>>187547
>Proof? Share holders don't care about programming languages and there's no profit incentive to memory safety.
Microsoft is actively shilling rust for „memory safe drivers” and guess who's in the linux foundation board? Obviously „memory safety” is a popular buzzword and it's going to penetrate the wallets of clueless corporate suits so of course there's a profit incentive. The only reason why linux has rust in the kernel is so microsoft can market their azure servers as „modern, secure, memory safe infrastructure”.

>Which programs *do*? Nothing works properly on BSD. Not Krita, not Davinci Resolve, not Ardour.
https://cgit.freebsd.org/ports/tree/audio/ardour
https://cgit.freebsd.org/ports/tree/graphics/krita

Ever tried leaving the first page of /g/?

>Davinci Resolve
That garbage doesn't even work on linux properly lmao. Also you need to work on your reading comprehension skills because I've said that proprietary trash doesn't count.

>is there such a thing as a non-good Linux desktop stack? Haven't seen one yet.
Yes, all of them. GTK, QT, dbus and polkit are horrible bloated corporate insecure cancer and anything based on it is garbage by default. Especially desktop environments like GNOME and KDE.

>wrong guy
My apolocheese ᘛ⁐̤ᕐᐷ