its whatever? ┐(ﾟ～ﾟ)┌

naisu sirowanpi

This implies that this isnt garbage, it is garbage.

>>144219
How can you say this? It is image of a loli! If she were real I want to have her on my lap! Your arguments?

she was not drawn by a real person instead generated by one without love for the art.

"she was not drawn by a real person"
"Real person" was doing work of translating some of the ideas to prompt, then selecting good variations.

"one without love for the art"
False assumptions here.

Computer-generated animu girls are just animu girls. I love how AI sees the world and glitches, this reverse compvision is more cyberpunk than 3DCG, but hated ┐(ﾟ～ﾟ)┌.

>>144219
I wouldn't be able to tell OP's image is AI right away. Only thing that gives it away is the detail on teh shoes.

There's definitely a point to be made about AI being bad because it scrapes training data without the consent of the original artists, and then people making prompts say "[image description] in the style of [artist]". It's plagiarism really. But if it makes my PENIS hard, am I really going to be thinking about that?[/artist]

>>144227
Wait, heyuri automatically added at teh end of my post thinking it was BBCode? I didn't know it did that. That's convenient to know.

test test

>>144228
it should be limited to the list of known/legal tags (´～`)

>>144227
>Only thing that gives it away is the detail on teh shoes.
subtle errors on the palm and fingernail there is also the eyes, eyelashes and the small yellow spot between her armpit and breast

>Wait, heyuri automatically added at teh end of my post thinking it was BBCode?
It's a known bug that has since been fixed for teh upcoming️ overhaul

Generating retarded slop like this is a guilty pleasure of mine...

ｷﾀ━━━(ﾟ∀ﾟ)━━━!!

this has one pretty big flaw but it could be difficult to spot

OP, I agree with you: I have seen amazing stuff be done with diffusion models. That being said, I get the impression that a lot of the stuff posted on the internet isn't very well made (not just limited to AI images, before this it would've been stuff on deviantart or furaffinity), probably because of user inexperience with the technology or lack of care. One of the major differences I've noticed is that barrier to entry and time investment required to make AI stuff of any quality is much lower than a lot of other mediums, causing a large number of (for lack of a better word) "slop" content on a lot of websites.

I guess people get frustrated when a lot of posts they end up finding don't appeal to them. That's not to say that what they like is "good" and what they don't is "garbage", but more that they don't have an easy way of sorting out what they like from what they don't.

The closest analogy I can think of would be if stuff from Gacha Club or Gaia Online was posted everywhere on the internet.

I'm rambling on, but I'm still not sure how I feel on this.

>>144226
>one without love for the art
I do wonder, how does someone measure whether the person behind the image has "love for the art"? I guess a simple way would be to check the level of care put into minor details, but that might be confounded by skill level, time investment or artistic intent.

A better question is, does "love for the art" matter? If an artist draws a happy loli or something, do they show a love for art (whatever that may be) or a love for the idea and subject matter (the loli)? Is there a meaningful difference between the two? Does the audience feel differently on this matter than the artist, and does that matter?

What do you think, anons?

>>144239
I'm thinking of getting something to run a local instance of Stable Diffusion (or whatever other image generation program is available). Any tips on hardware requirements? I don't know if a GPU is required, or if you can get by with just a CPU and integrated graphics. Also no idea on RAM or storage (though I have heard you need 10-100 GB at least?). Don't want to spend too much, and I don't have a gaming PC currently.

>>144247
The thumb being hidden behind her hand isn't a flaw, it's the pillow. I guess it could just be a lumpy broken-in pillow but AI does this shit constantly with stuff in the background.

like how the tiles behind this loli don't line up at all for example

>>144255
>>144257
Is this fixable by generating the background and character separately, and then photoshopping them together?

>>144255
her arm is pressing on the pillow and it makes concave

>>144258
yes but is there any AI artist who isn't too lazy to do that?

>>144244
umm... she's as big as the entire bed?

>>144244
so no one has any idea what's wrong with this image?

>>144244
she's wearing clothes

>>144733
It was the pillow. This image however is flawless and worthy of being in one of the world's most prestigious fine art museums.

>>144793
That's not where the piss comes out of, slopper. The female pisshole's up higher than that. Try harder.

>>144797
if she's been stretched out by 500 dicks maybe, but if she's still tight it should look more like this

the lemonade fountain being a couple millimeters higher looks nice too though

>Amateur close up pee 2765668 renrag.mp4
yet another reason I love my PENIS earned!