I think it would be best to just go back to enforcing "don't post meta outside /q/”, and let earnest, non-trolling discussions about kuz occur here on /q/ if they arise

I'm sure even kuz recognizes that he is a controversial figure that does controversial things, and we are currently funded and sysadmin'd by him, so controversy is to be expected. His demand for us to delete one half of (or the entirety of) all kuz-related discussions is itself controversial, and guaranteed to cause more issues and drive away more users/activity than if we were to just let the situation cool down naturally and explain things openly and honestly when needed

I'll reiterate this because it's important: if you think locking down discussions about kuz North Korea-style on Heyuri is going to help bring about peace & unity, take the heat off kuz, reduce your headaches, or boost Heyuri's usercount and activity, I think you're in for a big shock and/or disappointment

"The road to hell is paved with good intentions", "peace is not the absence of conflict...", yadda yadda

>Heyuri is not your kuz hateclub. (or was it a little different?)
The phrase was "Heyuri is not a kuz site", which is an eternally true statement. While he does currently foot our bills (arigatou (´人｀)), Heyuri itself is an idea that transcends any one individual. I am Heyuri, you are Heyuri, everyone here is Heyuri