>>161292
in medieval times some kings banned commoners from entering entire forests, just so that they could hunt for sport, this lead to people starving but they didnt care, because what matters more is exclusivity, having something that others cannot.

if lolis were for everyone then most "elites" would likely be disinterested in them, they dont actually like lolis, they like the fact that YOU cant have them and they CAN. Which is entirely different from someone who likes lolis because they like lolis.

someone who only likes something because coveting it makes them feel superior isnt someone who actually loves those things, its someone who gets off on being able to do things others cant or arent allowed to, which is sexualization of "transgression".

If people were put in prison for 400 years for fucking watermelons, elites would be fucking watermelons.