Girl with bouquet, 1893, by William-Adolphe Bouguereau.

Egyptian Modesty by Charles Gleyre

ｷﾀ━━━(ﾟ∀ﾟ)━━━!!

Allison Kendall 1918 painted by her father William Sargeant Kendall.

>>129200
So beautiful, she looks like Mathilda Lando.

Also, I'm thinking of a painting but I can't remember the name of it. As I recall it was neoclassical in style, excellent anatomy, shading, detail, etc. similar to Jean Leon Gerome, orientalist themed, from the late 19th to early 20th century. It's a painting of a girl who looks about 5 years old, totally naked atop a temple in pre-Christian Egypt or Mesopotamia, and she's a pagan priestess doing some sort of ritual.

I searched for like an hour last night to no avail, does anyone know?

ｷﾀ━━━(ﾟ∀ﾟ)━━━!!

Daughter; Egyptian, Old Kingdom, Dynasty 5, 2465–2323 B.C.

>>129239
4000 years old loli!

>>129204
Frilly dress and a silly hat. Must be a Touhou character

>>129239
Why is she so small? I know she's a child, but she's way too small in comparison to her parent's legs. Not that I'm complaining, I could fuck her even if she was THAT small, but still

Artists in the west didn't really know how to depict children until the Renaissance. They basically just made them look like tiny adults instead of realizing the differences in proportions and neotenous features.

Some old black and white photos of little girls.

ｷﾀ━━━(ﾟ∀ﾟ)━━━!!

ｷﾀ━━━(ﾟ∀ﾟ)━━━!!

>>129506

An absolute gold mine yeah that is where i found most of these.

>>129506
wikimedia should really upgrade their wiki software to have galleries with tags like the rest of the internet has been doing for decades, that cascading categories shit is just retarded especially when most of the categories are empty

>>129506
Eroi

ｷﾀ━━━(ﾟ∀ﾟ)━━━!!

ｷﾀ━━━(ﾟ∀ﾟ)━━━!!

>>129511
are they having sex?

>>129506
this is the first image I came across while serching 4 faps
>A boy from village Blahovishchenka (Zaporizhzhia gubernia, Ukraine) - Ilarion Nyshchenko - from starvation killed his 3 year old brother and ate him (1921-1922)
not what I was hoping for but I'll accept the challenge...

>>129515
Vintage yuri...

>>129550
Artist: Joseph Stalin
Groups: Holodomor
Tags: yaoi, incest, cannibalism

are photos of naked children legal if they're in black and white or something?

>>129570
in the US at least, artistic nudity is protected speech under the first amendment, and the images would need to fail the criteria found in United States v. Dost to not be protected

the test is generally kind of shitty and there are a lot of images that historically would not have fallen afoul of obscenity charges that might fail the test

as a side note, it really is some shit - obscenity shouldn't exist as a concept (a CP ruling is independent of an obscenity one too, so you can remove the concept without stopping the law's ability to prosecute CP) and the Dost criteria are basically just the judicial system acting legislatively

>>129570
it's not actually porn, which is part of the reason

>>129572
>>129573
does that mean that photos from "child modeling studios" are legal in the us?

>>129574

Those are more of a grey area similar to lolicon.

ｷﾀ━━━(ﾟ∀ﾟ)━━━!!

>>129574
>>129575
No, people have been prosecuted in the US for producing NN content. My understanding is that any photographic/videographic material can be labelled CP if a judge is persuaded by the prosecution that it fits the definition. There have been times people have been arrested for artistic materials and the judge ruled that it wasn't CP though.

It's (probably) illegal everywhere that actual CP is illegal, even Japan. That's the sole reason CandyDoll shut down. It had been legal until Japanese law was amended. Moecco is still in print, the newer junior idol gravure being a lot lot tamer than it used to be, though I would think it still fits the revised definition of CP. So I think it's just not being strictly enforced.

>>129686

The definition of CP is so vague lol.

how do you guys get so knowledgeable without your door getting broken down?

>>129686
instagram is filled with cp in that case

Taking naked or partially naked pics of kids used to be normal, since underage nudity wasn't considered erotic. Even Lewis Carroll took such photos

>>129716
you say that as if he wasn't a pedo

>>129723
He wasn't, it's a common misconception

>>129727

And you know this how?

Did you know the man?

>>129760
Calling Carroll a pedophile for the naked kid paintings he had would be like calling a modern day old lady with naked cherub paintings in her house a pedophile. TECHNICALLY those look like naked babies but the painting is meant to represent purity instead of lewdness. Many contemporaries among his time had similar paintings, and nobody from back then would've found them out of the ordinary.

Someone who has lived with very young children will know that they're naked a large amount of the time. Paintings back then often tried to reflect that period of youthful innocence.

Caroll being a pedo is a clickbait rumor, it sounds scandalous for the creator of Alice in Wonderland to be a pedo so that's what people say. But if you look into this shit you'll find it was a norm to have paintings like that and saying they were lewd back then would be seen as absurd and just indicative of your own issues.

>>129777
I think it's also because he really liked making friends with female children.

>>129727
i've been a fan of him and his work for a couple of decades and i'm telling you he was a pedo

>>129700
Join the police force and use your knowledge for good

victorians are known for their affinity to naked children in art.