all
a
/
b
/
c
/
f
/
h
/
j
/
jp
/
l
/
o
/
q
/
s
/
sw
/
lounge
cgi
up
wiki
Heyuri!
Bulletin Boards
2D Cute
2D Ero
2D Lolikon
3D Girls
Anime/Manga
Flash
Girl Talk
日本語/Japan
Lounge
Oekaki
Off-Topic
Site Discussion
Strange World
Overboard
Heyuri★CGI
Heyuri★CGI
@PartyII
Battle Royale R
Chat
Chinsouki★
Dating
DevChat
Drama Club
Hakoniwa Islands PvE
Hakoniwa Islands PvP
Polls
Slime Breeder
Web Banana
Web Shiritori
Yumemiru Gambler
Kakiko Checker
Other
Anime Nominations
Banners
Cytube
Heyuri Calendar
Heyuri Wiki
MAL Club
Museum
Steam Group
Uploader
[
Settings
]
[
Home
] [
Contact
] [
Catalog
] [
Search
] [
Thread list
] [
Stats
] [
Reports
] [
Watcher
] [
PMs
] [
Admin
]
Site Discussion@Heyuri
it's the place to be!
[
Return
]
Report a post
Preview
Anonymous
## Mod
2025/06/15
(Sun)
10:28:00
ID:MODERATOR
No.
68732
[
Report
]
▶
Believe it or not, Heyuri actually has
less
Russian users and material on it than it used to - see the entire period when kuz and kolyma/"9ch" was involved with it
Anyway, as someone who is not clued up on Russian memes or whatever (and doesn't care to be), I personally think backseat moderators complaining about threads that don't clearly break any of Heyuri's own rules (and frequently metaposting in those threads to do so) is closer to rule-breaking than the threads themselves; especially when nobody except the backseat moderator themselves even recognizes the material being posted to be annoyed by it
Posts that are clearly recognizable as being Rule 8-breaking (wojaks, *oomer phrases, obnoxious "ironic shitposting", etc.) obviously get dealt with the moment they're spotted - so there's no need to worry about any of that stuff ever "flooding" Heyuri. And you can see that even of the threads you linked, one was autosage'd (and the OP recieved a ban in the same thread for posting now-deleted obnoxious TikTok-style garbage)
Heyuri's Off-Topic and Lounge boards allow a wide variety of topics by design - including Russian ones. If any one user or topic begins to dominate a board, it will eventually be dealt with. In fact I already have proposals relating to certain ongoing instances of this for teh next Townhall
Regarding
>>68711
- there's nothing wrong with a new user accidentally breaking a rule due to unfamiliarity (like quote function abuse/"greentext", which is actually a newer rule of ours and was once both allowed and commonplace here), being informed about the rule, and then the user apologizing and following it. That's exactly how it should be, rather than staff-san immediately resorting to banhammers and baleetion sticks
Post number
No.
68732
Board
Site Discussion@Heyuri
Reason
Optional. Describe what's wrong with it.
Style: