>>64056
Thanks for clarifying. Regarding the 9ch issue, Epik said
>We did make the election to not route 8Chan, though we are their registrar. The reason for this is due to concerns about the lack of adequate moderation of a completely anonymous website.
which was the content at the link provided by Monster. So that seems to be the one relating to 9ch as opposed to the previous link that was just in the complaint email, right? Here it's once again not the registrar but the DNS service, but maybe I'm still confused about what happened there? I wasn't even aware 9ch was ever a thing after all.

As far as I could gather, njalla is not a domain name registrar, it's a proxy service below a domain name registrar. It retains full legal ownership of the domain and merely "leases" it to you, is that right?