[Settings] [Home] [Contact] [Catalog] [Search] [Thread list] [Report] [Watcher] [PMs] [Admin]
[Return]

Report a post

Preview
Threads can be autosaged when they seem to have fulfilled their purpose with noone replying to OP, but they serve to users bantering at each other instead

The first deleted post in that thread is a bit /pol/-ish but not really R7, and the second one (reply to it) was really posted just to get a rise out of the users unless it was ironic? I thought that at first, but seems waffle and chikin is something people actually eat together, WTF? and that's basically Rule 8.d
Either way it succeeded and attracted a user who has been previous ban records for Rule 7, there on wasn't really fitting to Heyuri.

Thanks for caring enough to create a thread anyways!

>>69544
I don't feel like making political posts about current political stuff is really R7. With one unrelated exception, it's irrelevant if same topics are happening to be discussed on 4chan as well.
That said I can also understand we don't live in an utopia where we can comfortably just allow all political discussions, those who think Heyuri is the perfect place to boldly state their controversial views hardly mind R8.d after exchanging a few posts in practice. It was brought up last townhall if we should enforce R7 stricter and the response was mixed too.
Post number No.69545
Board Site Discussion@Heyuri
Optional. Describe what's wrong with it.