>Newgon wiki and it says on there that in her adult life she took an anti-pedo stance.

The book was recommended to me by a pro-contact pedophile who described it as a pro-contact book. The first time I read the book I thought it had an anti-contact message behind it, and that the person who recommended it to me had very poor reading comprehension. It certainly isn't pro-contact though, that's for sure. In the afterword she gives a link to a website where pedophiles can find therapy, knowing that pedophiles would read her book.

However, as I've read it more, I'm not sure it's that simple. The book was controversial because she refused to repudiate her love for Peter, the pedophile. She even called him her soul-mate. I think if you were to ask Fragoso if she could live her life again without Peter in it, she would say no.

Furthermore I was just thinking this morning about how stupid the term "pro-contact" is. Assuming you aren't a member of an ascetic religious order, would you describe yourself as "pro-sex"? Sex is not always a good thing, but it isn't inherently a bad thing. And the same for sexual contact between adults and children. It depends on the situation.

Regardless of contact stances, the book is a masterpiece and a must read for anyone who is interested in sex with children.