[Home] [Catalog] [Search] [Inbox] [Write PM] [Admin]
[Return]

Posting mode: Reply

(for deletion, 8 chars max)
  • Allowed file types are: gif, jpg, jpeg, png, bmp, swf, webm, mp4
  • Maximum file size allowed is 50000 KB.
  • Images greater than 200 * 200 pixels will be thumbnailed.



We will hold the 12th Townhall next Saturday (5th) 19:00 UTC [Info] [Countdown]


File: mpv-shot0078.jpg
(148 KB, 1920x1072)[ImgOps]
148 KB
are all lolicons emotionally underdeveloped schizophrenics or just the 2D lovers?
Marked for deletion (Old)
>>
I'm sad now because the OP image made me think of a pretty depressing loli doujin. :sad:
>>
File: 0050.png
(1314 KB, 1055x1500)[ImgOps]
1314 KB
Both! :biggrin:
>>146388
orz
>>
Which emotions do you think lolicons are lacking development in? Also I don't see an abnormally high percentage of lolicons exhibiting schizophrenic behavior.
>>
I'm a PEDOPHILE :kuma6: not a lolicon. Therefore I am of sound mind.
>>
>>146400
The ability to accept reality and reject forbidden fantasies maybe?
>>
>>146388
was it of a cute loli being beat and had cockroaches stuffed in her and then put in a duffle bag?
>>
>>146411
The reality is that girls hit puberty at around age 10 and men are naturally attracted to pubescent girls, and prefer girls who are still virgins especially when seeking a monogamous relationship/marriage. Rejecting things because they're forbidden just makes you a pussy. If everyone did that nothing would ever change. Everyone would still believe the earth is flat and if you sail too far you'll fall off the edge, you'll die if you eat a tomato, diseases are caused by bad smells and not praying hard enough etc.
>>
So you even know what schizophrenia is?
>>
>>146455
why are you talking to yourself?
>>
>>146443
We live in a society. You mean nothing. (if you don't already have money and power) If you insist, then your place is either under the bridge, in prison or in a medical institution. Every religion first of all regulates sexual behavior of the congregation. Religion of atheism is no exception.
>>
>>146519
Living in a society doesn't mean you need to waste your life on your knees sucking society's dick, unless you're a gay masochist that enjoys living like a slave I guess. People have been doing illegal things for all of history and will continue to do so for the foreseeable future. Also wealth and power =/= happiness. Look how many rich and powerful people are on anti-depressants and hard drugs, and how many commit suicide. You can live in a tent under a bridge and be happier than that.
>>
Men in general mean nothing too. No one cares what you want or feel. People will feel sorry for a dog, but not you. Society is feminist. You are resource, disposable sex. A bio robot, that support the functioning of the system. The robot must function properly or be disassembled.
>>
>>146532
...what? :nosebleed:
>>
>>146537
>nosebleed
..what?
>>
The development of this thread seems to indicate that OP is right.
>>
65 KB
>>146543
That schizophrenic conspiracy theory post was so retarded it started reading like femdom literature, and I had to stop myself from imagining myself as a disposable sex bio-robot being handled by women for procreating purposes.

And my nose started bleeding.
>>
>>146443
Men are naturally attracted to pubescent girls, you say?

I like to call this one 'appellare falsam naturam' (lit. Appeal to False Nature), it's not a real thing, it's just a common fallacy I see a lot of people fall into.

It is the trait of people utilizing concepts of "natural behaviour" to attempt to rationalise otherwise animalistic or barbaric actions, it implies that humans, have some sort of "instinct" and must not ignore their inner biological animal brain to conform to otherwise societal constructs or just straight up basic human decencies.

Examples often include:
° our ancestors ate raw meat, so you should do the same for health
° you should be allowed to murder someone to rape their spouse, this is how the alphas do it in nature
° men are naturally attracted to someone once they hit puberty, because of teh "pheromones", so you should seek sexual relations with someone who would still cry if you told them they were a 'meanie-pants' - and don't ask why your 12-year old wife can't give birth and keeps having miscarriages, silly, thats your fault! Don't know you The Puberty™ already magically makes a child's body capable of procreation?

N-no wait please don't look at the data :astonish:
>>
852 KB
>>146532
Not so, but I wish that were the case.
>>
>>146558
>>146563
Robots are for work, not for procreation, you bakas. You'll live alone and work.
>>
516 KB
>>146564
Not that I consider myself worthy of procreating, but if no one procreates then you'll run out of women and robots to serve them.

Also surely it is the duty of a robot to perform oral sex on its mistress at least.
>>
>>146561
Everyone would be much happier if alphas killed all the weak males and "raped" their wives though.
>with someone who would still cry if you told them they were a 'meanie-pants'
That describes the vast majority of adult western women if you replace "meanie-pants" with something like "no, a $700 purse is a waste of money".
>procreation
Sex isn't just for procreation, it's also for pleasure and pair bonding. Obviously you should wait a few years until your 12 year old wife's body has matured at 15 or 16 before impregnating her, and until then you can use contraceptives or pull out and spray it all over her.
>pheromones
I get raging hard-ons from just looking at pics of lolis but now that you mention it I'm sure smelling their pheromones would make me even hornier.

My argument wasn't so much "you should do whatever is natural because it's natural" but that you should do what you want instead of what society wants you to do.
>>
>>146580
OP, we have found the answer to your question!

Emotionally underdeveloped schizophrenics :biggrin:
>>
You anons seem like a good sample to ask as any.


Suppose you enjoy eating a flavor of ice cream (vanilla, chocolate, strawberry). Initially, it is perfectly acceptable in the local society/community you happen to live in. One day, for a reason incomprehensible, it is no longer allowed to eat ice cream in public and in private. The reason given is "culturally offensive and disagrees with the traditional values we hold". They pass several criminal laws covering ice cream and its consumption.

You currently live within the area of this community, but you don't hold any attachment to specific groups or individuals in this community. You also don't particular care about what they consider important or their values.

Within a week, ice cream can no longer be bought or sold anywhere near where you live.

One day, a strange man knocks on your door and offers a deal: you will get a near-infinite supply of ice cream to eat. A special condition is that, although the community you live in is able to shame and insult you, they are unable to permanently remove your supply and any attempts to criminally charge you are guaranteed to fail. He also gives you a different location to stay at so you don't get firebombed while sleeping. In exchange, the man asks to be allowed to raze and incinerate the area enclosing the society you used to live in, along with any people still living there. He promises to only do this after your life ends.

Would you take his offer? Are you able to comprehend why someone might take up or refuse his offer, even if you may not agree? Type your answer before revealing the spoiler.

Suppose "eating ice cream" was replaced with "fapping to lolis and shotas". Does your answer change? You might say 2D is not 3D, but my actual question is: would you choose to do what makes you happy, even if it goes against what the other humans say? Does this answer change depending on whether you find those humans pleasant and enjoyable to be around, or insufferable and a nuisance to your life? Does "meaning, legacy, the past and future, how other people will remember you in the future, the continued existence of the human species" hold any importance to you and you alone?


I have no idea where I was going with this :unsure:. I lost the plot about halfway through.
>>
>>146583
If they're underdeveloped, it means lolis would be perfect pair for them to spend time together :wink:
>>
not reading all of this thread.
the only "schizophrenic" is you op. i am sure its obvious due to history and nature of things that when women are of age to get pregnet and give birth is when its okay. prepubescent girls are not.

some people are attracted and want women who would be good mothers and that includes having weight and big fully developed boobs so there offspring get full nutrients and mother would not die at birth. skinny small girls would be awful for raising a kid until older.

most importantly if you do want some of age 11 year old you would have to go through the father and get his consent too. as really (and this is for adults too) marriage of a women is the transfer of women from father to husband. as really women left unattended most likely leads to bad (see any fatherless women)

sex with girl of age to get pregnet is fine. its really moral standpoint, go complain about your beliefs to government and get laws changed. i believe prepubescent sex should be illegal and that if girl can give birth then its legal so long as you have the girl's and the father's consent.
>>
>>146586
Lolis are surströmming.
>>
File: 1738347566971646.png
(666 KB, 717x707)[ImgOps]
666 KB
>>146561
here's the data faggot
also raw meat is good for you and earth is flat.
>>
>>146588
breast size has absolutely nothing to do with child-raising though, they don't hold more milk or nutrients, it's fatty tissue that makes some breasts bigger than others - glandular tissue is what keeps the baby alive.
>>
>>146561
>our ancestors ate raw meat, so you should do the same for health
the japs still eat raw fish and they're healthier than just about every group of people that don't eat raw fish


Delete post: []