all
a
/
b
/
c
/
f
/
h
/
j
/
jp
/
l
/
o
/
q
/
s
/
sw
/
lounge
cgi
up
wiki
Heyuri!
Bulletin Boards
2D Cute
2D Ero
2D Lolikon
3D Girls
Anime/Manga
Flash
Girl Talk
日本語/Japan
Lounge
Oekaki
Off-Topic
Site Discussion
Strange World
Overboard
Heyuri★CGI
Heyuri★CGI
@PartyII
Battle Royale R
Chat
Chinsouki★
Dating
DevChat
Drama Club
Hakoniwa Islands PvE
Hakoniwa Islands PvP
Polls
Slime Breeder
Web Banana
Web Shiritori
Yumemiru Gambler
Kakiko Checker
Other
Anime Nominations
Banners
Cytube
Heyuri Calendar
Heyuri Wiki
MAL Club
Museum
Steam Group
Uploader
[
Settings
]
[
Home
] [
Contact
] [
Catalog
] [
Search
] [
Thread list
] [
Stats
] [
Reports
] [
Watcher
] [
PMs
] [
Admin
]
Site Discussion@Heyuri
it's the place to be!
[
Return
]
Report a post
Preview
Anonymous
## Mod
2025/08/24
(Sun)
00:53:37
ID:MODERATOR
No.
69219
[
Report
]
▶
>Let's say someone writes a good post, but in that post they describe something as "based". While the post would likely not be banned, using that word in such a situation would still be discourage and I doubt what would be going through the mods' minds is "since this user does not use this word in a low effort and annoying way, I do not think that the user switching to some other positive adjective would be preferable in any way"
Posts like that always get a warning unless they're one of the known regular rule breakers - either publicly as a reply or privately via the warning function
From there, the outcome is largely determined by their reaction. An "oops my bad, won't do that again" means we don't have to do anything else since the situation is already resolved; a "lmao this site is rulecucked" on the other hand will result in an actual ban since it's obvious they have no intention of following the rules, and then the usual game of ban-evasion whack-a-mole will commence
>Similarly, if a user made a picture where characters would be edited into people of the photo, and one of the people was given a wojak face, even if the wojak wasn't supposed to be some annoying comment on how the person in the picture was "soying out" or something, such a picture would still be looked down upon.
If it was the "classic" Wojak (as it was used before the whole thing became extremely stale and retarded) in an otherwise rule-abiding post, I'd just baleet the image and warn the user... but in all honesty, I can't think of a single time I've seen one of those get posted to Heyuri. It's always the shitty 2017+ ones that are designed to annoy people as much as possible, and leaves no doubt about the user's intentions
>unchecked influx of actual tiktok culture
If you're referring to the "hawk tuah" thing that Sweet Emo seems to have a penchant for (regardless of how irrelevant it is to the topic), it's not "tiktok culture" - it was a viral internet phenomenon/meme that hit the mainstream and got remixed to death like all the others in internet history. Since Tiktok is one of the most popular video-hosting sites in the world right now, naturally it was heavily featured there - but it was also all over every other website (well, except this one) and featured on mainstream news. Hell, even Jim "old, out-of-touch man who hates everything new since 1985" Cornette discussed it on his podcast - that's how I first heard about it
That doesn't mean we should have it all over Heyuri (if for no other reason than because it's old and stale), but it's incorrect to file it under "tiktok culture". Us being referred to as "tumblrlicious pals" and treating 2015 as a year to be celebrated was far more egregious
Post number
No.
69219
Board
Site Discussion@Heyuri
Reason
Optional. Describe what's wrong with it.
Style: