/o/ got b0rked thanks to a folder permission I didn't have causing update to be left half finished ;_;
I have backup of databases so you don't need to worry, but I will wait for kuz to wake up and check my permissions before trying to fix it

>>61042
I don't understand what about it you are protesting. The rule I added is telling only points under Heyuri-tan's razor is enforced, which I modified after kuz. I could understand wanting rules not to explicitly written in such manner. That's how I approach too actually, but kuz doesn't want us to be subjective while enforcing rules - I wouldn't be able to enforce much of the rules you want to see getting enforced if I didn't write them out officially. It hasn't been very long since I discussed with kuz about this
My point was "There isn't a 10 page of rules defining what exactly is allowed and what is not", and his was "there should be" and "you have to be objective"

>half the things written on that page I would consider debatable, or in downright opposition to the culture
Half of the things written there are still "suggestions", I carefully worded which are rules we could enforce and which aren't. But I wonder which ones you are considering "downright opposition to the culture", I wouldn't want to make such a mistake. I will write what I was thinking:

>Do not link to the OP post when replying to the OP post.
I was privately warning users for this long before this was written down. I don't think anyone is against this here

>Feel free to use "sage" as a downvote, although you should primarily use it when you don't contribute to thread or replying to a point made on another post.
First half is the exact opposite of forcing and what was written before. Second half, I used "should" because it wouldn't be forced.

>You are highly encouraged to create new threads instead of "chatting" in one thread.
>You can reply to older threads sitting in the backlog archive, but note that they won't get bumped. Consider creating a new thread to reply them if you think it's important
These aren't forced either, but I don't see anything wrong here. It's encouraged to create new threads

>Do not use nu-4chan words/phrases such as "based", "cringe", "cunny", "fam" etc, or don't shorten words with an apostrophe like "'yuri" instead of "heyuri".
This one is enforced. A post on ayashii inspired me to add this, but this hasn't even been any issue to us so far

>Do not misuse the quoting feature: don't write "greentext" stories or quote something the user you are replying didn't directly tell. You may use it to quote texts from outer sites too.
This one is also enforced, but it's not very hard to not break this rule anyways. I don't think you are against this one?

>Prettify your posts with emotes as you see appropriate.
Yes, a lot of users forget they exist. But this is just a suggestion as well, hence I wrote "as you see appropriate" and not "as I would see appropriate"

>If you need to upload large files or need to share images on textboards, use this site(2ちゃん). Feel free dump images on imageboards.
There isn't anything wrong with image dumping. But to not sound too strict, I will change this to "you can use this site" to allow users use other services too.