I want to allow as much as I realistically can, that is, as much as our host is comfortable with
So far teh only trouble I faced with this host was a video (from elsewhere) which contained a clothed child being present where adults were having sekkusu, so that's the current boundary until I get another warning.
In 4+ years of its existence, Heyuri has not a single time got any warnings from its host or domain. I doubt we would see a sudden termination without any warnings for something like risque picz of some kids. If we get a warning about it however, we will then do the necessary and ban whatever we were warned about to keep Heyuri alive.

>>67917
Don't worry about that, likes of gore & scat pr0nz are perfectly fine on off-topic. Unless there comes a time where an individual or a group of people are trying to dominate the board with such stuff (or we decide there is otherwise an unwanted shift), they belong on off-topic.

As for the discussion of loli on the 3D Girls board:
First of all, it's crucial to not mix the discussions of "what is the extend of stuff we can host without getting Heyuri in trouble" and "what type of board we want 3D Girls to be". While first one is a objective discussion trying to keep Heyuri alive, the latter should not pay regard to any legal limits - which would later be applied on top of the "rules" we reach here.
As I said in my first sentence, my only limits are legal ones. In a theoretical utopia where there are no laws limiting what we are allowed to fap to, I believe threads for both rori and adult fetishists could coexist in peace, so could mixed ones if that's something the thread topic allows. The discussion of "we are not a pedo site!" vs "true heyurizens are pedos!" is hereby highly lame and is a result of overthinking about what u get b0nerz from