>>187315
>To be a functional, aswell as a reliable open source kernel,
Is that why they're using rust in the kernel? Existing contributors having to learn a new meme language and juggle between them because corporate shareholders funding linux astroturf it to hell and back is „reliable” and „functional”?

Please elaborate on how did you come to the conclusion of that being linux's goal.

For an example OpenBSD's main goal is to be the most secure operating system possible no matter how many sacrifices must be made to achieve that.

NetBSD's main goal is to be the most portable and backwards compatible operating system possible and available on any machine no matter how obscure or unique.

Those are distinct and unique goals that are attributed to those operating systems. If you think about OpenBSD you think „security”. If you think about NetBSD you think „portability”. You can verify that those things are true by observing their websites and the way the operating systems work.

On the other hand if you think about linux you either think about an unwashed homeless man with a laptop on a garbage bin programming, a penguin or a bunch of low functioning autists acting like pretentious faggots who think they have unearthed ancient wisdom by copy-pasting commands from the arch wiki.

>BSD has been out for years and we have yet to be graced by the legendary BSD machine
The legendary BSD machine is sitting in my bedroom. It's called the „Build it Yourself, Faggot” machine.

>Firefox "gecko" port for FreeBSD is limited to working on two CPU architectures
Most people aren't watching youtube on powerpc or arm embedded micro controllers. Also fedora linux, the distro you've claimed is good isn't much better in that regard so I don't know what's your fucking point.

>most DRM content does not load
/usr/ports/net-p2p/qbittorrent-5.2.3

>I wouldn't call BSD capable of truly browsing the web
Of course it isn't. BSD Unix is from 1978, before the world wide web. FreeBSD on the other hand works fine.

>One thing BSD is really good at is networking
Correct, we use ifconfig instead of ass rape supplicant.

>but due to BSD's horrible cuckold permissive license,
Why are gnutards always thinking about extreme sexual fetishes? Is that why you're always so angry? Are you sexually frustrated that you can't watch DRM cuckold nigger porn on FreeBSD?

>this has allowed megacorporations to develop far more advanced closed-source software off of BSD's work without having to give back!
You should be grateful for that. Most government computers use windows, imagine the human suffering if microsoft had to design a fucking TCP/IP stack.

Also, corporations are parasitic. Copyleft GPL license invites and allows bureaucratic vermin to insert themselves into a project and make decisions that benefit them the most which do not align with what the community wants because GPL itself is bureaucratic mental illness.

>BSD is pretty much the perfect tool to kill FOSS,
BSD is indemnifying a project from corporate bullying. Also are you even trying to not sound like a fed or does mossad not pay you enough?

>it's designed from the ground up to turn everyone's hard work into easily stealable code :)
Code is not intellectual property, you can't „steal” code. Also it's not like corporations have to follow the law anyway, nobody gives a shit if you „steal” GPL code unless it's funded by DoD like GN*ME.

>I was mostly asking why the ever loving fuck would anyone mention a distribution called "LXLE"
Hope picrel helps.