all a / b / c / f / h / j / jp / l / o / q / s / sw / lounge cgi up wiki
[Settings] [Home] [Catalog] [Search] [Private messages] [Admin]
[Return] [Bottom]

Posting mode: Reply
Tegaki
Emotes
Kaomoji
Emoji
BBCode
(for deletion)
  • Allowed file types are: gif, jpg, jpeg, png, bmp, swf, webm, mp4
  • Maximum file size allowed is 50000 KB.
  • Images greater than 200 * 200 pixels will be thumbnailed.
  • 23 unique users in the last 10 minutes (including lurkers)
Want your banner here? Click here to submit yours!
File: image smol.png
[Spoiler](5.37 MB, 3840x1857) ▶
5629262
No.181376 + AS
▶
i dont like it when artists draw otokonoko with large PENISes, so i edited it smaller
i feel like otokonoko should have small ones because uke
>>
No.181377 +
▶
File: image.png
[Spoiler](7.7 MB, 4096x1981) ▶
8075198
this was the original image
clearly far too large for an otokonoko
>>
No.181378 +
▶
File: 7a4e8e85190be2c3a88a9c3b56259e47.png
[Spoiler](4.89 MB, 2431x3000) ▶
5123638
i like it when artists draw otokonoko with large PENISes
it makes it hotter when a hung bottom bitch boy is getting dominated and having the only masculine part of himself uselessly flopping around ( ´ω`)
>>
No.181379 +
▶
>>181378
this is satanic and against gods will
otokonoko should be small and uninterested in using their PENISes
>>
No.181384 +
▶
>>181379
i find your lack of DFC disturbing
>>
No.181406 +
▶
>>181384
DFC on a boy is good and all but ive yet to hear objections so its one more for the curves for now
>>
No.181417 +
▶
post more otokonoko I love PENIS ヽ(´∇`)ノ
>>
No.181418 Yeah x1
▶
that's not otokonoko tho. look at these tits. futas with big cocks are hot
>>
No.181432 +
▶
File: 20240716_173254.jpg
[Spoiler](87 KB, 1096x1440) ▶
89758
>>181418
im told its not futa without a VAGINA

>>181417
>>
No.181562 +
▶
>im told its not futa without a VAGINA
so pedantic. fine dickgirl
>>
No.181608 +
▶
File: 116519863_p0.png
[Spoiler](2.86 MB, 1674x2495) ▶
2993720
>>181562
hey, its not my fault that anons in certain other places got all autismy over this distinction over the years. personally i think they all tend to blend together into a continuum of feminine male thing.
>>
No.181615 +
▶
>>181608
I am autismo about it. i don't want traps to have tits. they should be flat. flat girls with dicks.
>>
No.181618 +
▶
File: 8b6308c865e7339c37280a79b25f4172.jpg
[Spoiler](191 KB, 1698x2200) ▶
195621
>>181615
i empathise, its a common want and smooth girl (male) chests are quite nice. time however has moved us in strange directions, and the art styles that cater to the femboy era trap ideal of neoteny do not please me in my advanced age (early thirties). powfoo does not draw like he used to. everything is pojuified.
>>
No.181624 +
▶
>>181615
a flat girl with a dick would still not be a trap, it just be a loli dickgirl, no?
traps are boys
>>
No.181628 +
▶
>>181624
i think anon is being playful with his definition of girl.
>>
No.181631 +
▶
File: turisasu.png
[Spoiler](5.14 MB, 2508x3541) ▶
5390832
>>181624
what's the difference?
I am into otokonoko who are very feminine
draw a girl, call it a boy
>>
No.181655 +
▶
>>181631
turisasu is the best otokonoko artist
>>
No.181677 +
▶
>>181624
And not every flat girl is loli. (￣ー￣)
>>
No.181689 +
▶
>>181631
that's exactly the difference, its draw a girl (except for the PENIS), call it a boy. Not draw a girl call it a girl.
Want your banner here? Click here to submit yours!
[Top]
Delete post: []
First
[1]
Last