Fixed /o/
You can see oekakis from other threads under threads, at first I assumed that was me messing up uploads of log files, but seems like it's a new feature: https://github.com/satopian/poti-kaini-EN/
>v3.19.5 (I don't update each time POTI board receives an update, and we skipped this one)
>Added the ability to display images of the next and previous threads in the reply view.
It also have a lot of feature changes like continuing an oekaki not creating a new thread apparently. Hope you will enjoy using /o/!

>>61046
>I think it's far better to keep the rules as minimal and non-specific as possible, and for everyone (including staff) to just lurk appropriately and play it by ear using common sense and intuition
I can agree with this. I sometimes go read Heyuri's archived threads to remind myself of how Heyuri works too, being staff doesn't mean we are entitled to do whatever we want on Heyuri (neither does any other site's staff). I believe lurking is more beneficial than reading rools or such pages anywhere on internet, but that's not the topic here.

The thing is I would be disabling myself from enforcing any disturbances if I only force global rules, except very obvious R8 breaking stuff like p*pes. The policy kuz expects from me is enforcing rules 1:1, and not deal with anything that isn't written there; while I was discussing him about this he exactly said that no good site ever relies on "common sense", so there is no point in discussing this with me.

I am not trying to "blame" him for this, especially not after he gave me right to edit rules. He just expects me to have them written down carefully, which I believe to have done now.

Also
>Consider that digit checking, quote function abuse, quotelinking the OP in a reply, and not using line breaks appropriately on Strange World were all initially commonplace on Heyuri
I thought about this too! There is a reason Rule 10 tells you MAY get WARNED (and not b&'d, I actually ban users pretty rare myself - most public ban texts actually belongs to warnings). It's a word play to justify any warns that I issue or not issue regarding netiquette rules

>no rules or staff action required
I can't know if staff action was required or not, but I did warn users a lot

btw, do you find changes I made to rules except this part reasonable?

------

Holy shit this thread is getting very long to scroll. But I did everything that I had in my mind when I created it, so unless you see something that I don't do, it completed its purpose except for this small netiquette issue