>>116599
>The book was recommended to me by a pro-contact pedophile who described it as a pro-contact book.

Who? Tom O'Carroll?


>However, as I've read it more, I'm not sure it's that simple. The book was controversial because she refused to repudiate her love for Peter, the pedophile. She even called him her soul-mate. I think if you were to ask Fragoso if she could live her life again without Peter in it, she would say no.


It sounds like she was conflicted about her relationship with him.


>>116601

>What a dumb fucking term You're either a pedophile or you're not. Either you want to fuck kids or not, there's nothing more nor less to that.

As >>116649 said the terms exist for a reason and make sense.