[Return]

Report a post

Preview
>>68214
It's "pedobear-type humor" wink There's way more scary loli-faces-fapper here.

>c'mon
That one is more questionable indeed, but it's now reminding me of Twitterfags bitching about revealing SKIN glare2

It seems to me that acceptance of loli eroticism in its development follows the same path of accepting usual, completely normal women bodies.

If you are the OP why is your ID constantly changing?

>>68215
>"SFW" doesn't play into Heyuri's moderation at all
But while loli photos aren't going to be banned completely, they are going to be judged based on it, am I wrong?

>the first 4 vids
Can agree with the rating nyaoo-closedeyes I'm regretting Miraculous Angel, though.

>...that's exactly how these things work, unless I'm misinterpreting you
I was meaning it more Heyuri aside, in a more global context. Like what World is telling to 3D lolicons. And that's not how fetishes work, we're not Gods in our own universes to not bother anyone with it, we're social monkeys loving other monkeys. nyaoo-closedeyes

I read your explanation/rationale, but at the end of the day, this site policy change is indistinguishable from what other sites did because of external pressure or having convinced antis in stuff, some will go fuhrer, collaborating and reporting commenters' IPs like Gelbooru/ATF do. In some sense it means that modern world has won over Heyuri nyaoo-closedeyes And it will also lose this particular Japanese thing.

>fap to this post if u so desire
A man in power and with such a confident stance... I'm getting wet down there love
Post number No.68217
Board Site Discussion@Heyuri
Optional. Describe what's wrong with it.