philosophy bfjfkjfjf something something bsd-like" distros

Fedora is really, really good, it comes out of the box with amazing defaults, early adoption of all the new technologies, it's stable, however it is undeniably slow - very slow, I'm talking stutters on idle slow, and the COPR takes 15 minutes to download what the AUR downloads in 30 seconds

So I'm back on Arch now, Arch with the Linux-Zen kernel is still the fastest desktop operating system I've ever used

>>160911
Good point honestly. I just picked it up for being on the smaller end for distro sizes, and found that the rest of it was pretty fun. Arch is just god damn unbeatable with the amount of stuff backing their repos... (´人｀) not to say it's not a very very good distro aside from that.

>>160911
does switching kernel to zen even make sense? i tried it for a bit a long time ago and i didn't see any difference

>>160911
>Arch is just god damn unbeatable with the amount of stuff backing their repos
You know, the concept of the AUR is fucking terrible, it's terminally unsafe for both system & security to be downloading software packaged by developers who are not the maintainers of said software - but the AUR is so goddamn fast and has so much software vs. literally anything else on the market right now that I can't be assed to consider using anything else

I really hope KDE Linux leaves alpha soon, I've been looking for a good immutable Linux distro for ages, I much prefer doing it that way and with Flatpaks so every piece of software is it's own containerised OS with no contact with the rest of the system, this way you can ensure nothing stupid happens and the system is always 100% reliable

I do think Void Linux is a genuinely good distribution though, I wish they had official support for better WMs/DEs, I don't really see a use for Xfce if I can use KDE or Niri instead

>>160914
It does make a lot of good changes to the timings with Linux, especially CPU ones, Linux in general is very high-latency, almost unbearably so, for example the audio stack, your average PulseAudio (if you still use that for whatever reason) server has 1.5-2x the latency of a clean Windows install, and Windows is considered high-latency to begin with, so stuff like Zen helps a lot, and you'll notice the difference mostly in mouse inputs in things like videogames and apps like DaVinci Resolve

afaik macOS/BSD is as good as it gets

>>160925
Though it has to be said if you're using Linux as a general computer, for common tasks like web browsing, music listening, drawing, some office work, you should always be using the hardened kernel, preferably in a distro like Secureblue Linux or Fedora Atomic Sway

Oh what a coincidence, I installed ArchLinux recently as well. It's on an old computer because I don't want to do it on my main one just yet. I need to make sure there won't be any issues. Also I need to figure what profile I want to use.

KDE Plasma is popular but I find it's got too much rich features (which is what its known for) so I need to find out what the other ones look like.

I can't seem to get any good results, when searching "Archlinux profiles" only the Ai prompt ever seems to know what I want. (It's quite a pattern with all my internet searches.)

>>161031
>KDE Plasma is popular but I find it's got too much rich features (which is what its known for) so I need to find out what the other ones look like

GNOME. GNOME has less features, and to be honest I don't think anyone should bother using any desktop environment outside of KDE/GNOME, window managers are cool but for your "efficiency gains" you have to edit a text file everytime you want to customize something, there are desktop shells like Noctalia or DMS but they don't do more than 1/3 or what a traditional DE does

>>161257
And you need to download the source code, know how to write code, have a decent understanding of how it works and then compile the DE every time you want to customize GNOME.