I think one problem we will have to face up to more and more as Heyuri gains popularity is the problem of moralfaggotry. You know, people hopped up on the overriding philosophy of nu-chan and the popular net. That philosophy of "Internet is Serious Business.", which causes them to recoil at the sight of unfettered LOLs, to fail to understand plain sarcasm, and to make it their mission to shit up a thread so they can go on some faggy moral crusade.
You probably already know who I'm talking about, and can probably already guess the two types of moralfags we're likely to run into, so I won't bury the lead.
We don't see many moralfags from the liberal set,since their concept of imageboards begins ends at 4chan and they're too scared to explore anywhere else (last I remember is that tranny posting Bridget. How the fuck did he even get here?)
What we do see a bit of, and will probably see more of in the future, is idpol obssessed 2016 election tourists, who consider it their duty to stamp out 'degeneracy', 'tranime' and any LOLs they may encounter along the way
Heyuri is in particular danger, because of our front and center interest in lolis,our refusal to spend all day arguing about idpol talking points, and our refusal of wojak/oomer monstrosities, which is the main way moralfags beat you over the head with their opinions these days.
So what do you think we can do about this, if anything? I mean, even before the recent surge, there were some people derailing JC threads, even right NOW there are people shitting up such threads, see >>31277
I feel like under no politics there should be an addendum that insists on no moralfaggotry, but at the same time I feel like that would be too vague, and not so useful.
I don't know, I feel like if we're too easy-going about it the zoomer moralfags will outnumber everyone else and this will become just another shitty imageboard devoid of all LOLs.