[Home] [Catalog] [Search] [Inbox] [Write PM] [Admin]
[Return]

Posting mode: Reply

(for deletion)
  • Allowed file types are: gif, jpg, jpeg, png, bmp, swf, webm, mp4
  • Maximum file size allowed is 50000 KB.
  • Images greater than 200 * 200 pixels will be thumbnailed.



Bunkasai has started!


File: Screenshot_20251101_135937.png
(2385 KB, 3841x2161)[ImgOps]
2385 KB
while you were arguing on the internet, I installed Fedora Linux 43! :unsure:

and then I jacked my PENIS off to Remilia Scarlet :biggrin:
>>
couldnt care less, show pic of Remilia instead! :x3:
>>
>>160753
If you do not care then you shall have Flandre instead.
>>
perfect, i don't care. thx. :biggrin:
>>
>>160754
artist?
>>
>>160754
Make a tripcode
>>
that flandre has some good thighs :love:
>>
>>160797
You do not know of the great daibakuhatsu?

>>160798
No.
>>
speaking as the one void linux user: LAAAAAMEEEE!!!!

>>160880
lameo.
>>
File: Untitled4_20251102182623.png
(4435 KB, 3840x2160)[ImgOps]
4435 KB
>>160885
Void is really cool, I like how it can be both GNU or musl as an operating system, but the repo is tiny & slow, and the documentation is awful, and I'm not really interested in "system d sucks ullfmdjjff unix philosophy bfjfkjfjf something something bsd-like" distros

Fedora is really, really good, it comes out of the box with amazing defaults, early adoption of all the new technologies, it's stable, however it is undeniably slow - very slow, I'm talking stutters on idle slow, and the COPR takes 15 minutes to download what the AUR downloads in 30 seconds

So I'm back on Arch now, Arch with the Linux-Zen kernel is still the fastest desktop operating system I've ever used
>>
>>160911
Good point honestly. I just picked it up for being on the smaller end for distro sizes, and found that the rest of it was pretty fun. Arch is just god damn unbeatable with the amount of stuff backing their repos... (´人`) not to say it's not a very very good distro aside from that.
>>
>>160911
does switching kernel to zen even make sense? i tried it for a bit a long time ago and i didn't see any difference
>>
>>160911
>Arch is just god damn unbeatable with the amount of stuff backing their repos
You know, the concept of the AUR is fucking terrible, it's terminally unsafe for both system & security to be downloading software packaged by developers who are not the maintainers of said software - but the AUR is so goddamn fast and has so much software vs. literally anything else on the market right now that I can't be assed to consider using anything else

I really hope KDE Linux leaves alpha soon, I've been looking for a good immutable Linux distro for ages, I much prefer doing it that way and with Flatpaks so every piece of software is it's own containerised OS with no contact with the rest of the system, this way you can ensure nothing stupid happens and the system is always 100% reliable

I do think Void Linux is a genuinely good distribution though, I wish they had official support for better WMs/DEs, I don't really see a use for Xfce if I can use KDE or Niri instead

>>160914
It does make a lot of good changes to the timings with Linux, especially CPU ones, Linux in general is very high-latency, almost unbearably so, for example the audio stack, your average PulseAudio (if you still use that for whatever reason) server has 1.5-2x the latency of a clean Windows install, and Windows is considered high-latency to begin with, so stuff like Zen helps a lot, and you'll notice the difference mostly in mouse inputs in things like videogames and apps like DaVinci Resolve

afaik macOS/BSD is as good as it gets
>>
>>160925
Though it has to be said if you're using Linux as a general computer, for common tasks like web browsing, music listening, drawing, some office work, you should always be using the hardened kernel, preferably in a distro like Secureblue Linux or Fedora Atomic Sway


Delete post: []