Off-Topic@Heyuri

Gaming experiences are highly personal - there's a vast number of wildly different genres, and it's easy for people to get pissed off if they find a game too easy/hard, boring, time-wasting, too expensive, buggy, falsely-advertised, etc.

There's also teh fact that games often appeal to inherently competitive people, as well as those who aren't the greatest at socializing with others

yuo are sounding like such a gamecube fanboy baby right now. did you poopoo your diaper?

heh...

(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)

i would love vidya board here. i think heyurizens wouldnt be tight assed about gaemu

barring obvious exceptions like politics and religion, the only time I see people get more personally invested than game discussion is when they're talking about technology
the sheer fucking holy wars about incredibly minor stack differences I've seen on 4/g/ have been worse than anything I've seen on 4/v/, and this isn't atypical for other places I've been

still, games just attract a younger, less level headed crowd that does immature shit
and that's life

but yeah, I can solidly say tech posting ends up being angrier than games lul, even if game talk is more immature

Overly competitive, immature, and usually broke (due to being underage b& or just turboNEETs) so they can't afford more than one current gen system. Also don't forget everyone's favorite, autism.

can you define "lowest quality content"

>>140294
lowest quality content = things you like

best and most sophisticated content = things I like

the gaming space is just toxic. i don't mean that in some lame way that people use the term toxic. i tend to just watch youtube and stream vods of positive people who don't focus on shitting on things. i just enjoy video games and engage with content that is also positive about the games i enjoy. i don't go out of my way to hate on the bad games or shit on the industry. i'm not a toxic positivity guy, i just engage with the good stuff. which is mostly indie games these days.