>>160911
>Arch is just god damn unbeatable with the amount of stuff backing their repos
You know, the concept of the AUR is fucking terrible, it's terminally unsafe for both system & security to be downloading software packaged by developers who are not the maintainers of said software - but the AUR is so goddamn fast and has so much software vs. literally anything else on the market right now that I can't be assed to consider using anything else

I really hope KDE Linux leaves alpha soon, I've been looking for a good immutable Linux distro for ages, I much prefer doing it that way and with Flatpaks so every piece of software is it's own containerised OS with no contact with the rest of the system, this way you can ensure nothing stupid happens and the system is always 100% reliable

I do think Void Linux is a genuinely good distribution though, I wish they had official support for better WMs/DEs, I don't really see a use for Xfce if I can use KDE or Niri instead

>>160914
It does make a lot of good changes to the timings with Linux, especially CPU ones, Linux in general is very high-latency, almost unbearably so, for example the audio stack, your average PulseAudio (if you still use that for whatever reason) server has 1.5-2x the latency of a clean Windows install, and Windows is considered high-latency to begin with, so stuff like Zen helps a lot, and you'll notice the difference mostly in mouse inputs in things like videogames and apps like DaVinci Resolve

afaik macOS/BSD is as good as it gets