all a / b / c / f / h / jp / l / o / q / s / sw / lounge cgi up wiki
[Home] [Catalog] [Search] [Inbox] [Write PM] [Admin]
[Return]

Posting mode: Reply
(for deletion, 8 chars max)
  • Allowed file types are: gif, jpg, jpeg, png, bmp, swf, webm, mp4
  • Maximum file size allowed is 50000 KB.
  • Images greater than 200 * 200 pixels will be thumbnailed.
We will hold the 12th Townhall next Saturday (5th) 19:00 UTC [Info] [Countdown]
File: world_trade_center.png
(950 KB, 725x550)[ImgOps]
950 KB
No.111102
do you prefer the original architecture of the world trade center or the new architecture of the world trade center
Marked for deletion (Old)
>>
No.111103
File: Big Apple 1930s.jpg
(6758 KB, 5359x3779)[ImgOps]
6758 KB
I prefer the Old New York architecture
>>
No.111104
i liek the one with the plane decoration (・∀・)
>>
No.111226
The old one is better. I don't get why they had to downgrade it like that. （ ´,_ゝ`）
>>
No.111228
Ah... plane-chan... don't violate my architecture...
>>
No.111229
new one looks like any other skyscaper, teh old was twin thus did stand out more
>>
No.111377
>>111226
while i am not a huge fan of the new design i am happy that it is at least consistant with the design of the other buildings (3/4/7). the original was all over the place. from the short stubby black boxes at the bottom (4/5/6) to the out of place 7 wtc and the kinda ugly marriott hotel it was kinda all over the place.
>>
No.111379
>>111102
the original is significantly more iconic, and having two of them is cooler
but the new one genuinely just looks better
>>
No.112091
I like the minimalism of the old ones, the new one is too flashy.
It is a cool contrast between super minimal design and big huge buildings, it is a powerful symbol with straight ninety degree angels and plain colours, but it just werks somehow. Also it just encapsulates a time and a place, the design just screams 80s American office culture whereas the new one could be in Dubai, Shanghai, London or any city with tall buildings.
Delete post: []