>>61049
>Fixed /o/
Awesome

>The policy kuz expects from me is enforcing rules 1:1, and not deal with anything that isn't written there; while I was discussing him about this he exactly said that no good site ever relies on "common sense", so there is no point in discussing this with me.
Well in that case I vehemently disagree with kuz's bizarre new stance on Heyuri moderation!!!

Heyuri was NEVAR about following some lame ass rules to the letter - kuz's own freaking moderation during the lolico+kuz days was the EPITOME of throwing out the rulebook and just using b&hammer whenever it felt right (and when it felt fun!), and that's the way I liek'd it!

>btw, do you find changes I made to rules except this part reasonable?
The rules are fine, it's just the "netiquette" crap I haet and I think will skew the image of this place to newcomers who don't know better in totally the wrong direction

If anything that page needed BALEETing, not rewriting or reaffirming!