>>61046
>Whether I agree with the things written on the tips page or not (and it's certainly more agreeable now than before), I don't agree that it's a good idea to host a completely serious, not-even-funny, and totally out of character list of 9001 different rules and guidelines for every little minor annoyance and pet peeve that the staff or the users have ever had, even if it includes things I myself have brought up in the past
>this is why I had a problem with such a page in the first place!
I don't understand, is the pages seriousness the reason you had a problem?