>>187439
"They use it because that's what the shareholders wanted." Proof? Share holders don't care about programming languages and there's no profit incentive to memory safety.

"Which programs don't work on BSD's that work on linux?" Which programs *do*? Nothing works properly on BSD. Not Krita, not Davinci Resolve, not Ardour.


>>187489
"Implying that linux contributors have ever made a good desktop stack" is there such a thing as a non-good Linux desktop stack? Haven't seen one yet.

"If you're this bad at shilling garbage to people then maybe you should reconsider working in marketing and real estate" wrong guy